LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THREINEN: FRIEDRICH MICHAEL ZIEGENHAGEN 73<br />
territories in East India under English control, but couldn’t find any Anglican<br />
clergy with the qualifications of the German <strong>Lutheran</strong> missionaries. 60<br />
While this support from England and Germany helped to strengthen the<br />
mission, the governance of the mission from Denmark continued to be<br />
problematic. It was not until 1714, when a Mission College was named to<br />
give direction to the mission, that the situation in Denmark improved. Under<br />
the auspices of the Mission College, which was responsible directly to the<br />
king, the mission received the status of a Royal Mission and money from the<br />
royal purse became available to help pay the missionaries. 61 The efforts of<br />
Boehm helped establish, strengthen, and maintain the partnership which the<br />
SPCK and Halle had with Copenhagen. To this ongoing role, Ziegenhagen<br />
immediately fell heir as he followed Boehm as German Court Chaplain in<br />
London.<br />
Aside from the co-operative activities which the Court Chaplain<br />
undertook, the Chapel functioned much like the other <strong>Lutheran</strong><br />
congregations in London. It appears to have had a regular membership roll,<br />
which included the king and the German members of the royal household.<br />
The king, on his accession to the British throne in 1714, had become the<br />
head of the Church of England and theoretically an Anglican, but he never<br />
learned English. Besides this, he spent a great deal of his time in Germany<br />
where he continued to hold the title of Elector of Hanover and theoretically<br />
remained a <strong>Lutheran</strong>. Among King George’s household were his two<br />
mistresses, which he had brought with him from Germany. One of them, the<br />
Duchess of Kendal had already been attracted to Boehm’s preaching, and, at<br />
her request, Ziegenhagen arranged for a visit to her from the missionaries<br />
who were on their way to India in January 1725. The other mistress, the<br />
Duchess of Darlington, was a different matter. In April 1725, Ziegenhagen<br />
shared with Francke that the Duchess was very ill and subsequently that she<br />
had died. Ziegenhagen had often offered to visit her, but she had refused.<br />
Instead, she had “found comfort in plays” and had “surrounded herself with<br />
unbelievers”. She claimed to belong to the Anglican Church but did not call<br />
an Anglican preacher to attend to her. Ziegenhagen wrote that she was a bad<br />
example and influenced others in the Court.<br />
When George I died in 1727, he was succeeded by his son who became<br />
George II. The son lived until 1760 when he was succeeded by his grandson<br />
who became George III. With each accession to the throne, Ziegenhagen<br />
received a new call to be Court Chaplain. Although he had a large frame,<br />
according to his first biographer, he constantly referred to his weak<br />
constitution. On that account, he did not accept the responsibility in 1724 of<br />
serving St Mary’s in the Savoy during a pastoral vacancy; preaching twice a<br />
60 Brunner 104-7.<br />
61 Norgaard 70.