A Coarse Grained DNA Model: Twist/Writhe Partitioning in DNA ...
A Coarse Grained DNA Model: Twist/Writhe Partitioning in DNA ...
A Coarse Grained DNA Model: Twist/Writhe Partitioning in DNA ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
A <strong>Coarse</strong> <strong>Gra<strong>in</strong>ed</strong> <strong>DNA</strong> <strong>Model</strong>:<br />
<strong>Twist</strong>/<strong>Writhe</strong> <strong>Partition<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>DNA</strong> M<strong>in</strong>icircles<br />
Mehmet Sayar<br />
College of Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Koç University,<br />
İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Novel Simulation Approaches to Soft Matter Systems<br />
September 20 - 24, 2010<br />
Dresden, Germany<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
Supercoil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>DNA</strong><br />
Lauren Polder. From Kornberg, A. and Baker, T.A., <strong>DNA</strong> Replication (2nd ed.), p. 36, W.H. Freeman (1992)<br />
Understand<strong>in</strong>g the supercoil formation energetics/dynamics <strong>in</strong> <strong>DNA</strong> molecule is<br />
key to resolv<strong>in</strong>g several important features of <strong>DNA</strong> such as the structure-function<br />
relationship, the melt<strong>in</strong>g behaviour, twist-writhe <strong>in</strong>terplay.<br />
Computer simulations can play a major role <strong>in</strong> tackl<strong>in</strong>g these problems.<br />
Current elastic rod models cannot properly account for the helical nature and<br />
hybridization of the <strong>DNA</strong> molecule.<br />
Computationally efficient coarse-gra<strong>in</strong>ed models are essential for simulat<strong>in</strong>g large<br />
enough systems for long enough times.<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
Length 90 bps<br />
Full atomistic MD<br />
simulation us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a 400 core cluster<br />
AMBER-99 force field<br />
L:<strong>DNA</strong> length<br />
l p :persistence length<br />
Lk:l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g number<br />
Lk o :relaxed l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g number<br />
σ= Lk−Lk o <br />
Lk o<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
<strong>DNA</strong> m<strong>in</strong>icircle<br />
Harris S.A., et.al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2008, Vol. 36, No. 1 21–29<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
<strong>DNA</strong> under Torsion<br />
Harris S.A., et.al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2008, Vol. 36, No. 1 21–29<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
<strong>Coarse</strong>-<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong>ed</strong> <strong>Model</strong> of <strong>DNA</strong><br />
Full-atomistic model Fitt<strong>in</strong>g Superatoms <strong>Coarse</strong>-gra<strong>in</strong>ed model<br />
S. B. Dixit et. al. Biophys.<br />
J. 89 3721-3740 (2005)<br />
Amber (parm94 force field)<br />
Two bead model:<br />
Phosphate bead (P), Base<br />
bead (B)<br />
Intra-strand bonded and<br />
Inter-strand nonbonded<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
Force constants extracted<br />
from full-atomistic MD<br />
simulations via Boltzmann<br />
Inversion<br />
Generic base model: no<br />
A, T, G, C specificity<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
<strong>Model</strong> Interactions<br />
Four different bonds<br />
Two dihedrals<br />
Two <strong>in</strong>terstrand<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
Harmonic potentials are<br />
fitted to the Boltzmann<br />
<strong>in</strong>verted potentials.<br />
Generic base model: no<br />
A, T, G, C specificity<br />
Electrostatic <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
are not explicitly <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Intra-strand <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
Slight departure from harmonic behaviour<br />
Good agreement between the fitted functions and observed PMF<br />
from coarse-gra<strong>in</strong>ed simulations<br />
Equilibrium Distributions<br />
No significant coupl<strong>in</strong>g among CG <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Equilibrium Distributions<br />
Inter-strand <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
Non-harmonic behaviour is observed.<br />
H-bonds with<strong>in</strong> basepairs lead to stiff potentials<br />
Inter PP <strong>in</strong>teraction displays GC – AT basepair specificity<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
5’<br />
3’<br />
Directionality<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Equilibrium Structure<br />
M<strong>in</strong>or and Major grove<br />
Double helical structure<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Persistence Length<br />
Correlations of the PP bond<br />
vectors follow the helical pitch of<br />
the <strong>DNA</strong><br />
11.08bp pitch at f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />
temperature<br />
96 bps persistence length (l p )<br />
Persistence length is shorter<br />
than experimental value (~150<br />
bps)<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
L/l p =1.2<br />
L/l p =2.9<br />
L/l p =5.8<br />
