LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

concordiasem.ab.ca
from concordiasem.ab.ca More from this publisher
20.03.2013 Views

28 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XII 1 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel; it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who has faith, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. 17 For in it the righteousness of God is revealed through faith for faith [evk pi,stewj eivj pi,stin); as it is written, “The one who is righteous will live by faith” [~O de. di,kaioj evk pi,stewj zh,setai]. The problem is, who is “the one who is righteous” in v.17b? According to v. 17a, it is clearly someone who reveals the righteousness of God (“through faith, for faith”)—but otherwise this person is not clearly identified in the text. Even so, there are two good reasons to suggest that “the one who is righteous” and who reveals God’s righteousness “through faith, for faith” is Christ Himself. The first argument flows from the phrase o` di,kaioj—part of Paul’s quote from Habakkuk 2:4, and the subject of the Gospel in 1:17. Richard Hays suggests that o` di,kaioj is best understood as a messianic title in the NT. Not only do other NT texts explicitly apply the title to Jesus (Acts 3:14, 7:52, 22:14; I Pet. 3:18, I Jn 2:1), but the expression is clearly messianic already in I Enoch 38:2 and Isaiah 53:11. Furthermore, according to Hays, the LXX version of Habakkuk 2:4 in particular “would have appeared to Paul as unmistakably messianic” due to the translators’ use of masculine pronouns and participles throughout Habakkuk 2:3-4. 26 As Hays explains, this insight—seeing Christ, not the believer, as “the righteous one” who lives by faith, not only here in Romans 1:17 but also in Galatians 3:11—improves the flow of Paul’s argument tremendously by reinforcing the theo- and christocentric character of God’s salvation. 27 The second argument concerns the expression “through faith, for faith” (evk pi,stewj eivj pi,stin, 1:17a). The meaning of the phrase is admittedly difficult, yet there is good reason to propose that it ought to be read with primary reference to Christ’s faith(fulness), not the believer’s. His faithfulness then becomes the instrument by which God’s righteousness is revealed “in the Gospel”—a view which keeps the focus squarely fixed on the Gospel, apart from its reception, and also coheres well with Paul’s previous statements in 1:3 that the Gospel is “concerning [God’s] Son” and in 1:9 that it is “the Gospel of His Son”. 28 This second argument stemming from Romans 1:17, then, reinforces the first: both of them together suggesting that Christ’s faith(fulness), not the believer’s, is the focus of Paul’s thinking not only at 1:17 but also at 3:20-26. From 1:17 onward, the 26 Hays, Faith of Jesus Christ 151. 27 Hays’ full explanation of o` di,kaioj is found in Faith of Jesus Christ 151-58. Similar interpretations are advanced by Wallis 79-82; Hooker, “PISTIS CRISTOU”, 336; Markus Barth, “The Faith of the Messiah”, Heythrop Journal 10 (1969): 373-70; and especially Luke T. Johnson, “Romans 3:21-26 and the Faith of Jesus”, CBQ 44 (1982): 77-90. 28 Campbell 115.

CHAMBERS: PISTIS CRISTOU IN PAUL primary contrast Paul has in mind would therefore be consistent: humanity’s faithlessness (avpisti,a, 3:3) versus the faithfulness of God (th.n pi,stin tou/ qeou/, 3:3) in Christ. b) Galatians 2:16 (twice), 20 The second cluster of passages is in Galatians 2. Once again we begin by considering the NRSV’s optional “subjective” translation. 2 15 We ourselves are Jews by birth and not Gentile sinners; 16 yet we know that a person is justified not by the works of the law but through the faith of Jesus Christ [dia. pi,stewj VIhsou/ Cristou/]. And we have come to believe in Christ Jesus [kai. h`mei/j eivj Cristo.n VIhsou/n evpisteu,samen], so that we might be justified by the faith of Christ [i[na dikaiwqw/men evk pi,stewj Cristou/], and not by doing the works of the law, because no one will be justified by the works of the law… . 19 For through the law I died to the law, so that I might live to God. I have been crucified with Christ; 20 and it is no longer I who live, but it is Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God [evn pi,stei zw/ th/| tou/ ui`ou/ tou/ qeou/], who loved me and gave himself for me. 21 I do not nullify the grace of God; for if justification comes through the law, then Christ died for nothing. As Richard Hays notes, this paragraph “provides a highly-condensed summary of the ‘thesis’ that Paul intends to argue in the subsequent chapters … . There is a sense in which all of Galatians 3 and 4 can be read as Paul’s ‘exegesis’ of the concise authoritative formulations of 2:16.” 29 That thesis is clearly inherent in the contrast expressed in 2:16. The question is, however, what are the two poles within that contrast? There are several possibilities. The traditional “objective” reading of 2:16 understands the contrast as lying between “works of the law” and “faith in [Jesus] Christ”— but in a particular sense, emphasizing the leading word in each expression, “works” and “faith”. There are, however, several problems with this view, as Ian Wallis points out. Faith, in and of itself, is hardly a Christian innovation; the newer and more nuanced reading of Judaism which has come to the fore in the last several decades has exposed the fallacy of assuming that pre-Christian Judaism knew nothing of grace or faith but was merely characterized by legalism. 30 Furthermore, given the emphasis that Paul places on his own “conversion experience” in Galatians 1:11-17, it would seem odd for him to place more emphasis here on the human response to God’s initiative than upon that overwhelming initiative itself. The more fundamental contrast, 29 Hays, Faith of Jesus Christ 141. 30 See especially the groundbreaking work by E. P. Sanders, Paul and Palestinian Judaism (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977). 29

