21.03.2013 Views

The Death of Christian Britain

The Death of Christian Britain

The Death of Christian Britain

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

— <strong>The</strong> <strong>Death</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> —<br />

for femininity and piety. <strong>The</strong> ‘promiscuous girl’ <strong>of</strong> 1970, who was morally<br />

indifferent to her sexual activity if not proud <strong>of</strong> it, marked the end <strong>of</strong><br />

evangelical discourse. A generation later in the 1990s, this secular moral<br />

aggression <strong>of</strong> young women had been translated into ‘girl power’. Women<br />

still make up the majority <strong>of</strong> churchgoers. But they are overwhelmingly<br />

older women, raised under the old discourses, and who continue to seek<br />

affirmation <strong>of</strong> their moral and feminine identities in the <strong>Christian</strong> church.<br />

Men are proportionately under-represented as they always have been, but<br />

then Sunday church service is still an ‘unmanly’ site in discourse. <strong>The</strong> really<br />

important group that is missing from church is young women and girls.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no longer any femininity or moral identity for them to seek or<br />

affirm at the British <strong>Christian</strong> church. It is their absence that marks the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> evangelical femininity and piety, and the fusion between the two.<br />

Before 1800, <strong>Christian</strong> piety had been a ‘he’. From 1800 to 1960, it<br />

had been a ‘she’. After 1960, it became nothing in gendered terms. More<br />

than this, the eradication <strong>of</strong> gendered piety signalled the decentring <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Christian</strong>ity – its authority and its cultural significance. Scholars are increasingly<br />

coming to understand the relationship <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong>ity to society in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> gender, the body and sexuality. <strong>The</strong> way in which this relationship<br />

was configured changed in different ages, in what Foucault called<br />

different epistemes. But what has been new and unprecedented in the<br />

episteme <strong>of</strong> post-modernity since the 1960s has been the dissolution <strong>of</strong><br />

gendered discursive <strong>Christian</strong>ity. <strong>The</strong> ungendering <strong>of</strong> British <strong>Christian</strong>ity<br />

signalled something greater: the ‘absence’ <strong>of</strong> what Jeremy Carrette has called<br />

‘a transcendent and normative ideal’, 6 resulting in a religious vacuum into<br />

which considerable philosophical and theological energy is being poured<br />

in a search for a new way <strong>of</strong> corralling the human religious spirit when<br />

there is no centre and no coda. It is precisely because ‘the personal’ changed<br />

so much in the 1960s – and has continued to change in the four decades<br />

since – that the churches are in seemingly terminal decay and British<br />

<strong>Christian</strong> culture is in its death throes. Charles Taylor is right; it seems<br />

unlikely that there will ever be a return to an age <strong>of</strong> faith. <strong>The</strong> evangelical<br />

narrative has decayed; the discourses on gendered religiosity have withered.<br />

<strong>The</strong> search for personal faith is now in ‘the New Age’ <strong>of</strong> minor cults,<br />

personal development and consumer choice. <strong>The</strong> universal world-view<br />

<strong>of</strong> both <strong>Christian</strong>ity and identity which prevailed until the 1950s seems<br />

impossible to recreate in any form.<br />

<strong>The</strong> way <strong>of</strong> viewing religion and religious decline in <strong>Britain</strong> <strong>of</strong>fered in<br />

this book – if it is correct – should have wider applicability. It may help<br />

to explain the near contemporaneous secularisation <strong>of</strong> Norway, Sweden,<br />

Australia and perhaps New Zealand, and should help to account for the<br />

rapid secularisation <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> Catholic Europe since the 1970s. Critically,<br />

it may also help to explain the North American anomaly. Throughout<br />

secularisation studies from the 1950s to the 1990s, the United States and<br />

196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!