LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
54 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> XII<br />
the “Reformed irenicists”, theologians in the Elector’s pay who were<br />
prepared to deal gently with such enlightened <strong>Lutheran</strong>s as were prepared to<br />
give up the Real Presence in the Eucharist and the Christology of the genus<br />
majestaticum. 14 All the way from John Sigismund to the Prussian Union of<br />
the early 19 th century, the sentence once declared by pagan Rome, the<br />
judgement spoken against Luther by Charles V, was repeated against the<br />
loyal children of the <strong>Lutheran</strong> Reformation: Non licet esse vos, You have no<br />
right to exist!<br />
Most of nominal <strong>Lutheran</strong>ism on the European continent has long since<br />
been swallowed up hook, line and sinker into what Kurt Marquart describes<br />
as the black hole of union with the Reformed. The <strong>Lutheran</strong>s of North<br />
Germany could at least plead in mitigation the brutal persecuting efforts of<br />
the Hohenzollern State, but the nominal <strong>Lutheran</strong>s of North America can<br />
offer no such excuse. Two distinct models for being <strong>Lutheran</strong> have been<br />
available since the early decades of the 19 th century. On the one hand, the<br />
Hohenzollern paradigm was advocated with democratic wrappings by S. S.<br />
Schmucker with his programme of “American <strong>Lutheran</strong>ism”. Alas, the great<br />
majority of North American <strong>Lutheran</strong>s now unblushingly walk the path<br />
signposted by Schmucker, which involves the wholesale surrender of the<br />
second pattern of reformation in favour of some conflation of the third and<br />
fifth patterns that emerged five centuries ago. On the other hand, the heirs of<br />
Krauth and Walther and of Löhe’s Sendlinge find themselves at odds with<br />
the prevailing religious culture as they confess Christ in partibus infidelium.<br />
Even within the conservative <strong>Lutheran</strong> synods powerful forces would join<br />
with the Hohenzollerns and Schmucker in hacking down the venerable<br />
ecclesial tree with fivefold root. Our only justification for seeking the<br />
conservation and flourishing of this tree is the conviction that the young<br />
professor who issued his 95 Theses 483 years ago was faithful to Christ and<br />
His Word as he sought to reconfigure the inter-relation of Scripture, office,<br />
and rule/confession in the life of the Church. On this anniversary night we<br />
may not indulge in cheap triumphalism, for all Western Christendom,<br />
including our own, is currently gripped in deep crisis, engulfed in dreadful<br />
desolation. Five centuries ago those who advocated all six patterns of<br />
reformation were agreed that Almighty God is all-holy and His wrath to be<br />
feared. As we now enter the fourth century of so-called Enlightenment, this<br />
consensus has broken down so that even the religious forces active within<br />
14 See the closing chapters of Nischan’s Prince, People, and Confession, and the same<br />
writer’s <strong>Lutheran</strong>s and Calvinists in the Age of Confessionalism (Brookfield, VT: Ashgate<br />
Publishing Company, 1999) chapters 12 and 13. These meticulously researched volumes,<br />
containing a wealth of otherwise inaccessible data and written from a bitterly anti-<strong>Lutheran</strong><br />
perspective, are must reading for all seminarians and clergy who care a fig for confessional<br />
integrity!