21.03.2013 Views

The Death of Christian Britain

The Death of Christian Britain

The Death of Christian Britain

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

— <strong>The</strong> <strong>Death</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> —<br />

non-mainstream churches increased their proportion <strong>of</strong> marriages from 7.3<br />

per cent in 1895 to 9.1 per cent in 1935, only to fall in subsequent years,<br />

whilst a similar though less significant trend occurred in England. 64 For<br />

others, there was a trend <strong>of</strong> less frequent churchgoing, a trend largely<br />

apparent amongst adults. <strong>The</strong>y were attending church less, but associating<br />

with it still quite strongly.<br />

This need to associate with a church without necessarily worshipping in<br />

it is very important to the understanding <strong>of</strong> what was happening to religion<br />

in the first half <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century. To take figures from the<br />

best recorded part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> – Scotland – it seems that by the middle <strong>of</strong><br />

the century something like a minimum <strong>of</strong> 44 per cent <strong>of</strong> the Scottish people<br />

had a church affiliation (including Sunday school enrolments), but only<br />

about 12 per cent <strong>of</strong> the people attended church on a given Sunday. 65 This<br />

means that about just over one in four <strong>of</strong> church affiliates attended on a<br />

given Sunday, with figures <strong>of</strong> very similar proportions probably pertaining<br />

in the rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>. Large numbers <strong>of</strong> people were sustaining a relatively<br />

inactive church connection. <strong>The</strong>y were keeping a bond between themselves<br />

and a church, an act <strong>of</strong> symbolic attachment. This was most apparent in<br />

the people’s connections with religious rites <strong>of</strong> passage. <strong>The</strong> British people<br />

retained a very strong attachment to religious baptisms, marriages and<br />

funerals. Figure 7.3 shows that marriage sustained a very important hold<br />

on the affections <strong>of</strong> couples, giving way only marginally to civil marriage<br />

between 1900 and the late 1950s. Even more striking from Figure 7.4 was<br />

the growing popularity <strong>of</strong> baptism in the Church <strong>of</strong> England during the<br />

first four decades <strong>of</strong> the century. Similarly, there was an exceptionally high<br />

level <strong>of</strong> Sunday school enrolment (Fig. 7.5), a level about double that <strong>of</strong><br />

the mid-Victorian period. Though it declined notably in the 1930s, it recovered<br />

strongly during 1945–55, and was by then the British people’s most<br />

common form <strong>of</strong> participation in organised religion. To these ‘<strong>of</strong>ficial’ rites<br />

<strong>of</strong> passage were the un<strong>of</strong>ficial systems <strong>of</strong> popular religious belief which<br />

survived very strongly amongst women. 66 Popular attachment to such<br />

religious rites, ‘<strong>of</strong>ficial’ and ‘un<strong>of</strong>ficial’, not only sustained a continuity<br />

between industrial and pre-industrial eras, and between urban and rural<br />

<strong>Britain</strong>, but their survival and, in the case <strong>of</strong> Anglican baptism, growth in<br />

popularity constituted a critical element in the changing pattern <strong>of</strong> people’s<br />

religious identity.<br />

It should be clear, even in this brief chapter, that existing secularisation<br />

theory fails to explain the observable statistical data upon which it has been<br />

erected for two centuries. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, social<br />

class was a poor predictor <strong>of</strong> variations in churchgoing, the working classes<br />

dominated the congregations <strong>of</strong> virtually all denominations, and churchgoing<br />

and church membership per capita grew during <strong>Britain</strong>’s most rapid<br />

urbanisation between 1800 and 1880. <strong>The</strong> consequence is that it is an error<br />

for the historian or sociologist to conclude from religious statistics that the<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!