21.03.2013 Views

Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy

Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy

Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

About Plato's Philebus 171<br />

"What you enjoin me to do is not difficult,"55 and he repeats: "It is<br />

easy."<br />

Let us be on our guard. All wise men agree, and thereby really<br />

exalt themselves, says Socrates, that voiig is king <strong>of</strong> heaven and earth.<br />

Socrates adds: "Perhaps they are<br />

right."<br />

50<br />

What foUows is indeed an easy, but not too convincing "cosmological"<br />

account, which ends with the statement that voiig belongs to that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

all."<br />

67<br />

four tribes which was called "the cause <strong>of</strong> Notice, please, again,<br />

"<strong>of</strong><br />

all."<br />

And Socrates adds: "Now,<br />

you have at last your<br />

answer."<br />

Protarchus: "Yes, and a very sufficient one; and yet you answered without<br />

my noticing it." 5S Socrates: "Yes, Protarchus, for sometimes playing<br />

provides rest from serious<br />

pursuit."<br />

"cosmological"<br />

59 We understand: the<br />

account, which makes the voiig the cause <strong>of</strong> all the other tribes, was a<br />

playful account. We are not sure whether this voiig is the "divine<br />

mentioned before. And let us not forget that,<br />

within the confines<br />

<strong>of</strong> human life, the best, voiig could obtain, was the second prize.<br />

Socrates concludes this entire discussion <strong>of</strong> the four tribes by pointing to<br />

voiig and to pleasure. He does not mention anything pertaining<br />

and to the "mixture."<br />

to "limit"<br />

Let us remember, he says, "that votig was akin to<br />

cause and belonged roughly speaking [o"xe86v] to this tribe and that<br />

pleasure was itself limitless and belonged to the tribe which, in and by<br />

end." 60<br />

itself, has not and never will have either beginning or middle or<br />

We must add that this holds also for pain. As we have seen, the dialogue,<br />

too, has neither a beginning nor an end, and for that matter, no middle.<br />

The graph <strong>of</strong> a Platonic dialogue usually not always looks like this:<br />

But the graph <strong>of</strong> the Philebus looks hke this:<br />

55 28 C.<br />

5 Ibid.<br />

57 30 E.<br />

58 Ibid.<br />

58 Ibid.<br />

60 31 A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!