20.03.2013 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STEPHENSON: THE ROOTS OF THE REFORMATION 49<br />

which they remained firmly and courageously loyal. 8 In the long run,<br />

however, all three groups were subjugated as the <strong>Lutheran</strong> Faith was almost<br />

wholly wiped out from Bandenburg-Prussia by the Reformed House of<br />

Hohenzollern, that dynasty from hell. A line of usurping summi episcopi<br />

backed up by the imperially sanctioned cuius regio eius religio were able to<br />

hack down a tree rooted in deep revulsion against the imperial papacy of the<br />

Cluniac reform.<br />

(2) If Luther had entered the Dominican Order and been schooled in the<br />

basically Augustinian anthropology and soteriology of Thomas Aquinas, his<br />

theological development would not have taken the shape it did. The sole<br />

satisfactory explanation of Martin’s decision to enter the Order of<br />

Augustinian Eremites is that it alone among the monastic houses of the city<br />

of Erfurt offered its inmates a theological education in the spirit of the via<br />

moderna. The followers of Thomas Aquinas (1224-1274), Bonaventura<br />

(1217-1274), and Duns Scotus (ca. 1265-1308) were lumped together among<br />

the advocates of the ancient way, the via antiqua, while theologians who<br />

took their cue from William of Ockham were the avant-garde modernists of<br />

the day, the divines of the via moderna. Throughout his life Luther would<br />

acknowledge an ongoing epistemological debt to Ockham, gladly labelling<br />

himself a modernist, a terminist, or a nominalist. Heiko Oberman is disposed<br />

to see in nominalism well nigh the chief root of the <strong>Lutheran</strong> Reformation.<br />

But if Luther followed his nominalist teachers in their philosophical<br />

epistemology, he radically repudiated the leading theologians of the via<br />

moderna where their anthropology and soteriology were concerned. William<br />

of Ockham rejoiced that God graciously provided salvation to fallen<br />

mankind through His potentia ordinata realized in the Incarnation and the<br />

Church, but he considered that, if push came to shove, men could earn<br />

salvation through loving God above all things by their natural powers. And<br />

the Tübingen divine Gabriel Biel (†1495) taught that “facienti quod in se est,<br />

Deus non denegat gratiam”, which being interpreted is roughly the<br />

encouragement, “If you do your very best, Almighty God will do the rest.”<br />

The via moderna was the most Pelagian school of late mediaeval theology,<br />

and its teaching was geared to exacerbate Luther’s scruples and plunge him<br />

into the depths of despair. The new Wittenberg theology developed as Dr<br />

Martin expounded Romans and Galatians, and strong attacks were mounted<br />

on the Pelagian tendencies of the via moderna, supremely but not<br />

exclusively in the 97 Theses of 4 September 1517. At this stage of his career<br />

Luther steps onto the stage clad in the mantle of St Augustine. The bottom<br />

line here is his conviction of the servum arbitrium, the enslaved will which<br />

can do nothing to promote its reconciliation with God. Within a decade<br />

8 Bodo Nischan, Prince, People, and Confession; The Second Reformation in Brandenburg<br />

(Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994) 161-203.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!