20.03.2013 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Concordia Lutheran Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WILLIAMS: THE EUCHARIST IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 101<br />

well-known cultic ritual within their worship. 37 What is more, since the city<br />

of Mt Zion in 10:22 is set in contrast with the Old Covenant’s Mt Sinai, it is<br />

clear that the final eternal reign of God is to be seen in contrast to the Old<br />

Covenant, rather than with the present life of the believer.<br />

Swetnam further notes that in v. 8, the author of Hebrews states that the<br />

Old Covenant still “has relevance ‘for the present time’”, 38 What can such<br />

relevance be? Swetnam looks carefully at the peculiar reference in 9:8 which<br />

refer to the “matter of food and drink and various ceremonial washings”<br />

which are “not able to clear the conscience”. Are these merely a random<br />

“loose and deprecatory reference to the purity laws of the Old Testament”, 39<br />

examples of the “external regulations” of the old Covenant meant to<br />

illustrate the “burdensome” nature of the Old Covenant from which Christ<br />

sets us free (9:15)? Noting how such a conclusion does not seem likely from<br />

a skilled and polished writer such as the author of Hebrews, 40 Swetnam<br />

argues for a more precise reason for the 9:8 reference. He believes that<br />

“foods” and “drinks” and “cleansings” are mentioned because they are<br />

viewed as being the OT foreshadowing of Christ’s Eucharistic Body and<br />

Blood and of baptism. 41 He further notes that these OT ceremonies are in<br />

9:10 described, “until the present” to be evpikei,mena. Taking this term to<br />

mean to “lay upon” or “lay athwart”, as a stone is over a grave so that<br />

entrance to it is blocked off, he interprets 9:9-10 to say:<br />

This is symbolic, pointing to the present time. According to the symbolism<br />

gifts and sacrifices are brought which cannot give the worshipper inward<br />

fulfilment, lying athwart (evpikei,mena) only foods and drinks and various<br />

cleansings as rites of the flesh until the time of the setting straight (me,cri<br />

kairou/ diorqw,sewj).<br />

In other words, Swetnam states the text to say that the OT rituals were<br />

“blocked off” by the Old Law rites of sacrifice connected with the day of<br />

Atonement”, and because the OT Day of Atonement was “unable to expiate<br />

sin, the various rituals of the OT which flowed from the expiation were<br />

powerless to give the worshipper ritual fulfilment, i.e., definite union with<br />

God.” 42 Such powerless cultic ceremonies are therefore not swept away by<br />

Christ to find fulfilment in a non-cultic New Covenant. Rather, Christ’s<br />

atonement unblocks, “sets straight”, and gives power to the food, drink, and<br />

37 It is to be noted that in 10:28 the author of Hebrews tells his hearers, that since they have<br />

come to Mt Zion, they “are receiving the kingdom”, and that they are now to “worship God<br />

acceptably”.<br />

38 Swetnam, “Imagery” 155.<br />

39 Attridge 243.<br />

40 Swetnam, “Imagery” 156ff.<br />

41 Swetnam, “Imagery” 158.<br />

42 Swetnam, “Imagery” 158.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!