σ= Lk−Lk o <br />
Lk o<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Supercoil Formation<br />
σ =0.00 σ =0.05 σ =0.13<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
Lk = Wr + Tw<br />
<strong>DNA</strong> m<strong>in</strong>i-circles (L/l p =1.2) exhibit a<br />
non-l<strong>in</strong>ear behaviour<br />
For small σ Tw absorbs all<br />
deformation, the m<strong>in</strong>icircle rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />
planar.<br />
Buckl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stability of the planar<br />
state is observed.<br />
Beyond the transition Tw and Wr<br />
absorb the excess l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g number<br />
equally<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
σ= Lk−Lk o <br />
Lk o<br />
Supercoil Formation<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Supercoil Formation<br />
For longer cha<strong>in</strong>s the planar regime slowly disappears.<br />
The buckl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stability is only observed <strong>in</strong> short cha<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Majority of the excess l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g number is absorbed by the Wr.<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
The coarse-gra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>DNA</strong> model mimics local geometric properties successfully.<br />
This model enables us to reach the relevant length scale for supercoil formation.<br />
Buckl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stability is observed for short cha<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Once planarity of the m<strong>in</strong>icircles is lost, for short cha<strong>in</strong>s the excess l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g number is<br />
absorbed equally by twist and writhe.<br />
For long cha<strong>in</strong>s the buckl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stability disappears, and the writhe absorbs majority of<br />
the excess l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g number<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Conclusions<br />
M. Sayar, B. Avsaroglu, A. Kabakcioglu, Phys. Rev. E 016001 (6) 2010<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Hydrophobically Modified PEs<br />
M. Bockstaller et al., Macromolecules, 34, 6353 (2001)<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
Hydrophobically Modified PEs<br />
• Rich phase diagram<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
M. Bockstaller et al., Macromolecules, 34 (2001), 6353<br />
• Micellar PPP aggregates <strong>in</strong> solution<br />
• 10-19 PPP molecules/cross-section (Na + counterion)<br />
• 60 PPP molecules/cross-section (Ca +2 counterion)<br />
• 4-5 PPP molecules <strong>in</strong> length<br />
• Double micelle length with double PPP length<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Preform the Bundle<br />
top view side view<br />
No self-assembly<br />
1000 water / PPP<br />
Gromos 96 Force Field<br />
SPC water model<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Simulation Results<br />
Monovalent counterions<br />
Sodium, Na<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
8 PPP Molecules<br />
• Basic pack<strong>in</strong>g idea is OK.<br />
• Hydrophobic side cha<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the<br />
core.<br />
• Charged SO 3 groups rema<strong>in</strong> on<br />
the surface.<br />
• Condensed counterions<br />
• Small fraction <strong>in</strong> the hydrophobic<br />
core<br />
• Counterions move with their<br />
hydration shell<br />
• Water <strong>in</strong>side the core<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Bundle Stability<br />
8 PPP Molecules 10 PPP Molecules 14 PPP Molecules<br />
20 PPP Molecules<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
Bundle Size from Simulations<br />
Comparison of Experimental and Simulated SAXS Results<br />
Bundles of 8-10 PPPs yield the closest match to the experimental SAXS results.<br />
B. Hess, M. Sayar, and C. Holm., Macromolecules 1703 (40), 2007<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Multivalent Counterions<br />
Divalent counterions<br />
Calcium, Ca<br />
Experimentallly bundles of size<br />
60 PPPs is observed with Ca +2<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Bundle Stability with Ca +2<br />
8 PPP molecules 10 PPP<br />
molecules<br />
20 PPP<br />
molecules<br />
Stable bundle<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
• 10-14 molecules /bundle<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Summary<br />
• Counterions penetrate the hydrophobic core for big bundles<br />
• Beyond 20 molecules the bundle forms two separate cores.<br />
• Pack<strong>in</strong>g of the side cha<strong>in</strong><br />
• Coulomb energy of the bundle<br />
• Hydrophobic energy of the side cha<strong>in</strong>s<br />
• No fundamental difference <strong>in</strong> bundle size with Na vs. Ca ions<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Bundle Size<br />
B. Hess, M. Sayar, and C. Holm., Macromolecules . 1703 (40), 2007<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
Na<br />
+<br />
Ca +<br />
2<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Comparison of Na + and Ca +2<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
