The Death of Christian Britain
The Death of Christian Britain
The Death of Christian Britain
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
— Postscript —<br />
Despite the reaction <strong>of</strong> some critics, I do not believe cultural historians<br />
should become more like ecclesiastical historians. For decades, many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
latter missed the vitality <strong>of</strong> faith beyond church walls in the past – its diversity,<br />
its folk qualities, its variation into forms that many clergy abhorred<br />
or, at best, ignored as unfashionable, uncouth and ‘pagan’. Discourse<br />
analysis, coupled with personal testimony, is one vital means for penetrating<br />
the extra-ecclesiastical dimensions <strong>of</strong> popular religion, getting into<br />
the minds, the bedrooms and the wardrobes <strong>of</strong> people as they conjured<br />
themselves as <strong>Christian</strong> men and women.<br />
WAS THE DEATH LATE? VISIONS OF THE<br />
INDUSTRIAL WORLD<br />
<strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Death</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> is about the world <strong>of</strong> modernity<br />
from 1800 to about 1950. It is about characterising this period as one<br />
<strong>of</strong> continuities in the culture <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> – its faith, discourses and<br />
protocols <strong>of</strong> behaviour. Attacking the notion that industrialisation and<br />
urbanisation secularised the British people was quite an acceptable and welcomed<br />
argument for many religious historians, who felt it to have long been<br />
an error <strong>of</strong> church and social history. But for others, this was an argument<br />
that was wrong in principle or degree – ‘too dedicated to revolutionist<br />
historiography’ 58 or ignoring the evidence <strong>of</strong> more gradual decline in the<br />
observance <strong>of</strong> religion.<br />
<strong>The</strong> principle at stake here is that <strong>of</strong> gradualism in secularisation – the<br />
supposed long-term nature <strong>of</strong> secularisation and its centrality to long-term<br />
modernisation. Traditional secularisation theory is founded on gradualism,<br />
inevitability and the grinding down <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong>ity and religious sensibility<br />
in general in the modernising world <strong>of</strong> Enlightenment thought, industrial<br />
work and urban living. Its greatest current sociological exponent is Steve<br />
Bruce, who maintains an unrelenting adherence to sociological orthodoxy<br />
even as some recent advocates (like Peter Berger) defect, 59 whilst Hugh<br />
McLeod, though far from being in favour <strong>of</strong> secularisation theory, writes that<br />
the ‘gradual decline <strong>of</strong> Christendom is one <strong>of</strong> the central themes in the history<br />
<strong>of</strong> western Europe and North America during the last three centuries’. 60<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were great changes to the way in which religion found social significance<br />
between 1800 and 1960 (including during 1870–1930 declining churchgoing<br />
but a rising relative importance attached to church membership,<br />
baptism <strong>of</strong> children and the pan-class culture <strong>of</strong> respectability). Yet this was<br />
far from constituting secularisation, but rather a religious readjustment to<br />
keep <strong>Christian</strong> culture dominant; for as long as the hegemony <strong>of</strong> discursive<br />
<strong>Christian</strong>ity remained, the secular society remained a long way <strong>of</strong>f. Evidence<br />
for the sustained importance <strong>of</strong> this culture comes in various forms. My<br />
211