ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

easthousecentre
from easthousecentre More from this publisher
09.03.2013 Views

Force showed, by this publication, that they are well aware of the potential use of a transmitting system like HAARP. More importantly politically is the "Newt Gingrich spin" placed on the development efforts in the foreword, by today's Speaker of the House, to the military's report on this subject. The foreword to Low-intensity Conflict and Modern Technology was written by Congressman Newt Gingrich in 1986 before he rose to the position of Speaker. This position makes him currently the third most powerful person in the United States government. Gingrich's views on "low intensity conflicts" become relevant when considered along with the development of non-lethal technology. He focuses on creating approaches to conflict which can dispense with radicals who, in his words, ―engage quietly in dirty little wars in faraway places with almost no regard for legal nicety or the technical problems of international law‖. The ability of the United States to meet these challenges is also discussed in the foreword as Gingrich wrote: ―The organization of power in the State and Defense Departments and the relationships between Congress, the news media, and the executive branch are all unsuited to fighting low-intensity conflict effectively‖. He goes on to describe the limits of the military in addressing these types of conflicts, and commends the military for developing the policy doctrine and the new technology directions of the Air Force put forward in the book. Newt Gingrich apparently remains a fan of nonlethal weapons, which he views as useful technology for domestic law enforcement. Specifically, he said, when commenting on these technologies, that they ―are our real peace dividend‖ and that they will, ―preserve the defense industrial base, stimulate jobs in high-technology industry, and provide needed new options to local police and law enforcement authorities‖. Another interesting issue to contemplate is the Defense Department's new Policy on nonlethal weapon systems, where ―adversaries‖ and ―enemies have been more broadly defined, as here the use of such systems against American citizens. The idea that these systems can be used almost without detection to manipulate the behavior and thinking of people raises moral questions. This use also appears to be in conflict with Constitutional rights regarding free expression and speech. The fact that the military together with the United States Justice Department can now use these technologies, under their broad definitions, should sound an alarm for all people, not just Americans. In our opinion, the only redeeming discussion in Low-Intensity Conflict, and Modern Technology, (a compilation of papers presented in 1984) was that some at the meeting saw the new technologies for what they were, and began heated debates about the morality of using these weapon systems. In the closing page of the technology overview the following was written: ―Paul Tyler also discusses the application of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) to lowintensity conflict. He surveys ongoing scientific research into the biological effects of electromagnetic radiation. Tyler tells us current evidence indicates that specific biological effects can be achieved by controlling the perimeters of electromagnetic radiation directed at human subjects. Thus there is the potential to use EMR to control human behavior or even to maim or kill adversaries. Tyler urges that the United States should devote considerable resources to exploring the possibilities of developing EMR weapons technology, which could be of particular value in low-intensity scenarios‖. It becomes increasingly obvious that the inner circle of the Department of Defense placed a substantial amount of effort and emphasis in these areas. The writer continued: ―Both Tyler's and Ruotanen's (another contributor to Low- Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology) papers created heated discussions. Some panel members questioned the advisability of employing nuclear, EMP (electromagnetic pulse), and EMR (electromagnetic radiation) weapons. They felt the ever-present danger of

escalation would negate any advantage to be gained from surgical ground or atmospheric nuclear burst. Some on the panel saw Tyler's article as bordering on moral heresy. It is acceptable to have weapons and strategies to blow bodies into little pieces or burn them to a crisp, but not to use medical research and techniques to develop more subtle ways of eliminating or controlling enemies. There was some feeling that any benefit to be gained from research into EMR effects - dangerous in itself - might well be overshadowed by indignant outcries against the use of EMR weapons on human beings‖. The development of these new weapons helps demonstrate the general immorality of war, particularly when the military establishment presents mind manipulation as a preferable outcome to death. The authors of Angels Don't Play This HAARP believe that we need open debate on these types of weapons. These discussions should be similar to nuclear arms talks. Another revealing section of this military compiled book apparently aimed at a rationale which would make sense in the minds of defense planners and would help them deal with the moral issues: ―The articles and discussions in the technology panels generated quite a bit of heat and quite a bit of light. Chief among the concepts brought into the light was that the application of technology to low-intensity conflict should not hinge on the debate over simple or advanced systems, or high versus low technologies...The key is to recognize specific requirements and apply suitable systems and technologies to meet those requirements‖. Stated differently, the military's means justifies the military's end. (For Ruotanen's comments on electromagnetic pulses see our chapter, Thermonuclear Weapons Replaced By Electropulse.) Obviously, these concepts were well understood by the military in 1984 when the original work was presented which led to this book's publication in 1986. The system's development moved forward-most likely within "black budgets" from 1984 onward. The HAARP system is the largest concept-delivery system ever constructed by the military which could create the effects described in 1984. The next chapter in Low-Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology is the section written by Captain Paul Tyler. Tyler discusses, to some degree, the application of nonionizing radiation using external fields including radiofrequency radiation and other electromagnetic radiations. He discusses some of the beneficial effects of this energy for healing wounds, bone regeneration in fractures, electro-anesthesia, acupuncture and pain relief. He then jumps into the military applications of this technology: ―The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are wide-ranging and can be used in many military or quasi-military situations... Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling breaches of security at military installations, and antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability of individuals to function could be degraded to such a point that they would be combat ineffective. Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areas with a single system. They are silent and countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop... One last area where electromagnetic radiation may prove of some value is in enhancing abilities of individuals for anomalous phenomena‖. Tyler‘s comments point to applications which may already be somewhat developed. He refers to an earlier Air Force document about the uses of radio frequency radiation in combat situations, (note that HAARP is the most versatile and the largest radio frequency radiation transmitter in the world.) He also points out that the uses may include enhancement of anomalous phenomena in individuals. Anomalous phenomena are those kinds of things which are not readily explained. You might say these are the quirks in human potentials. These could be called extrasensory or supernormal phenomena. This significant area is

