Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage ... - Census Bureau
Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage ... - Census Bureau
Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage ... - Census Bureau
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>and</strong> 1.9 percent for women who • Smaller than the declines in earn- 1.4 million, respectively. For female<br />
worked full-time, year-round (from ings for the income years surround- workers with earnings, declines were<br />
$35,609 to $36,278). 27 In 2009, the ing the recession lasting from July evident in these age groups as well,<br />
female-to-male earnings ratio of full- 1990 to March 1991 (6.0 percent 766,000 <strong>and</strong> 1.3 million, respectively;<br />
time, year-round workers was 0.77, decline); the January 1980 to July while the number of female worknot<br />
statistically different from the 1980 <strong>and</strong> July 1981 to November ers 45 to 64 years old increased by<br />
2008 ratio (Table 1 <strong>and</strong> Figure 2). 1982 combined recessions (10.1 579,000 (Table A-5). 30<br />
Since 2007, the year before the most<br />
recent recession, the number of workpercent<br />
decline); <strong>and</strong> the November<br />
1973 to March 1975 recession (6.4<br />
percent decline).<br />
Declines were evident in the number<br />
of male workers with earnings<br />
29<br />
ing men with earnings decreased between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2009 within the<br />
by 2.5 million (from 84.5 million to Between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2009, the real educational attainment categories of<br />
81.9 million). The number of work- median earnings of full-time, year- some college, no degree (678,000<br />
ing women with earnings decreased round male workers increased by 1.0 decline), ninth to twelfth grade, nonby<br />
1.3 million (from 74.3 million percent (from $46,669 to $47,127); graduate (348,000 decline), <strong>and</strong> those<br />
to 73.0 million) (Figure 3 <strong>and</strong> Table the change was not statistically with less than a ninth grade educa-<br />
A-4). Between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2009, the significant for full-time, year-round tion (234,000 decline). Declines were<br />
real median earnings of male work- female workers, with a median of evident for female workers with earners<br />
declined by 4.1 percent (from $36,278 in 2009. However, between ings within the categories high school<br />
$37,898 to $36,331) <strong>and</strong> for female 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2009, the number of males graduate (639,000 decline) <strong>and</strong> some<br />
workers by 2.8 percent (from $26,770 working full-time, year-round with college, no degree (646,000 decline);<br />
to $26,030). Though the trough of earnings decreased by 6.9 million; the while female workers with an associthe<br />
recession that began in December number of females working full-time, ate’s degree or bachelor’s degree or<br />
2007 has not yet been defined, no year-round with earnings decreased more increased (gains of 365,000 <strong>and</strong><br />
other set of income years surround- by 2.4 million. Since the CPS ASEC is 514,000, respectively). 31<br />
ing the recessions dating from 1969<br />
to the present has experienced such<br />
a large decline in the number of<br />
workers, or in the percentage-point<br />
declines in the percentage of male<br />
<strong>and</strong> female full-time, year-round workers<br />
(Figure 3 <strong>and</strong> Tables 2 <strong>and</strong> A-4).<br />
In addition, 2007 to 2009 is the only<br />
period (dating from 1969 to present)<br />
showing a decline in women’s real<br />
median earnings. For men, the 2007<br />
to 2009 decline in real median earnings<br />
is:<br />
• Larger than the declines in earnings<br />
for the income years surrounding<br />
the March 2001 to November 2001<br />
recession (2.6 percent decline) <strong>and</strong><br />
the December 1969 to November<br />
1970 recession (2.2 percent<br />
decline).<br />
not a longitudinal survey, we cannot<br />
determine how the loss of these<br />
9.3 million workers (who worked<br />
full-time, year-round in 2007 <strong>and</strong> did<br />
not work in 2009, or who worked<br />
full-time, year-round in 2007 <strong>and</strong><br />
in 2009 worked less than full-time,<br />
year-round) affected median earnings<br />
(Tables 2 <strong>and</strong> A-4).<br />
Examining the change between 2007<br />
<strong>and</strong> 2009 in the number of workers<br />
with earnings by characteristics such<br />
as age, educational attainment, occupation,<br />
<strong>and</strong> class of worker shows<br />
that, in many cases, the number of<br />
male workers with earnings declined.<br />
Although the same can be said for<br />
their female counterparts, there were<br />
The occupation groups with sta-<br />
tistically significant declines in the<br />
number of male workers with earnings<br />
between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2009 were con-<br />
struction <strong>and</strong> extraction occupations<br />
(1.0 million decline), transportation<br />
<strong>and</strong> material-moving occupations<br />
(709,000 decline), production occupa-<br />
tions (634,000 decline), <strong>and</strong> sales <strong>and</strong><br />
related occupations (586,000 decline).<br />
Statistically significant declines in the<br />
number of female workers with earn-<br />
ings by occupation group occurred in<br />
management, business, <strong>and</strong> financial<br />
operations occupations (413,000<br />
decline); office <strong>and</strong> administrative sup-<br />
port occupations (1.3 million decline);<br />
<strong>and</strong> production occupations (712,000<br />
28<br />
some cases in which the number of<br />
female workers increased.<br />
30 The following differences among the<br />
declines in number of workers were not statisti-<br />
27 The differences among the percentage<br />
increases in the earnings of full-time, year-round<br />
working men compared with the increases for<br />
Between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2009, the number<br />
of male workers with earnings<br />
cally significant: the decline in the number of<br />
men 15 to 24 compared with the declines for<br />
men 25 to 44 <strong>and</strong> women 25 to 44, the decline<br />
total working women <strong>and</strong> women working fulltime,<br />
year-round were not statistically different.<br />
The difference between the 2009 median earnings<br />
in the age groups 15 to 24 <strong>and</strong> 25<br />
to 44 declined by 1.3 million <strong>and</strong><br />
in the number of men 25 to 44 compared with<br />
the declines for women 15 to 24 <strong>and</strong> 25 to 44,<br />
the decline in the number of women 15 to 24<br />
of all working men <strong>and</strong> of full-time, year-round<br />
compared with that for women 25 to 44.<br />
working women was not statistically significant.<br />
31 All of the differences among the declines<br />
28 The difference between the declines in 29 The difference between the declines in discussed in this paragraph were not statistically<br />
earnings for the income years surrounding the earnings for income years surrounding the July significant. In addition, the differences between<br />
March 2001 <strong>and</strong> November 2001 recession <strong>and</strong> 1990 to March 1991 recession <strong>and</strong> the the increases in the number of women with an<br />
the December 1969 to November 1970 recession November 1973 to March 1975 recession was associate’s degree <strong>and</strong> those with a bachelor’s<br />
was not statistically significant. not statistically significant. degree were not statistically significant.<br />
12 <strong>Income</strong>, <strong>Poverty</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Coverage</strong> in the United States: 2009 U.S. <strong>Census</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>