20.03.2013 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THREINEN: FRIEDRICH MICHAEL ZIEGENHAGEN 77<br />

As Francke was seeking a replacement for Gruendler in India, matters in<br />

the mission were going from bad to worse. Before he died, Gruendler had<br />

ordained Benjamin Schultze, one of the three new missionaries who had<br />

arrived in India on 16 September 1719. Consequently, on Gruendler’s death,<br />

Schultze took over leadership of the mission. When Heinrich Kistenmacher,<br />

one of the other new missionaries, questioned the validity of Schultze’s<br />

ordination and opposed his autocratic leadership style, Schultze took steps to<br />

remove him. 68 When Kistenmacher died late in 1722, Nicolaus Dal, the third<br />

missionary who arrived in 1719, picked up the fight with Schultze over how<br />

the situation with Kistenmacher had been handled. Francke wrote to the<br />

missionaries but nothing he could advise seemed to help. Fifteen years later,<br />

Gotthilf August Francke wrote, “In 1723, the mission seemed to be at the<br />

point of death from the sad disputes engendered by Mr. Schultze.” 69<br />

Schultze, shifting the blame for the sad state of the mission away from<br />

himself, wrote to the Archbishop of Canterbury (probably Francke and the<br />

Mission College, as well) asking for more co-workers. If they are not<br />

forthcoming, “the mission is dead”, wrote Schultze. 70 The Archbishop wrote<br />

Francke, who already knew about the sad state of the mission and the need<br />

for more missionaries. But to find the right people was not a simple matter.<br />

The first two whom Francke identified declined to go. Finally on<br />

25 September 1724, Francke wrote Ziegenhagen, who by then had moved to<br />

London, that he had found three men who were willing: 71 Christoph<br />

Theodosius Walther, Christian Friedrich Pressier, and Martin Bosse.<br />

The three new missionaries travelled to Copenhagen where they<br />

underwent a theological examination and were ordained. 72 All three of them<br />

also preached before Frederick IV, King of Denmark. From Copenhagen,<br />

they travelled to Halle to meet with Francke and then went to England. 73 It<br />

was early December before they finally left Halle. Meanwhile, with<br />

for the mission field in India, it is interesting that Germann, a nineteenth century Pietist<br />

historian of the Tranquebar mission, provides another version. “It was only by a thread that<br />

Ziegenhagen did not make the long trip to Tranquebar”, writes Germann. “Francke had in<br />

mind to make him the Probst [of the mission] but Copenhagen rejected him for flimsy<br />

reasons.” Germann 79.<br />

68 The nineteenth century biographer of Schultze didn’t even mention the conflict but<br />

simply says that “Kistenmacher was not much help because he was seldom well enough to<br />

function.” Johann Hartwig Brauer, Die Heidenboten Friedrich IV von Dänemark, III,<br />

Benjamin Schultze (Hamburg: Im Commission bei Perthes-Besser u. Mauke, 1841) 10-17.<br />

69 Quoted by Norgaard 136.<br />

70 Letter of Ziegenhagen to A. H. Francke, London, 21 July 1724.<br />

71 Letter of Ziegenhagen to A. H. Francke, London, 25 September 1724.<br />

72 Dal, Kistermacher, and Schultze seemed to have missed this step in the rush to get more<br />

workers to India in 1719; hence, they had gone to India without ordination and thereby<br />

brought to the situation the seeds of discontent which erupted into conflict.<br />

73 Letter of A. H. Francke to Ziegenhagen, Halle, 22 October 1724.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!