<strong>Coarse</strong>-<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong>ed</strong> <strong>Model</strong> of PPP<br />
Bead spr<strong>in</strong>g model<br />
PPP backbone mapped on three<br />
beads (blue)<br />
PPP backbone is semi flexible<br />
Hydrophobic side cha<strong>in</strong> mapped<br />
on to a flexible cha<strong>in</strong> (green)<br />
Na + Ions (yellow)<br />
Preformed bundle of PPPs <strong>in</strong> Cell<br />
<strong>Model</strong><br />
H. J. Limbach, M. Sayar, and C. Holm., J. Phys.:<br />
Condens. Matter. 16, 2135 (2004)<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
Simulation <strong>Model</strong><br />
Molecular dynamics<br />
Langev<strong>in</strong> Thermostat<br />
Cell <strong>Model</strong><br />
Full electrostatics (N<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar<br />
2-loop) with explicit counterions<br />
Espresso Package
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Bundle Simulation<br />
H. J. Limbach, M. Sayar, and C. Holm., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 16, 2135 (2004)<br />
counterions both <strong>in</strong> and around the bundle<br />
only a fraction of counterions condense<br />
net charge on the micelle<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Phase Diagram<br />
non-monotonic dependence on<br />
l B and ε<br />
stable f<strong>in</strong>ite size bundles<br />
decreased stability with<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g l B , upto l B ≈2.0σ.<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g l B <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
attractive ion correlations<br />
leads to <strong>in</strong>creased stability<br />
H. J. Limbach, M. Sayar, and C. Holm., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 16, 2135 (2004)<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
<strong>Coarse</strong>-Gra<strong>in</strong> <strong>Model</strong><strong>in</strong>g of Phase Separat<strong>in</strong>g Systems<br />
Can we use iterative Boltzmann <strong>in</strong>version <strong>in</strong> the presence of an <strong>in</strong>terface?<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Cahit Dalgıçdir<br />
V i+1 r =V i r −k BT ln gi r <br />
g r <br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
LENNARD-JONES MODEL SYSTEM<br />
System composed of two types of particles (A and B)<br />
Same type of particles attract each other (i.e A-A and B-B)<br />
A-B <strong>in</strong>teraction is repulsive Lennard-Jones<br />
Iterative Boltzmann Inversion is applied to obta<strong>in</strong> all potentials<br />
simultaneously <strong>in</strong> the presence of the <strong>in</strong>terface.<br />
The radial distribution functions do not<br />
converge to 1 (i.e. bulk density) <strong>in</strong> the<br />
presence of an <strong>in</strong>terface.<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
Lennard-Jones <strong>Model</strong> System Results<br />
IBI successfully reproduces the actual RDFs and potentials<br />
RDF for attractive particles RDF for repulsive particles<br />
Attractive potential Repulsive potential<br />
Insufficient statistics for the A-B <strong>in</strong>teraction destabilizes the convergence of IBI.<br />
This can be overcome by a scal<strong>in</strong>g factor for the A-B <strong>in</strong>teraction.<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Hydrophobically Modified PEs<br />
M. Bockstaller et al., Macromolecules, 34, 6353 (2001)<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Application to a Real System: Propane & Water<br />
Propane-water system also phase separates<br />
Map each propane and water molecule onto a s<strong>in</strong>gle bead<br />
Target radial distribution functions are acquired from atomistic simulations.<br />
Iterative Boltzmann <strong>in</strong>version simulations are performed for propane and solvent<br />
separately to obta<strong>in</strong> propane-propane and solvent-solvent <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />
Atomistic snapshot<br />
<strong>Coarse</strong>-gra<strong>in</strong>ed snapshot<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
RDF for propane-propane<br />
Potential for propane-propane<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
RDF for solvent-solvent<br />
Potential for solvent-solvent<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
Propane-solvent <strong>in</strong>teraction is also obta<strong>in</strong>ed by IBI.<br />
The propane-propane and solvent-solvent <strong>in</strong>teractions are kept<br />
fixed as obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the IBI simulations of homogeneous<br />
systems<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
RDF for propane-solvent<br />
Potential for propane-solvent <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar
Max-Planck Society Partner Group Program with Theory group of Prof. Kurt Kremer at MPIP<br />
TUBITAK Project No: 108T553<br />
High-Performance Comput<strong>in</strong>g Lab at Koç University<br />
msayar@ku.edu.tr<br />
Thanks to:<br />
Baris Avsaroglu<br />
Alkan Kabakcioglu<br />
Berk Hess<br />
Christian Holm<br />
Hans Jorg Limbach<br />
Cahit Dalgıçdir<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
http://home.ku.edu.tr/~msayar