20.03.2013 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> XII<br />

the “Reformed irenicists”, theologians in the Elector’s pay who were<br />

prepared to deal gently with such enlightened <strong>Lutheran</strong>s as were prepared to<br />

give up the Real Presence in the Eucharist and the Christology of the genus<br />

majestaticum. 14 All the way from John Sigismund to the Prussian Union of<br />

the early 19 th century, the sentence once declared by pagan Rome, the<br />

judgement spoken against Luther by Charles V, was repeated against the<br />

loyal children of the <strong>Lutheran</strong> Reformation: Non licet esse vos, You have no<br />

right to exist!<br />

Most of nominal <strong>Lutheran</strong>ism on the European continent has long since<br />

been swallowed up hook, line and sinker into what Kurt Marquart describes<br />

as the black hole of union with the Reformed. The <strong>Lutheran</strong>s of North<br />

Germany could at least plead in mitigation the brutal persecuting efforts of<br />

the Hohenzollern State, but the nominal <strong>Lutheran</strong>s of North America can<br />

offer no such excuse. Two distinct models for being <strong>Lutheran</strong> have been<br />

available since the early decades of the 19 th century. On the one hand, the<br />

Hohenzollern paradigm was advocated with democratic wrappings by S. S.<br />

Schmucker with his programme of “American <strong>Lutheran</strong>ism”. Alas, the great<br />

majority of North American <strong>Lutheran</strong>s now unblushingly walk the path<br />

signposted by Schmucker, which involves the wholesale surrender of the<br />

second pattern of reformation in favour of some conflation of the third and<br />

fifth patterns that emerged five centuries ago. On the other hand, the heirs of<br />

Krauth and Walther and of Löhe’s Sendlinge find themselves at odds with<br />

the prevailing religious culture as they confess Christ in partibus infidelium.<br />

Even within the conservative <strong>Lutheran</strong> synods powerful forces would join<br />

with the Hohenzollerns and Schmucker in hacking down the venerable<br />

ecclesial tree with fivefold root. Our only justification for seeking the<br />

conservation and flourishing of this tree is the conviction that the young<br />

professor who issued his 95 Theses 483 years ago was faithful to Christ and<br />

His Word as he sought to reconfigure the inter-relation of Scripture, office,<br />

and rule/confession in the life of the Church. On this anniversary night we<br />

may not indulge in cheap triumphalism, for all Western Christendom,<br />

including our own, is currently gripped in deep crisis, engulfed in dreadful<br />

desolation. Five centuries ago those who advocated all six patterns of<br />

reformation were agreed that Almighty God is all-holy and His wrath to be<br />

feared. As we now enter the fourth century of so-called Enlightenment, this<br />

consensus has broken down so that even the religious forces active within<br />

14 See the closing chapters of Nischan’s Prince, People, and Confession, and the same<br />

writer’s <strong>Lutheran</strong>s and Calvinists in the Age of Confessionalism (Brookfield, VT: Ashgate<br />

Publishing Company, 1999) chapters 12 and 13. These meticulously researched volumes,<br />

containing a wealth of otherwise inaccessible data and written from a bitterly anti-<strong>Lutheran</strong><br />

perspective, are must reading for all seminarians and clergy who care a fig for confessional<br />

integrity!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!