FRESH WATER - Taranaki Regional Council

FRESH WATER - Taranaki Regional Council FRESH WATER - Taranaki Regional Council

20.03.2013 Views

Daryl Gibson and Maitahi wetland. REGENERATION AND NEW GENERATION Regeneration is becoming a generation game at the Maitahi wetland near _ Okato. The wetland spans the dairy farms of Merv Hooker and Bernard and Pauline Gibson who, over a number of years, have achieved a transformation by fencing indigenous vegetation, establishing new plantings and carrying out willow control. And now the Gibson farm is passing on to the next generation – but the environmental commitment endures. “It’s been a good project to be involved in and our son, who’s taking over the farm, is keen to carry it on,” said Pauline. Merv Hooker agreed, saying it’s been gratifying to see the re-growth of the plant life along with increasing numbers of birds. The Taranaki wetlands included one surrounded by the Egmont National Park (Potaema) and one surrounded by native vegetation (Lake Rotokare). Neither of these sites showed much evidence of impacts from human activities, introduced plants or animals and so consequently obtained high overall scores. Two other sites, Barretts Lagoon and Umutekai wetland are located in rural settings, and consequently show some evidence of changes in hydrology through the invasion of some dry land plants, and impacts of weeds. These results establish a baseline from which future monitoring can be undertaken. (C) STREAMS The natural character of Taranaki ring plain streams and rivers as they fl ow from the mountain to the sea is that they meander often in deeply incised channels. This is a result of centuries of erosion, which has resulted in a stable river channel. A meandering stream includes a diverse range of habitat types – deep pools, shallow riffl e areas, areas of faster running water. Different species of fi sh have different preferences for these habitat types. 73 Unpublished data. Rob Tucker “This area on our farm was regarded as waste land, and to have it fenced off to protect the plant and bird life has given myself and others great pleasure,” he said. Both properties are also protected with a Memorandum of Encumbrance on their titles, to ensure the environmental enhancement is protected long into the future. Although comparatively small at just 7.5 ha and no more than 10 m across at any one point, the Maitahi wetland is a regionally signifi cant wetland. It makes a dramatic appearance in countryside dominated by pasture lands, and contains a large variety of wetland vegetation and habitat. Plant varieties include m _ ahoe, cabbage trees, raupo, sedges and fl ax and among the birdlife are the rarely seen Australasian bittern and the spotless crake. The vegetation acts as a natural riparian fi lter for the Maitahi Stream at an important location close to the coast, where water quality is generally lower than at higher altitudes. The restoration project began in 2002 and has been assisted by a Taranaki Regional Council grant of $24,400 to help meet the costs of fencing and willow control. In 2004, young people from the Conservation Corps carried out fencing, planting and spraying work at the wetlands. “Our programme relies on projects like this to teach young people work skills,” said John Bowie of the New Plymouth YMCA, which co-ordinates the Conservation Corps. For the Gibsons and Hookers, that just adds to the positive nature of the project. Small streams can provide habitat for rare invertebrate and fi sh species, and can also play an important ecological role, such as providing spawning sites for lamprey, and refuge from large fl oods in the main stem rivers. For example, a fi sh survey undertaken in an unnamed tributary of the Waiwhakaiho River, immediately after a large fl ood, found over 50 redfi n bullies taking refuge in a 70 m reach 73 . Also recorded were three adult eels that sought shelter while migrating downstream to spawn at sea. A later survey undertaken during normal fl ows recorded a much lower fi sh abundance. Increasing intensifi cation of land use on the Taranaki ring plain continues to see pressures being placed on the natural character of small streams and rivers. Landowners, particularly in South Taranaki, are increasingly undertaking land development by realigning or straightening sections of streams, or undertaking land reclamation through piping small streams. Recontouring these areas into land for grazing increases effective production hectares. The amount of piping of small streams or stream modifi cation that has been consented over the past fi ve years is set out in Table 4.31. State of the Environment Report 2009 133

