PeopleSmart in Business eBook - The Platinum Rule

PeopleSmart in Business eBook - The Platinum Rule PeopleSmart in Business eBook - The Platinum Rule

platinumrule.com
from platinumrule.com More from this publisher
20.03.2013 Views

42 Three: How Will You Know One When You Meet One? natural for Indirect people. Number of successes divided by number of tries equals success. In a given month, they may try 10 things. Nine may be successfully completed, one not—for a success ratio of 90%. When Indirect people fl op, they tend to take the setback personally. Th ey are likely to internalize or privately think about it, oft en wondering if there’s something wrong with them. “How could I have been so stupid?” Just give them a hint that something is going wrong, and reserved folks may engage in negative self-talk for days. Indirect people tend to move at a slower or more measured pace. For them, sooner or later is good enough. Th ey speak and respond more slowly since they are more cautious or stability-focused when considering change. If the behavior becomes too measured, detractors (usually Direct people) can view this as dragging their feet, or even lacking interest. Predictability is more important to such Indirect people, so they tend to consider the pros and cons, attend to details, and fact-fi nd. Caught in a gray area with no clear-cut guidelines, they usually ask for clarifi cation or permission before they take action. Th ey seek to meet their needs by accommodating the requirements of their environment. Generally they operate according to established formats and rules, so when you make an appointment with an Indirect person, you can expect him to show up on time, or possibly wait for you! Indirect people tend to communicate by asking instead of stating. Th eir questions clarify, support, or seek more information—“By that, do you mean . . . ?” Th ey prefer qualifi ed statements—“According to my sources, the candidate received an advanced degree from a non-accredited university.” Th ey speak more tentatively and take a roundabout or step-by-step approach—“It seems to me that this is so.” If they don’t like something, they respond subtly—“Well, I think your other suit looks better.” Th ey reserve the right to express their opinions or keep them to themselves. But, they can also act like impregnable rocks when they don’t want to crack.

Some are more, some less It is important to realize that people vary in their location on this scale of Direct to Indirect behaviors. Th ink of someone you know who irritates you. Now that you know about Direct and Indirect characteristics, have you fi gured out which trait best describes him or her? One important consideration is to determine the person’s preferred pace. Pace refers to natural rate of speed—whether he does things quickly or slowly. Bearing in mind pace and other trait descriptors for Direct and Indirect people, let’s determine whether that person is more Direct or Indirect. Nobody fi ts exactly in the middle. You may be wondering which are better—Direct traits or Indirect ones. We can answer with an unqualifi ed, “It depends.” Sometimes it’s better to act more Direct and sometimes it’s better to act more Indirect. Comparing the two is like evaluating San Diego and New York City. Each is very diff erent, yet we could build a strong argument in either one’s favor. Appropriateness depends on the requirements of a situation. Th e real question isn’t which is better, but how to best use the positive aspects of each trait while recognizing accompanying less developed attributes. Since each of our lives involves a variety of situations requiring diff ering responses, remember there is no one best personality type. Th e idea is to maximize people’s natural traits while understanding and trying to minimize their accompanying drawbacks. Survey of Directness versus Indirectness Th is is an informal survey designed to provide you with a general description of how you see others in daily situations. Answer as objectively as possible. Th is is a non-judgmental assessment—there are no right or wrong answers. Choose one person you know (socially, personally, or at work) and answer these nine questions in terms of how you see that person most of the time, in most situations. Th is will help you deter- 43

42<br />

Three: How Will You Know One When You Meet One?<br />

natural for Indirect people. Number of successes divided by number<br />

of tries equals success. In a given month, they may try 10 th<strong>in</strong>gs. N<strong>in</strong>e<br />

may be successfully completed, one not—for a success ratio of 90%.<br />

When Indirect people fl op, they tend to take the setback personally.<br />

Th ey are likely to <strong>in</strong>ternalize or privately th<strong>in</strong>k about it, oft en wonder<strong>in</strong>g<br />

if there’s someth<strong>in</strong>g wrong with them. “How could I have been<br />

so stupid?” Just give them a h<strong>in</strong>t that someth<strong>in</strong>g is go<strong>in</strong>g wrong, and<br />

reserved folks may engage <strong>in</strong> negative self-talk for days.<br />

Indirect people tend to move at a slower or more measured pace. For<br />

them, sooner or later is good enough. Th ey speak and respond more<br />

slowly s<strong>in</strong>ce they are more cautious or stability-focused when consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />

change. If the behavior becomes too measured, detractors (usually Direct<br />

people) can view this as dragg<strong>in</strong>g their feet, or even lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

Predictability is more important to such Indirect people, so they<br />

tend to consider the pros and cons, attend to details, and fact-fi nd.<br />

Caught <strong>in</strong> a gray area with no clear-cut guidel<strong>in</strong>es, they usually ask<br />

for clarifi cation or permission before they take action. Th ey seek to<br />

meet their needs by accommodat<strong>in</strong>g the requirements of their environment.<br />

Generally they operate accord<strong>in</strong>g to established formats and<br />

rules, so when you make an appo<strong>in</strong>tment with an Indirect person, you<br />

can expect him to show up on time, or possibly wait for you!<br />

Indirect people tend to communicate by ask<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stead of stat<strong>in</strong>g. Th eir<br />

questions clarify, support, or seek more <strong>in</strong>formation—“By that, do you<br />

mean . . . ?” Th ey prefer qualifi ed statements—“Accord<strong>in</strong>g to my sources,<br />

the candidate received an advanced degree from a non-accredited university.”<br />

Th ey speak more tentatively and take a roundabout or step-by-step<br />

approach—“It seems to me that this is so.” If they don’t like someth<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

they respond subtly—“Well, I th<strong>in</strong>k your other suit looks better.” Th ey reserve<br />

the right to express their op<strong>in</strong>ions or keep them to themselves. But,<br />

they can also act like impregnable rocks when they don’t want to crack.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!