ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

The development of these technologies is being jointly managed by the Non-Lethal
Weapons Steering Committee, which is co-chaired by the Undersecretary of Defense for
Acquisition and Technology and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special
Operations and Low Intensity Conflict. This crystallizes the new Justice Department and
Department of Defense alliance for future law enforcement and military initiatives, in the
United States.
The weaving together of Department of Defense missions with civilian Department of
Justice missions is unprecedented. Not since the Civil War has the military machinery -
except in very limited riot control actions - been turned against United States citizens. The
idea of using these dangerous and intrusive systems is counter to good public policy.
This raises serious questions regarding use of our Department of Defense for domestic
police actions, which may be a violation of constitutional law by being in conflict with the
narrowly-defined federal use of the military for the national defense.
International Alarm Bells Begin to Sound
Questions are not just being raised by the authors of this book, they are being raised by
the International Committee of the Red Cross. In their report from mid-1994, a number of
points were raised.
The idea of war without death was not new but began in the 1950's, according to the
report. The military interest in these systems dealt with chemical weapons, later advancing to
radiation weapons. The report looked at the ramifications of international law regarding use
of these new technologies.
It pointed out weaknesses in the international conventions regarding the use of chemical
weapons: ―Therefore, when the Convention (Chemical Weapons Convention) comes into
force next year, activities involving them - activities such as development, production,
stockpiling and use - will become illegal, unless their purpose is a purpose that is expressly
not prohibited under the Convention‖.
One such purpose is law enforcement including domestic riot control purposes.
Unfortunately, the Convention does not define what it means by law enforcement' (whose
law? what law? enforcement where? by whom?), though it does define what it means by 'riot
control agent', namely 'any chemical...which can produce rapidly in humans sensory
irritation or disabling physical effects which disappear within a short time following
termination of exposure'.
States parties are enjoined ―not to use riot control agents as a method of warfare‖.
In other words, we can use on our own citizens what we cannot use in warfare with real
enemies who are threats to national security. This explains why the development of nonlethals
has moved out of the Department of Defense into the Department of Justice. For the
Department of Defense to continue to work on these weapons, as instruments of war, is now
illegal under international law. The Red Cross report went on to discuss the shift from
weapons of war to police tools which they called – ―riot control agents‖.
What does this mean for Americans?
This places Americans, and citizens of other counties, in a lesser protected class than
individuals seeking to destroy our counties - our real adversaries. This language really
represents a way for countries to continue to develop these weapons. This is a loop hole in
the agreement. So while the treaty looks good on the surface, it is hollow rhetoric
underneath.
In another section of the report, ―Future Weapons Using High Power Microwaves‖ are
discussed at length. This section describes microwave frequencies, for HAARP developed for
use in weapons against machines and people.