09.03.2013 Views

ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Resonance - a phenomenon related to the natural frequency of each part of a system -<br />

figures strongly <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tesla</strong> technology as well as <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions between electromagnetism and<br />

mental processes or liv<strong>in</strong>g cells which Dr. Nick Begich researched.<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g global systems, <strong>in</strong>terconnectedness through resonance is undeniable, Trombly<br />

said: ―We have observed that, when a system is near saturation you don't know what is go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to send it over the l<strong>in</strong>e‖.<br />

LARGE-SCALE ELECTROMAGNETICS<br />

The <strong>in</strong>terconnectedness between the ionosphere and the lithosphere (earth‘s crust) or the<br />

ionosphere and the <strong>in</strong>ner core of the earth, is partly an <strong>in</strong>ductive relationship, he said. What<br />

does Trombly mean, us<strong>in</strong>g an electrical term such as <strong>in</strong>ductive <strong>in</strong> relation to layers of the<br />

earth? He admits that some ―people who call themselves geophysicists would scratch their<br />

heads; they wouldn‘t know what I was talk<strong>in</strong>g about. But there plenty of other ones who are<br />

good enough with electromagnetic systems on a grand scale, who would at least stop and<br />

pause before they would do anyth<strong>in</strong>g as stupid as send multi-gigawatt pulses <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

ionosphere‖.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce earthquakes are known to cause the ionosphere to react electromagnetically,<br />

Mann<strong>in</strong>g asked if the reverse could happen - could pulsed disturbances <strong>in</strong> the ionosphere set<br />

off earthquakes?<br />

He replied that he would not be so naive as just to say, ―yes, if they stimulate the<br />

ionosphere <strong>in</strong> this way then they‘re go<strong>in</strong>g to set off earthquakes. However, I would not be so<br />

cavalier as to say that if they happen to stimulate the ionosphere at a moment when it is<br />

already saturated, or near saturation, that they couldn‘t set off an event that could <strong>in</strong>duce<br />

chaos - where you could end up hav<strong>in</strong>g a k<strong>in</strong>d of magnetic storm<strong>in</strong>g, almost a runaway event<br />

up there‖.<br />

In documents the <strong>HAARP</strong> planners put together <strong>in</strong> 1990 they say that they were<br />

<strong>in</strong>tentionally try<strong>in</strong>g to get a runaway effect <strong>in</strong> the ionosphere. This effect was new and would<br />

represent an energy threshold not yet reached with these k<strong>in</strong>ds of military tools. The<br />

document said, ―...that at the highest HF (high frequency) powers available <strong>in</strong> the West, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>stabilities commonly studied are approach<strong>in</strong>g (heir maximum RF (radio frequency) energy<br />

dissipative capability, beyond which the plasma processes will 'runaway' until the next<br />

limit<strong>in</strong>g factor is reached‖.<br />

What will happen when this runaway event occurs?<br />

Trombly po<strong>in</strong>ted out a similarity between the decision to pulse several gigawatts <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

ionosphere (<strong>HAARP</strong>) without know<strong>in</strong>g what will happen, and the first atomic weapon<br />

test<strong>in</strong>g. Years after that test, physicist Robert Oppenheimer admitted that the scientists had<br />

not known what would happen when they set off the bomb - if the cha<strong>in</strong> reaction was go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to stop or keep on go<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

―The government knew that the scientists didn‘t know!‖<br />

More recently, spectrum analysis work, especially <strong>in</strong> the ultra low frequency (ULF) part<br />

of the electromagnetic spectrum, has clearly shown how non-l<strong>in</strong>ear the effects from<br />

underground nuclear test<strong>in</strong>g were, Trombly said. (Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear means hav<strong>in</strong>g an output that is<br />

not directly proportional to the <strong>in</strong>put. In other words, unexpected or unpredictable.)<br />

Scientists were completely surprised by these results they represented many many times<br />

the expected effect.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!