LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
68 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> XII<br />
The death of Anton Boehm on 27 May 1722 created a vacancy in the<br />
position of German <strong>Lutheran</strong> Court Chaplain in London. The following<br />
December, Ziegenhagen received a call from King George I to succeed<br />
Boehm in that position. How he came to be considered for this position is<br />
not clear. 45 Whether or not Francke was personally involved in<br />
recommending Ziegenhagen, it is apparent from Ziegenhagen’s correspondence<br />
with him that Francke was aware of these developments and approved<br />
of them.<br />
In October 1722, Ziegenhagen had become aware that he was being<br />
considered for the position. However, he was concerned that the matter be<br />
kept quiet to prevent various people in Hanover from making trouble for<br />
him, presumably by giving a bad report on him to the Elector of Hanover,<br />
who would have to issue the call as King of England. 46 In November, he<br />
travelled to London to meet with Georg Andreas Ruperti, who had served<br />
both as Boehm’s associate chaplain and as the pastor of St. Mary’s in the<br />
Savoy. On 6 December, Ziegenhagen preached in the royal chapel and was<br />
told by Ruperti that both of the chaplaincy positions would be commended<br />
to him. But, as Ziegenhagen wrote in a letter to Francke, he wasn’t certain<br />
that he would be able to handle both positions. Since the call issued by King<br />
George I on 11/22 December 1722 47 was to be successor of Anton Boehm<br />
and to fill only that position, it appears that Ziegenhagen opted not to take<br />
over both chaplaincy positions. 48 Boehm had been able to avoid being<br />
ordained by having an associate who was an ordained pastor. Given the<br />
silence about this issue in his correspondence with Francke, it is likely that<br />
Ziegenhagen followed the same path. It was a full year after the king issued<br />
this call, however, before Ziegenhagen finally moved to London. 49<br />
45 Brunner says that “When Boehm died, Count von Platen had his cabinet preacher<br />
[Ziegenhagen] appointed Court chaplain.” This is not supported by the correspondence of<br />
Ziegenhagen with Francke. Rather, it seems as if Francke had expressed concern about how<br />
von Platen had taken Ziegenhagen’s leaving, for Ziegenhagen assured Francke that their<br />
parting in Hanover had been cordial. Letter of Ziegenhagen to A. H. Francke, London,<br />
21 February 1724.<br />
46 Letter of Ziegenhagen to A. H. Francke, Linden, 31 October 1722.<br />
47 The double date was due to the fact that Germany adopted the Gregorian calendar in 1700<br />
while England did not adopt it until 1752. According to the old Julian calendar used in<br />
England in 1722, the date would be 11 December; according to the Gregorian calendar used<br />
in Germany it would be 22 December.<br />
48 Lists of chaplains of the German Royal Chapel show Ruperti serving as Court Chaplain<br />
from 1711 to 1731. John Southerden Burn, The History of the French Walloon, Dutch and<br />
other Foreign Protestant Refugees settled in England (London: Longman, Brown, Green and<br />
Langmans, 1846).<br />
49 Letter of Ziegenhagen to A. H. Francke, London, 17 January 1724.