28 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> XII<br />

1 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel; it is the power of God for salvation to<br />

everyone who has faith, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. 17 For in it the<br />

righteousness of God is revealed through faith for faith [evk pi,stewj eivj<br />

pi,stin); as it is written, “The one who is righteous will live by faith” [~O de.<br />

di,kaioj evk pi,stewj zh,setai].<br />

The problem is, who is “the one who is righteous” in v.17b? According to v.<br />

17a, it is clearly someone who reveals the righteousness of God (“through<br />

faith, for faith”)—but otherwise this person is not clearly identified in the<br />

text. Even so, there are two good reasons to suggest that “the one who is<br />

righteous” and who reveals God’s righteousness “through faith, for faith” is<br />

Christ Himself.<br />

The first argument flows from the phrase o` di,kaioj—part of Paul’s quote<br />

from Habakkuk 2:4, and the subject of the Gospel in 1:17. Richard Hays<br />

suggests that o` di,kaioj is best understood as a messianic title in the NT. Not<br />

only do other NT texts explicitly apply the title to Jesus (Acts 3:14, 7:52,<br />

22:14; I Pet. 3:18, I Jn 2:1), but the expression is clearly messianic already in<br />

I Enoch 38:2 and Isaiah 53:11. Furthermore, according to Hays, the LXX<br />

version of Habakkuk 2:4 in particular “would have appeared to Paul as<br />

unmistakably messianic” due to the translators’ use of masculine pronouns<br />

and participles throughout Habakkuk 2:3-4. 26 As Hays explains, this<br />

insight—seeing Christ, not the believer, as “the righteous one” who lives by<br />

faith, not only here in Romans 1:17 but also in Galatians 3:11—improves the<br />

flow of Paul’s argument tremendously by reinforcing the theo- and<br />

christocentric character of God’s salvation. 27<br />

The second argument concerns the expression “through faith, for faith”<br />

(evk pi,stewj eivj pi,stin, 1:17a). The meaning of the phrase is admittedly<br />

difficult, yet there is good reason to propose that it ought to be read with<br />

primary reference to Christ’s faith(fulness), not the believer’s. His<br />

faithfulness then becomes the instrument by which God’s righteousness is<br />

revealed “in the Gospel”—a view which keeps the focus squarely fixed on<br />

the Gospel, apart from its reception, and also coheres well with Paul’s<br />

previous statements in 1:3 that the Gospel is “concerning [God’s] Son” and<br />

in 1:9 that it is “the Gospel of His Son”. 28 This second argument stemming<br />

from Romans 1:17, then, reinforces the first: both of them together<br />

suggesting that Christ’s faith(fulness), not the believer’s, is the focus of<br />

Paul’s thinking not only at 1:17 but also at 3:20-26. From 1:17 onward, the<br />

26 Hays, Faith of Jesus Christ 151.<br />

27 Hays’ full explanation of o` di,kaioj is found in Faith of Jesus Christ 151-58. Similar<br />

interpretations are advanced by Wallis 79-82; Hooker, “PISTIS CRISTOU”, 336; Markus<br />

Barth, “The Faith of the Messiah”, Heythrop Journal 10 (1969): 373-70; and especially Luke<br />

T. Johnson, “Romans 3:21-26 and the Faith of Jesus”, CBQ 44 (1982): 77-90.<br />

28 Campbell 115.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!