LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
32 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> XII<br />
As we shall see in the next section, this line of thinking—focussing on<br />
Christ as the active agent in salvation, over against the passive human role—<br />
also helps to clarify Paul’s line of thinking at Galatians 3:22ff. As far as<br />
Galatians 2:15-21 is concerned, however, understanding pi,stij Cristou/<br />
( vIhsou~) in a subjective manner seems to clarify the whole passage by<br />
highlighting Paul’s absolute contrast between anthropocentric “works of<br />
law” and theocentric “faith of Christ”.<br />
c) Galatians 3:22<br />
Even though this verse follows shortly after the passage discussed above, a<br />
new factor has to be considered: the extended emphasis on Abraham<br />
throughout the intervening section. Because Richard Hays’ interpretation of<br />
this whole section, Galatians 3-4, sheds much light on its difficulties, his<br />
analysis provides a good place to enter the text.<br />
The main problem of Galatians 3, according to Hays, is the dissonance<br />
between 3:6-14, which seem to suggest that every believer who shares<br />
Abraham’s faith is his heir, and 3:16-29, which identify Christ as the only<br />
“seed” of Abraham. 37 Hays attempts to solve this problem by identifying a<br />
narrative structure running from 3:1-4:11. The controlling idea of the whole<br />
section is found in 3:1—Paul’s reference to Jesus Christ being publicly<br />
exhibited as crucified—the brevity of which suggests that Paul is operating<br />
“in the mode of recapitulation”. 38 Thus, Paul still expects his readers to be<br />
hearing echoes of the Gospel about Christ—even when Abraham seems to<br />
be front and centre in the discussion in 3:6-14. 39<br />
Can this argument be sustained? Can Christ really be the central figure in<br />
Paul’s thinking, even in 3:6-14? Hays’ exegesis shows how, first of all<br />
interpreting oi` evk pi,stewj in 3:6 as “those who are given life on the basis of<br />
(Christ’s) faith”—a major departure from the usual reading which<br />
understands oi` evk pi,stewj as if it were equivalent to oi` pisteu,ontej (“the<br />
believing ones”) or o[soi pisteu,ousin (“those who believe”). 40 As Hays says,<br />
though, “as the discussion unfolds, it becomes clear … that these people<br />
share the blessing not because their faith imitates Abraham’s faith, but<br />
because they participate in Christ, who is Abraham’s ‘seed.’” 41 He stresses<br />
37 Hays, Faith of Jesus Christ 194-95.<br />
38 Hays, Faith of Jesus Christ 198.<br />
39 As we saw before in the discussion of 3:5, understanding that verse’s difficult concluding<br />
phrase evx avkoh/j pi,stewj as meaning “through the proclamation which evokes faith” is yet<br />
another invocation of the story of Christ, further suggesting that Christ is being “imported”<br />
into the subsequent discussion about Abraham. Note also, in this connection, Paul’s use of<br />
kaqw,j to make such a linkage explicit at 3:6.<br />
40 Hays, Faith of Jesus Christ 200-1.<br />
41 Hays, Faith of Jesus Christ 202.