ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

In another section The Revolution in Military Affairs discusses the reality of the RMA:
―Even with all the constraints and countermeasures, there is some value in applying
emerging technology using existing strategy, doctrine, organization, force structure,
objectives, concepts, attitudes and norms. But there is another alternative: we could
deliberately engineer a comprehensive revolution, seeking utter transformation rather than
simply an expeditious use of new technology. However alluring, such a program is rife with
hidden dangers and unintended consequences. Unlike the Manhattan Project, we are not
forced to pursue revolution without considering the implications. In conflict short of war,
RMA is a Pandora's box desperately in need of careful scrutiny before opening‖.
The National Review article quoted earlier in this chapter says that this box has already
been opened and that the concept of an RMA is already occupying the best minds in the
Pentagon. (The Revolution in Military Affairs, has been reprinted and is available - see
Resource Guide at the end of this book for ordering information.)
The Cold War is not over, but has changed. We know that there are concerns which,
being a free people, we must address and bring to the attention of others. We believe that the
greatest threat to freedom is an over-oppressive and increasingly secretive government. To
many, the government has shifted from one, ―of the people, by the people and for the people‖
to a government ―of special interests, for their own benefit, at the people's expense‖.
What went wrong, and where it went wrong, to a large extent, is a product of the
intelligence bureaucracies which thrive through one administration to the next with
unrestrained growth. These secretive bureaucracies hide more and more of their secrets
under a cloak of national security, while drifting further from the principles which have
allowed the United States to exist for over two hundred years. Secret government policy is
not sanctioned by the free will of the population, and threatens the core beliefs of liberty,
honest government and public responsibility.
The only truly free people are those who live in an open society, a society which cherishes
above all the right of men and women to control and set the values that their government
should reflect. These are the popularly set values which must be pressed into the philosophy
of all projects, policies and programs our governments seek to project into reality.
No program should be permitted to grow out of democratic governments which does not
reflect the values and will of those governed. There have been too many Watergates,
Irangates, and political wars which have only served politicians and protected corporate
America. Our military and economic policies are increasingly empty of the values upon which
our democratic forms of government rest.
When we look at HAARP documents, we see that the military, the contractors and the
University of Alaska all appear to have deliberately misled the public and elected officials.
In other projects - tike proposed nuclear excavation discussed earlier - it was the
biologists at the University who objected. In the HAARP project, the environmental,
biological and life sciences are again not explored enough. Given its potential impacts, the
project should be subjected to continuous rigorous independent review by specialists in the
life sciences and atmospheric science.
Those deriving their incomes and future positions from HAARP-type projects should not
be called upon to be the guardians of the interests of the rest of the world. It is impossible for
these geophysicists to have had all of the training required to assess all of the risks. This is
not to say that Institute scientists are reckless in their approach, but are they fully aware of
the potential environmental and health risks?
Is HAARP the beginning of the "Brave New World"?
It is time to think about a change in the way we allow our government to evolve - into
oppressor rather than servant. Our system of democracy was set up to serve and enhance life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Are these dead concepts?