ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

Scientists from Russia are now collaborating with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
on these projects.
From National Defense to the Justice Department
On July 21, 1994, Dr. Christopher Lamb, Director of Policy Planning, issued a draft
Department of Defense directive which would establish a policy for non-lethal weapons. The
policy was intended to take effect January 1, 1995, and formally connected the military's nonlethal
research to civilian law enforcement agencies.
The governmentßs plan to vise pulsed electromagnetic and radio frequency systems as a
nonlethal technology for domestic Justice Department use rings the alarm for some
observers. Nevertheless, the plan for integrating these systems is moving forward. Coupling
these uses with expanded military missions is even more disturbing. This combined mission
raises additional constitutional questions for Americans regarding the power of the federal
government.
In interviews with members of the Defense Department the development of this policy
was confirmed. In those February 1995, discussions, it was discovered that these policies
were internal to agencies and were not subject to any public review process.
In its current draft form, the policy gives highest priority to development of those
technologies most likely to get dual use, i.e. law enforcement and military applications.
According to this document, non-lethal weapons are to be used on the government‘s
domestic ―adversaries‖.
The definition of adversary has been significantly enlarged in the policy: ―The term
adversary is used above in its broadest sense, including those who are not declared enemies
but who are engaged in activities we wish to stop. This policy does not preclude legally
authorized domestic use of the nonlethal weapons by United States military forces in support
of law enforcement‖.
This allows use of the military in actions against the citizens of the country that they are
supposed to protect. This policy statement begs the question; who are the enemies that are
engaged in activities they wish to stop, what are those activities, and who will make the
decisions to stop these activities?
An important aspect of non-lethal weapon systems is that the name nonlethal is
intentionally misleading. The Policy adds, ―It is important that the public understand that
just as lethal weapons do not achieve perfect lethality, neither will non-lethal weapons
always be capable of precluding fatalities and undesired collateral damage‖.
In other words, you might still destroy property and kill people with the use of these new
weapons.
Pentagon officials said they would like to get $41 million in 1995, for developing these
weapons which include their electromagnetic pulse systems. This meager sum has a good
deal of reach, because it is for implementing already understood technology, for building
prototype weapons out of mostly off the shelf parts. The only challenge would be putting
them together.
The basic research for these technologies was done with black budget money. (These are
funds which are so secret even the Congress does not know how the money will be spent,
behind which organizations like the CIA, government laboratories run by the military and
other intelligence organizations, hide their programs.)
The Pentagon actually received $50 million to be used jointly with the Department of
Justice in developing these non-lethal weapons.
In press statements, the government continues to downplay the risks associated with
such systems, even though the lethal potential is described in context of their own usage
policy. In Orwellian double speak, what is nonlethal can be lethal.