LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
94 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> XII<br />
situations but to use his years of experience to provide support for the<br />
congregations. 136<br />
From his letter of 9 March 1763, it appears that Ziegenhagen may have<br />
felt that his assessment of Muehlenberg twenty years earlier had been largely<br />
accurate. Twenty years of experience in America should have been sufficient<br />
for Muehlenberg to be able to handle the situations which presented<br />
themselves. Yet, he still came to Ziegenhagen and Francke, who had never<br />
been in America, for their advice. His limited information, however, made it<br />
difficult for them to provide proper advice, leaving Ziegenhagen to feel that<br />
Muehlenberg was more interested in complaining than in solving his<br />
problems. What also irritated Ziegenhagen was that he had cause to question<br />
Muehlenberg’s objectivity in reporting situations. For Ziegenhagen had a<br />
visit from a certain Leimle who belonged to a group of people in<br />
Philadelphia who opposed Muehlenberg. Naturally, Leimle’s view of things<br />
in Philadelphia would differ from Muehlenberg’s report of them. But this<br />
left Ziegenhagen doubly in the dark and did not help his relationship with<br />
Muehlenberg. Thus, Ziegenhagen was relieved when Muehlenberg directed<br />
his London correspondence to F. W. Pasche, Ziegenhagen’s assistant, and<br />
with G. A. Wachsel, the preacher at St George’s German Church in London.<br />
The natural development of the <strong>Lutheran</strong> Church in North America,<br />
which began to include pastors who had not been educated in Halle, as well<br />
as the advancing age of Ziegenhagen and Francke, meant that by the 1760s<br />
little central control was being exerted from London and Halle. To be sure,<br />
as long as these second generation Pietists were alive, a psychological tie<br />
was maintained and, materially, some help continued to come to North<br />
America from overseas. Thus, when Ziegenhagen died in 1776, Pasche<br />
informed Muehlenberg of his passing in the following words: “What a great<br />
loss this will be for the dear United Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> congregations and<br />
their preachers in Pennsylvania … .” And, in spite of the fact that<br />
Ziegenhagen did not have as close a relationship as Muehlenberg had<br />
wished, the latter could say of him, “To lose such a spiritual father,<br />
counsellor, benefactor, intercessor, guide, etc., in these very critical and<br />
dangerous times is no small thing for the whole or for its smallest parts.” 137<br />
Norman J. Threinen, Th.D., is Professor of Historical Theology at<br />
<strong>Concordia</strong> <strong>Lutheran</strong> <strong>Seminary</strong>, Edmonton, Alberta.<br />
136 Ziegenhagen to Muehlenberg, Kensington, 9 March 1763, printed in Aland 3:31-41.<br />
137 Cited in Brunner 69.