Download PDF version - Munich Re
Download PDF version - Munich Re
Download PDF version - Munich Re
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Munich</strong> <strong>Re</strong> <strong>Re</strong>port of the Board of Management<br />
Another very large allocation was made to the claims equalization<br />
provisions and similar provisions; at DM 984 million, this was even larger<br />
than the previous year’s very sizeable allocation of DM 798 million. In<br />
particular, the sum allocated to the provision for earthquake risks was<br />
substantially larger than in the previous year, when withdrawals for<br />
earthquakes in the USA (Los Angeles) and Japan (Kobe) resulted in<br />
only a small overall increase.<br />
In the case of the <strong>Munich</strong> <strong>Re</strong>insurance Company, it was again possible<br />
to make very large special allocations to the provision for outstanding<br />
claims, amounting to DM 500 million (previous year: DM 250 million).<br />
The reinsurance companies’ pre-tax profit for the year increased from<br />
DM 222 million in the previous year to DM 679 million in the year under<br />
review; this represents an improvement of more than 200 %.<br />
The important figures for the reinsurers in DM million (consolidated):<br />
1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96<br />
Gross premiums 14,816 16,682 19,059 18,848 18,507<br />
Net premiums 12,730 14,385 16,750 16,531 16,526<br />
Underwriting result* –1,454 –1,652 –746 –562 98<br />
Investment result* 2,612 2,317 2,857 2,745 3,174<br />
Unadjusted earnings 379 664 1.097 1,270 2,163<br />
Special allocations to the provision<br />
for outstanding claims –125 –450 –350 –250 –500<br />
Change in the claims equalization<br />
provisions and similar provisions –40 –33 –523 –798 –984<br />
Operating result 214 181 224 222 679<br />
* The figures for the years 1991/92 to 1993/94 are comparable only to some extent with those<br />
for the years 1994/95 and 1995/96 owing to the change in the allocation of the expenses for<br />
employees’ pensions and “other depreciation”.<br />
17