134 FRESH WATER Table 4.31. Number of consents issued for stream modifi cation, and extent of stream affected, over the past fi ve years. Year: (1 Nov to 30 Oct) This shows that there have been a total of 59 consents issued for the culverting of a total of 25 km of stream, and 28 consents issued for the realignment of almost 7 km of stream. Certain catchments have been particularly affected such as the recontouring of 350 m of swampy headwaters at the top of the Rawa Stream and the piping of over 5,000 m of tributaries in the Taikatu catchment. This is likely to represent a small fraction of work being undertaken in the region as some land development work is a permitted activity. The Taranaki Regional Council has commenced a research investigation to examine the extent and likely environmental effects of this type of activity. (D) FRESHWATER FISH Taranaki rivers and streams support a diverse range of native fi sh species as well as some introduced species such as brown trout. The most well known native fi sh are two species of eels, fi ve species of bullies, and six species of the whitebait (galaxiid) family. Other species include torrentfi sh, lamprey, common smelt, mullet and mudfi sh. A special feature of Taranaki’s native freshwater fi sh is that 15 of the 18 known species are diadromous – in other words, they have a marine or estuarine stage in their lifecycle and migrate to and from the sea. While the greatest variety of native fi sh is generally found in the lowest reaches of rivers and streams, the entire stream length provides habitat for different species’ important habitats. For example, fi sh species such 74 Taranaki Regional Council, 2001. Dams, Weirs and Other Barriers to Fish Passage in Taranaki. 75 Leathwick, J. Julian, K. Elith, J. Rowe, D. 2008. Predicting the Distributions of Freshwater Fish Species for all New Zealand’s Rivers and Streams. Prepared by NIWA for the Department of Conservation. 76 Department of Conservation, unpublished data. TARANAKI – WHERE WE STAND Culverting/piping of streams Stream realignment No. of consents Length of stream (m) No. of consents Length of stream (m) 2003-04 7 1,270 1 10 2004-05 8 2,618 3 480 2005-06 11 4,250 5 1,080 2006-07 16 10,970 4 1,440 2007-08 17 6,420 15 3,807 TOTAL 59 25,528 28 6,817 Giant k _ okopu (Galaxias argenteus). Taranaki Regional Council as inanga are more likely to be found in lowland streams that provide gentle fl owing and well-vegetated habitats (see Figure 4.39a which shows where they are predicted to be found and where they have actually been found). K _ oaro, on the other hand, prefer the cascading rocky habitats found further up the catchment and the forested cover provided by the Egmont National Park (illustrated in Figure 4.39b) 75 . Structures in waterways have the potential to impact on fi sh migration but can be modifi ed or designed in such a way as to allow fi sh to navigate over, or through them (via fi sh passes). The Taranaki Regional Council created an inventory of all known structures that may affect fi sh passage and recorded information such as current use, resource consent status, ownership, effects on fi sh passage and historical values. One hundred and eight major dams, weirs and other barriers fi sh passage were identifi ed 74 . This inventory has been reviewed and changes since 2001 are set out in Table 4.32. Thirty nine structures (36%) have resource consents and either an adequate fi sh pass or do not impede fi sh passage, so no further action is required. Of the 26 consented structures requiring further action, two have been removed and eight have had fi sh passes installed or had fi sh passage improved, but still need monitoring. Of the 30 unconsented structures requiring further action, six have gained consent and four of these have had fi sh passage improved, but still need monitoring. There remain fi ve structures without resource consents that are ‘orphaned’ and have no current use and no party willing to take ownership and may therefore be removed. In total, 12 structures have had works undertaken to improve fi sh passage. Table 4.32: Dams, weirs and other barriers to fi sh passage in Taranaki. 2001 2008 Consented structures requiring no action 37 39 Consented structures that require further action/monitoring 26 30 Unconsented structures – no further action required 10 10 Unconsented structures that require further action/monitoring 30 24 Unconsented structures that have no owner 5 5

Daryl Gibson and Maitahi wetland.<br />

REGENERATION AND<br />

NEW GENERATION<br />

Regeneration is becoming a generation game at the Maitahi wetland<br />

near _ Okato.<br />

The wetland spans the dairy farms of Merv Hooker and Bernard<br />

and Pauline Gibson who, over a number of years, have achieved a<br />

transformation by fencing indigenous vegetation, establishing new<br />

plantings and carrying out willow control.<br />

And now the Gibson farm is passing on to the next generation – but<br />

the environmental commitment endures.<br />

“It’s been a good project to be involved in and our son, who’s taking<br />

over the farm, is keen to carry it on,” said Pauline.<br />

Merv Hooker agreed, saying it’s been gratifying to see the re-growth<br />

of the plant life along with increasing numbers of birds.<br />

The <strong>Taranaki</strong> wetlands included one surrounded by the Egmont National<br />

