ANGELS DON‘T PLAY THIS HAARP Advances in Tesla Technology

military to come back with a more comprehensive plan before they could get any more
money.
The third piece of information in this part of the puzzle came out in a radio interview
conducted on December 23, 1994, by Linda Moulton Howe with the HAARP program
director, John Heckscher.
Heckscher expressed his frustration in not being able to move forward on the project
because of the Senate action. He made clear that HAARP could not continue unless the ―nonproliferation
people‖ put in the proper documents which would clarify earth-penetrating
tomography as a HAARP project mission. The non-proliferation people, referred to by
Heckscher, are those in the Pentagon and elsewhere who develop the plans for locating
underground military installations, especially nuclear research and development facilities.
Our research, and critiques by independent scientists, raised questions about whether or
not the earth-penetrating tomography application would work in a ―hot war‖ environment.
For it to work there need to be instruments on the ground, or traversing the ground at very,
very low altitudes. Our technical review indicated that it would be difficult to do this in
combat. But it could be used in other situations.
It could be used to verify nonproliferation agreements and other peace agreements where
the country to be probed allowed the U. S. military to install ground sensors.
Earth-penetrating tomography could also be used for minerals, and oil exploration, as
referred to in the Anchorage Daily News:
―UAF researchers have plans for HAARP‘s radio waves when they bounce back to the
Earth. They hope to harness the energy waves after they hit the ground with a small antenna
affixed to a helicopter. They might be able to use the radio waves to explore for mineral
deposits and even oil...‖
Searching for oil is one of the many HAARP experiments which is not part of the
estimated $175 million budget for the first two phases of the project. To find out more about
earth-penetration mapping the authors contacted HAARP program manager Heckscher in
late February, 1995.
He said it would use, ―in terms of frequency, like 10 or 20 Hertz (pulses per second) or
maybe one Hertz, one cycle per second type waves‖.
This range of frequencies is a very important point. These frequencies are the same
dominate frequencies within which the human brain normally operates!
This potential impact on people will be explored further in another chapter.
The idea of using HAARP for earth-penetrating tomography was anticipated from the
very beginning of HAARP. That this tool could be used to produce this ―by-product‖ was
always known but downplayed in the records. However, the usage must have been promoted
in selling the project to the United States Senate, The unexpected result was that the Senate
gave priority to this aspect.
The fact that the system will send a huge amount of energy into the ionosphere, and
return a large portion of that energy to the earth, with possible ionospheric amplifications or
induced charged particle rain, is alarming. Potential environmental implications have not
been fully disclosed and most likely are not well understood.
These uses were never discovered by those opposed to the HAARP project until late 1994,
and only confirmed by a review of the Congressional Record at that time. Formal objections
to the nondisclosure of the biological effects of ELF on living things in the earth-penetrating
tomography application of the technology were filed with various governmental agencies, but
to no avail.
We could not clearly find out the facts until late January 1995, much after the regulating
authorities had already granted the go-ahead for HAARP testing. The only remaining barrier
to HAARP raised by the United States Senate was the question of funding.