ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter
unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction or deflection of same.
Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns
by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or
focusing device‖.
It should be pointed out that the device invented by Eastlund would be ideally employed
where there were large sources of natural gas and that it had to be erected in the most
northern latitudes possible, to take advantage of the location where the earth‘s naturally
occurring lines of force intersect the planet. In the patents, he recommended the North Slope
of Alaska, where the largest reserves of natural gas in the United States are found and where
these lines intersect the planet.
Moreover, Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) was the parent company of APTI, the
assigned owner of the Eastlund patents, and the owner of trillions of cubic feet of natural gas
on the North Slope. 179 APTI became the initial HAARP contractor.
In 1987 Dr. Edward Teller described a new component of Star Wars technology, a laser
like weapon for the North Slope of Alaska. Could HAARP be part of the Star Wars weapons
system being promoted in 1987 by Dr. Teller?
We believe that this is the case, and that what HAARP represents is a first stage ―proof-of
concept‖ undertaking which, if proven valid, will expand to a full-blown military program.
The idea of a ground-based versus a satellite-based defense shield is an important
consideration in that satellites arc significantly more vulnerable and costly to repair once
launched into orbit. Moreover, to stop a United States ground based system would require a
terrorist attack or invasion. That would be an overt act of war on the part of an adversary. If
deployed from ground based locations in the United States, or within the territorial
boundaries of our allies, the shield has distinct military advantages.
While the currently constructed and planned future expansion of HAARP may not be
large enough to create all of the Eastlund effects, it is of sufficient size to test many of the
ideas in the patents.
Military spokesmen deny that they are using any of the Eastlund ideas; however, careful
review of the materials lead to the inescapable conclusion that the military is misleading the
public again. Moreover, it was reported by Dr. Eastlund in a National Public Radio broadcast
in 1988181 that the military had tested some of the ideas in the patents before removing the
secrecy orders. In a more recent interview, this fact was again confirmed by Dr. Eastlund.
A review of the other nine patents originally held by APTI, when overlain on the military
planning documents, leaves researchers with an understanding of this new weapon system
experiment - clearly countering the military‘s public pronouncements.
Going back to 1984, the United States Air Force‘s Major Norman H. Ruotanen, wrote a
paper which became a chapter in a most interesting publication. ―Nuclear and
Electromagnetic Warfare in Low-Intensity Conflict‖. The chapter considered the use of
nuclear weapons for creating electromagnetic pulses (EMP) in order to disable electronic
systems of adversaries.
The Major went on to discuss a less intrusive method and perhaps a method which could
be better controlled.
He describes the system:
―Nuclear EMP devices are not the only way to create damaging electromagnetic pulses.
Electrical power supply, power conditioning, and microwave source device technologies have
advanced to the point where one could feasibly generate electromagnetic pulses in the radio