ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

capability to defend against hostile actions, and to collect intelligence data prior to conflict
onset‖.
What this seemed to say was that the objective of the research would be toward mind
manipulation at a distance, where the military could alter what people thought and, at the
same time, know what they thought. It seemed too much like a science fiction novel.
How in the world could this effect be possible?
How long had research been underway, so that the military would be so bold as to
publish this kind of material in an unclassified document?
Could it be that they had quietly advanced their research into these technologies
under a veil of secrecy?
Then again, the Neurophone technology had been around since the 1960's. It had been
thoroughly investigated and most likely used in forming the basis for new weapons. After all,
the military had confiscated and controlled the technology under a secrecy order decades
before (see Chapter Twenty-two)
The report went on to describe a system which again pointed to the HAARP project. The
report called for the development of: ―A rapidly scanning RFR system [which] could provide
an effective stun or kill capability over a large area. System effectiveness will be a function of
waveform, field intensity, pulse widths, repetition frequency and carrier frequency. The
system can be developed using tissue and whole animal experimental studies, coupled with
mechanisms and waveform effects research‖.
This is what HAARP is, among other things. Page V of the HAARP HF Active Auroral
Research Program. Joint Program Plans and Activities specifies that the RFR heater must
have a rapid scanning capability. Other HAARP documents define the waveform and
frequency characteristics as if the same writer had written all of the documents. It is the new
tool for the military in meeting their self imposed challenge of a "technological race." HAARP
is the one-size-fits-all RFR universal tool.
The grossly unfortunate part of this type of experimentation is how it is used. In our
opinion, using RFR and other energies to destroy human life, as opposed to enhancing it, is
immoral. The new directions of the energy sciences in healing people and enhancing health
are not considered by the military - a travesty and a disservice to us all.
At a time when health care costs are rising, and the threats of major conflict declining,
our government continues to spend billions on killing rather than on enhancing the human
experience. These areas are important, and the research should be available so that more
prudent uses can be developed. If this happened, we believe it would speed the positive
developments being pursued by those who have great energy and creativity; but limited
resources.
Unfortunately, the idea of using RFR for destructive purposes negates the entire area of
positive life science applications. The research in life sciences using electromagnetic
radiations (EMR) is advancing outside of the mainstream medical establishment, but is
beginning to be used there as well. Some genetic engineering researchers for example, are
already using this knowledge in their work.
Going back to the text by Captain Paul Tyler, we can look at the debate between classical
theories and recent research. There is a gulf of conflict between these two schools of thought.
The debate centers on the classical idea that only ionizing radiation (that which generates
heat in tissue) can cause reactions in the body, while new research indicates that subtle,
small, amounts of energy can cause reactions as well. What Tyler wrote in 1984, as an officer
in the Air Force, puts the debate simply.
He said, ―Even though the body is basically an electrochemical system, modem science
has almost exclusively studied the chemical aspects of the body and to date has largely
neglected the electrical aspects. However, over the past decade researchers have devised
many mathematical models to approximate the internal fields in animals and humans. Some