escalation would negate any advantage to be ga<strong>in</strong>ed from surgical ground or atmospheric<br />

nuclear burst. Some on the panel saw Tyler's article as border<strong>in</strong>g on moral heresy.<br />

It is acceptable to have weapons and strategies to blow bodies <strong>in</strong>to little pieces or burn<br />

them to a crisp, but not to use medical research and techniques to develop more subtle ways<br />

of elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g or controll<strong>in</strong>g enemies. There was some feel<strong>in</strong>g that any benefit to be ga<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

from research <strong>in</strong>to EMR effects - dangerous <strong>in</strong> itself - might well be overshadowed by<br />

<strong>in</strong>dignant outcries aga<strong>in</strong>st the use of EMR weapons on human be<strong>in</strong>gs‖.<br />

The development of these new weapons helps demonstrate the general immorality of<br />

war, particularly when the military establishment presents m<strong>in</strong>d manipulation as a<br />

preferable outcome to death. The authors of Angels Don't Play This <strong>HAARP</strong> believe that we<br />

need open debate on these types of weapons. These discussions should be similar to nuclear<br />

arms talks.<br />

Another reveal<strong>in</strong>g section of this military compiled book apparently aimed at a rationale<br />

which would make sense <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>ds of defense planners and would help them deal with the<br />

moral issues: ―The articles and discussions <strong>in</strong> the technology panels generated quite a bit of<br />

heat and quite a bit of light. Chief among the concepts brought <strong>in</strong>to the light was that the<br />

application of technology to low-<strong>in</strong>tensity conflict should not h<strong>in</strong>ge on the debate over simple<br />

or advanced systems, or high versus low technologies...The key is to recognize specific<br />

requirements and apply suitable systems and technologies to meet those requirements‖.<br />

Stated differently, the military's means justifies the military's end. (For Ruotanen's<br />

comments on electromagnetic pulses see our chapter, Thermonuclear Weapons Replaced By<br />

Electropulse.)<br />

Obviously, these concepts were well understood by the military <strong>in</strong> 1984 when the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

work was presented which led to this book's publication <strong>in</strong> 1986. The system's development<br />

moved forward-most likely with<strong>in</strong> "black budgets" from 1984 onward. The <strong>HAARP</strong> system is<br />

the largest concept-delivery system ever constructed by the military which could create the<br />

effects described <strong>in</strong> 1984.<br />

The next chapter <strong>in</strong> Low-Intensity Conflict and Modern <strong>Technology</strong> is the section<br />

written by Capta<strong>in</strong> Paul Tyler. Tyler discusses, to some degree, the application of nonioniz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

radiation us<strong>in</strong>g external fields <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g radiofrequency radiation and other<br />

electromagnetic radiations. He discusses some of the beneficial effects of this energy for<br />

heal<strong>in</strong>g wounds, bone regeneration <strong>in</strong> fractures, electro-anesthesia, acupuncture and pa<strong>in</strong><br />

relief.<br />

He then jumps <strong>in</strong>to the military applications of this technology:<br />

―The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are wide-rang<strong>in</strong>g and can<br />

be used <strong>in</strong> many military or quasi-military situations... Some of these potential uses <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

deal<strong>in</strong>g with terrorist groups, crowd control, controll<strong>in</strong>g breaches of security at military<br />

<strong>in</strong>stallations, and antipersonnel techniques <strong>in</strong> tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM<br />

systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual<br />

distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability of <strong>in</strong>dividuals to function could be<br />

degraded to such a po<strong>in</strong>t that they would be combat <strong>in</strong>effective. Another advantage of<br />

electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areas with a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

system. They are silent and countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop... One last<br />

area where electromagnetic radiation may prove of some value is <strong>in</strong> enhanc<strong>in</strong>g abilities of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals for anomalous phenomena‖.<br />

Tyler‘s comments po<strong>in</strong>t to applications which may already be somewhat developed. He<br />

refers to an earlier Air Force document about the uses of radio frequency radiation <strong>in</strong> combat<br />

situations, (note that <strong>HAARP</strong> is the most versatile and the largest radio frequency radiation<br />

transmitter <strong>in</strong> the world.) He also po<strong>in</strong>ts out that the uses may <strong>in</strong>clude enhancement of<br />

anomalous phenomena <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals. Anomalous phenomena are those k<strong>in</strong>ds of th<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

which are not readily expla<strong>in</strong>ed. You might say these are the quirks <strong>in</strong> human potentials.<br />

These could be called extrasensory or supernormal phenomena. This significant area is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!