20.03.2013 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THREINEN: FRIEDRICH MICHAEL ZIEGENHAGEN 89<br />

Grosshennersdorf. 119 Two years later, Francke chose Muehlenberg to be the<br />

first Halle pastor in Pennsylvania. After stopping for short periods to visit<br />

friends in Germany, Muehlenberg’s trip to America brought him to London.<br />

It was from Ziegenhagen that Muehlenberg received his call to go to<br />

Pennsylvania on the strength of the contact which Ziegenhagen had with the<br />

congregations there.<br />

Ziegenhagen had extensive contact with Muehlenberg over a period of<br />

nine weeks, during which this first Halle missionary make final preparations<br />

for sailing to America. After that length of time, he concluded that<br />

Muehlenberg was not the right man for the job. 120 On his side, Muehlenberg<br />

was very impressed with Ziegenhagen, who was seventeen years his senior<br />

and had already served for twenty years as Court Chaplain. In a letter to<br />

Francke, Muehlenberg commented on Ziegenhagen’s “power in exegesis,<br />

especially in the New Testament.” “If I did not have my present call”,<br />

Muehlenberg wrote, “I would wish to be his amanuensis, in order to profit<br />

from his exegesis and dogmatic theology.” 121 Twenty-one years later,<br />

Muehlenberg still recalled a suggestion which Ziegenhagen had made on this<br />

earlier occasion about the significance of Jesus’ washing the disciples’<br />

feet. 122<br />

When Muehlenberg reached America, he wrote individual letters to both<br />

Ziegenhagen and Francke dated the same day (21 September 1742). The two<br />

letters contained some of the same information but his letter to Ziegenhagen<br />

was almost three times as long and contained material which was more<br />

“folksy” in nature. He had also written three letters earlier on his trip. 123<br />

From these letters, it is apparent that, even though Ziegenhagen had a<br />

negative reaction to Muehlenberg, this first Halle missionary to America left<br />

London thinking that he and Ziegenhagen had established a strong personal<br />

relationship.<br />

Since the mail from America normally went to London before it went on<br />

to the continent, it was convenient for Muehlenberg to addressed letters<br />

jointly to Ziegenhagen and Francke. Ziegenhagen received the letters first<br />

119<br />

Kurt Aland, Die Korrespondenz Heinrich Melchior Muehlenberg (Berlin: Walter De<br />

Gruyter, 1986) 1:6.<br />

120<br />

Ziegenhagen was so unimpressed by Muehlenberg’s preaching that he became<br />

convinced that Francke had chosen the wrong man for America. Martin Schmidt, “Die<br />

Pietismus in Nordwest Deutschland”, in Der Pietismus als Theologische Erscheinung<br />

(Göttingen: Vanderehoeck & Ruprecht, 1984) 222, on the basis of a letter of Ziegenhagen to<br />

Francke, 27 April 1742 (I E 4:89). Schmidt erroneously indicates that the letter was dated<br />

15 January 1742, which would have been prior to Muehlenberg’s arrival in London. The<br />

15 January letter precedes the letter of 27 April in the manuscript collection.<br />

121<br />

Muehlenberg to F. A. Francke, Kensington, 22 June 1742 in Aland, 1:32.<br />

122<br />

Theodore G. Tappert and John W. Doberstein, trans., The Journals of Henry Melcheor<br />

Muhlenberg (Philadelphia: The Muhlenberg Press, 1945) 2:64.<br />

123<br />

Aland 1:33-38. See also footnote 3 in 1:36.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!