ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

Chapter Nine
TESLA'S WEATHER APPRENTICES
Archimedes (287-212 B.C.) started a Long tradition of ambitious engineers who want to
make their mark on the world. ―Give me a long enough lever and a place to stand on and I
will move the Earth‖, Archimedes said. Fortunately, he never found that big a tool. More
than twenty centuries later, his spirit lives on in the military‘s engineers. They would like to
at least be able to move the upper-atmosphere jet stream, changing global weather to one
country‘s advantage.
Is electromagnetism that tool?
Two scientists from the Stanford University Radioscience Laboratory, H.C. Chang and
U.S. Iman, are among the experts who offer evidence of what our technology can do to affect
the sky by making waves on earth. They have published papers about electron precipitation
from the magnetosphere (the outer belts of charged particles which stream toward Earth‘s
magnetic poles) caused by man-made very low frequency electromagnetic waves. ―These
precipitated particles can produce secondary ionization, emit X-rays, and cause significant
perturbation in the lower ionosphere‖.
In 1974 Dr. Robert Helliwell and John Katsufrakis of Stanford University‘s radio science
laboratory showed that very low frequency radio waves can vibrate the magnetosphere. In
the Antarctic, with a 20km antenna and five kiloHertz transmitter, they learned that the
magnetosphere can be modulated to cause high energy particles to cascade into Earth‘s
atmosphere. By turning the signal on or off, they could stop the flow of energetic particles.
WEATHER CONTROL
Avalanches of energy dislodged by such radio waves could hit us hard.
―The theoretical implication suggested by their work is that global weather control can be
attained by the injection of relatively small 'signals' into the Van Allen belts (radiation belts
around Earth) - something like a super-transistor effect‖, said Frederic Jueneman.
The columnist for Industrial Research magazine speculated further, ―If Tesla's
resonance effects, as shown by the Stanford team, can control energies by minuscule
triggering signals, then by an extension of this principle we should be able to affect the field
environment of the very stars in the sky... With godlike arrogance, we someday may yet
direct the stars in their courses‖.
The question is will that knowledge be used by war-oriented or biosphere-oriented
scientists?
A 1977 editorial in Saturday Review warned about weather warfare and called it a moral
issue, saying, ―If the world is in for a long spell of crippling weather, then we are fools and
monsters if we don‘t get together for the purpose of mounting a response as though our life
depended on it - as indeed it does‖.
A series of weather disasters began in 1960, according to a CIA report mentioned in the
editorial, but at the time climatologists couldn‘t look ahead and see that droughts, floods and
abnormal temperatures would continue beyond that decade. As if natural disasters weren‘t
bad enough, the CIA reported that national governments were already able to manipulate
weather for military purposes.
The editorialist had an impertinent thought: ―It is difficult to read the CIA report without
wondering whether some of the climatic aberrations in recent years may not have been part
of military experimental programs‖.
Saturday Review‘s 1977 editorial used strong words to describe the desensitization of the
public and decision makers - a deadening of moral indignation that came from seeing an
endless procession of super-weapons.