20.03.2013 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> XII<br />

The death of Anton Boehm on 27 May 1722 created a vacancy in the<br />

position of German <strong>Lutheran</strong> Court Chaplain in London. The following<br />

December, Ziegenhagen received a call from King George I to succeed<br />

Boehm in that position. How he came to be considered for this position is<br />

not clear. 45 Whether or not Francke was personally involved in<br />

recommending Ziegenhagen, it is apparent from Ziegenhagen’s correspondence<br />

with him that Francke was aware of these developments and approved<br />

of them.<br />

In October 1722, Ziegenhagen had become aware that he was being<br />

considered for the position. However, he was concerned that the matter be<br />

kept quiet to prevent various people in Hanover from making trouble for<br />

him, presumably by giving a bad report on him to the Elector of Hanover,<br />

who would have to issue the call as King of England. 46 In November, he<br />

travelled to London to meet with Georg Andreas Ruperti, who had served<br />

both as Boehm’s associate chaplain and as the pastor of St. Mary’s in the<br />

Savoy. On 6 December, Ziegenhagen preached in the royal chapel and was<br />

told by Ruperti that both of the chaplaincy positions would be commended<br />

to him. But, as Ziegenhagen wrote in a letter to Francke, he wasn’t certain<br />

that he would be able to handle both positions. Since the call issued by King<br />

George I on 11/22 December 1722 47 was to be successor of Anton Boehm<br />

and to fill only that position, it appears that Ziegenhagen opted not to take<br />

over both chaplaincy positions. 48 Boehm had been able to avoid being<br />

ordained by having an associate who was an ordained pastor. Given the<br />

silence about this issue in his correspondence with Francke, it is likely that<br />

Ziegenhagen followed the same path. It was a full year after the king issued<br />

this call, however, before Ziegenhagen finally moved to London. 49<br />

45 Brunner says that “When Boehm died, Count von Platen had his cabinet preacher<br />

[Ziegenhagen] appointed Court chaplain.” This is not supported by the correspondence of<br />

Ziegenhagen with Francke. Rather, it seems as if Francke had expressed concern about how<br />

von Platen had taken Ziegenhagen’s leaving, for Ziegenhagen assured Francke that their<br />

parting in Hanover had been cordial. Letter of Ziegenhagen to A. H. Francke, London,<br />

21 February 1724.<br />

46 Letter of Ziegenhagen to A. H. Francke, Linden, 31 October 1722.<br />

47 The double date was due to the fact that Germany adopted the Gregorian calendar in 1700<br />

while England did not adopt it until 1752. According to the old Julian calendar used in<br />

England in 1722, the date would be 11 December; according to the Gregorian calendar used<br />

in Germany it would be 22 December.<br />

48 Lists of chaplains of the German Royal Chapel show Ruperti serving as Court Chaplain<br />

from 1711 to 1731. John Southerden Burn, The History of the French Walloon, Dutch and<br />

other Foreign Protestant Refugees settled in England (London: Longman, Brown, Green and<br />

Langmans, 1846).<br />

49 Letter of Ziegenhagen to A. H. Francke, London, 17 January 1724.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!