Park (Potaema) and one surrounded by native vegetation (Lake Rotokare).<br />

Neither of these sites showed much evidence of impacts from human<br />

activities, introduced plants or animals and so consequently obtained<br />

high overall scores. Two other sites, Barretts Lagoon and Umutekai<br />

wetland are located in rural settings, and consequently show some<br />

evidence of changes in hydrology through the invasion of some dry land<br />

plants, and impacts of weeds. These results establish a baseline from<br />

which future monitoring can be undertaken.<br />

(C) STREAMS<br />

The natural character of <strong>Taranaki</strong> ring plain streams and rivers as<br />

they fl ow from the mountain to the sea is that they meander often in<br />

deeply incised channels. This is a result of centuries of erosion, which<br />

has resulted in a stable river channel. A meandering stream includes<br />

a diverse range of habitat types – deep pools, shallow riffl e areas,<br />

areas of faster running water. Different species of fi sh have different<br />

preferences for these habitat types.<br />

73 Unpublished data.<br />

Rob Tucker<br />

“This area on our farm was regarded as waste land, and to have<br />

it fenced off to protect the plant and bird life has given myself and<br />

others great pleasure,” he said.<br />

Both properties are also protected with a Memorandum of<br />

Encumbrance on their titles, to ensure the environmental<br />

enhancement is protected long into the future.<br />

Although comparatively small at just 7.5 ha and no more than 10 m<br />

across at any one point, the Maitahi wetland is a regionally signifi cant<br />

wetland.<br />

It makes a dramatic appearance in countryside dominated by pasture<br />

lands, and contains a large variety of wetland vegetation and habitat.<br />

Plant varieties include m _ ahoe, cabbage trees, raupo, sedges and fl ax<br />

and among the birdlife are the rarely seen Australasian bittern and the<br />

spotless crake.<br />

The vegetation acts as a natural riparian fi lter for the Maitahi Stream<br />

at an important location close to the coast, where water quality is<br />

generally lower than at higher altitudes.<br />

The restoration project began in 2002 and has been assisted by a<br />

<strong>Taranaki</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Council</strong> grant of $24,400 to help meet the costs of<br />

fencing and willow control.<br />

In 2004, young people from the Conservation Corps carried out<br />

fencing, planting and spraying work at the wetlands. “Our programme<br />

relies on projects like this to teach young people work skills,” said<br />

John Bowie of the New Plymouth YMCA, which co-ordinates the<br />

Conservation Corps.<br />

For the Gibsons and Hookers, that just adds to the positive nature of<br />

the project.<br />

Small streams can provide habitat for rare invertebrate and fi sh species,<br />

and can also play an important ecological role, such as providing<br />

spawning sites for lamprey, and refuge from large fl oods in the main<br />

stem rivers. For example, a fi sh survey undertaken in an unnamed<br />

tributary of the Waiwhakaiho River, immediately after a large fl ood,<br />

found over 50 redfi n bullies taking refuge in a 70 m reach 73 . Also<br />

recorded were three adult eels that sought shelter while migrating<br />

downstream to spawn at sea. A later survey undertaken during normal<br />

fl ows recorded a much lower fi sh abundance.<br />

Increasing intensifi cation of land use on the <strong>Taranaki</strong> ring plain continues<br />

to see pressures being placed on the natural character of small streams<br />

and rivers. Landowners, particularly in South <strong>Taranaki</strong>, are increasingly<br />

undertaking land development by realigning or straightening sections of<br />

streams, or undertaking land reclamation through piping small streams.<br />

Recontouring these areas into land for grazing increases effective<br />

production hectares.<br />

The amount of piping of small streams or stream modifi cation that<br />

has been consented over the past fi ve years is set out in Table 4.31.<br />

State of the Environment Report 2009<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!