09.03.2013 Views

the trees of great britain & ireland - Facsimile Books & other digitally ...

the trees of great britain & ireland - Facsimile Books & other digitally ...

the trees of great britain & ireland - Facsimile Books & other digitally ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

42 The Trees <strong>of</strong> Great Britain and Ireland<br />

<strong>the</strong> tree fresh and green long after most <strong>trees</strong> have lost <strong>the</strong>ir foliage, The time <strong>of</strong><br />

flowering is also very late, and this is a point <strong>of</strong> interest, although <strong>the</strong> flowers are not<br />

conspicuous or remarkable for size or colour. It is a very hardy tree in England, 1<br />

and seems to be free from all attacks <strong>of</strong> fungi and insects. Its roots clo not sucker,<br />

which is a point in its favour when planted in towns or in gardens or parks. It<br />

has been freely used as a street tree in Italy, where its dense foliage is an<br />

advantage in <strong>the</strong> hot summers. It is remarkable how little <strong>the</strong> foliage is affected<br />

by <strong>the</strong> hottest and driest seasons, and on this account it might be tried in dry and<br />

hot situations. It thrives fairly well in all soils that are deep and not too compact,<br />

but it will only grow vigorously in deep rich soils, where seedlings will sometimes<br />

attain a height <strong>of</strong> 12 feet in four or five years. 2 It is propagated by seeds, which<br />

should be sown in spring.<br />

REMARKABLE TREES<br />

The <strong>trees</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Kew Gardens have been alluded to as regards <strong>the</strong>ir history.<br />

The one which occurs near <strong>the</strong> Pagoda, in 1903, was 68 feet high and 8 feet 3 inches<br />

in circumference. The old tree, with <strong>the</strong> branches held toge<strong>the</strong>r by chains, now<br />

measures (1905) 50 feet high and 13 feet in girth at a foot from <strong>the</strong> ground, <strong>the</strong><br />

narrowest part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> short bole, which branches immediately into three main limbs.<br />

A fourth limb, very large, was blown <strong>of</strong>f some years ago. Not far <strong>of</strong>f is a smaller<br />

tree about 6 feet in girth near <strong>the</strong> ground; it branches from <strong>the</strong> base, forming a<br />

wide-spreading low tree.<br />

At Syon, two <strong>trees</strong> <strong>of</strong> considerable size are now living, each about 70 feet high ;<br />

one measured in 1903 12^ feet in girth, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r 12 feet. 8<br />

The tree in <strong>the</strong> Oxford Botanic Garden was 65 feet high by 12 feet 3 inches in<br />

girth in 1903 when measured by Elwes. 4<br />

That in <strong>the</strong> old Botanic Garden at Cambridge is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> finest <strong>trees</strong> in<br />

England, as it has a very symmetrical bole. It measured in 1904, 73 feet high by<br />

ii feet in girth. It is figured in Plate i6. s<br />

We are not acquainted with any large specimens <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sophora now growing<br />

in Scotland, Ireland, or Wales, though Loudon mentions one at Tyninghame,<br />

Haddingtonshire, 42 feet high, 6 one at Castletown near Dublin 35 feet high, and<br />

one at Oriel Temple, Co. Louth, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same height.<br />

In France and Germany <strong>the</strong>re are probably larger specimens than in this<br />

country. (A. H.)<br />

1 The Sophora has withstood, without injury, <strong>the</strong> severest frosts in Perthshire. See pamphlet by Col. II. M. Drummond<br />

Hay, The Comparative Hardihood <strong>of</strong> Hard-wooded Plants, from Observations madeat Seggieden, Perthshire (1882).<br />

2 Nicholson, in an excellent article on <strong>the</strong> Sophoras in Woods and Forests, July 30, 1884.<br />

3 One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se is mentioned by Loudon, ii. 565, as being <strong>the</strong> largest near London, and measured in 1838 57 feet<br />

high and about 9 feet in girth.<br />

4 This is said by Loudon (I.e.) to have been twenty years planted in 1844, though probably this is an error, as it was <strong>the</strong>n<br />

35 feet high.<br />

e London says <strong>the</strong>re were two <strong>trees</strong> in <strong>the</strong> garden, both 50 feet high, which had flowered occasionally.<br />

6 There is a splendid Sophora in <strong>the</strong> grounds at Cobhara Park, Kent, which I measured in 1905, and found to be 85<br />

feet by 10 feet. There is also one in <strong>the</strong> Tilt Yard at Arundel Castle, 62 feet by 9 feet 6 inches. (H. J. E.)<br />

ARAUCARIA<br />

Araucaria, Jussieu, Gen. PI. 4 13 (1789); Benthara et Hooker, Gen. PI. iii. 437 (1880); Masters,<br />

Journ. Linn. Soc. (Bot.) xxx. 2 6 (1893).<br />

Dombeya, Lamarck, Diet. i i. 301 (non Cavanilles) (1786).<br />

TALL evergreen <strong>trees</strong>, with naked buds and coriaceous leaves, which are widest<br />

at <strong>the</strong>ir bases and spirally arranged on <strong>the</strong> shoots. 1 Usually dioecious. Male flowers<br />

in catkin-like masses, solitary or in fascicles at <strong>the</strong> ends <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> branchlets ; an<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

numerous, with a prolonged connective, from which hang six to fifteen pollen sacs.<br />

Female flowers terminal, composed <strong>of</strong> many scales spirally arranged in a continuous<br />

series with <strong>the</strong> leaves, <strong>the</strong>re being no obvious distinction between <strong>the</strong> seed-scale and<br />

<strong>the</strong> bract; each scale bears one ovule attached to <strong>the</strong> scale along its whole length.<br />

Cones globular, composed <strong>of</strong> imbricated wedge-shaped scales thickened at <strong>the</strong> apex.<br />

Seeds, one on each scale and adnate to it, flattened and without wings.<br />

The genera Araucaria and Agathis constitute <strong>the</strong> tribe Araucarinece, which are<br />

distinguished from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Conifene by having a single ovule on a simple scale.<br />

In Agathis <strong>the</strong> ovule is free from <strong>the</strong> scale, while in Araucaria it is united with it.<br />

Cunninghamia, which was considered by Bentham and Hooker and by Masters to<br />

belong to this tribe, is now generally classed with <strong>the</strong> Taxodinece ; in it each scale<br />

bears three ovules.<br />

There are about ten species <strong>of</strong> Araucaria, inhabitants <strong>of</strong> South America, Australia,<br />

New Guinea, New Hebrides, New Caledonia, and Norfolk Island. A raucaria<br />

Cunninghami has been reported several times as growing in <strong>the</strong> open air in England;<br />

but in some cases it is evident that Cunninghamia sinensis was <strong>the</strong> tree in question,<br />

while in o<strong>the</strong>r cases small plants were referred to which were speedily killed by <strong>the</strong><br />

cold <strong>of</strong> our winters. 2 Araucaria imbricata is <strong>the</strong> only species which is hardy in this<br />

country. There are fine specimens <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r species in <strong>the</strong> Temperate<br />

House at Kew, viz. A raucaria Bidwilli, 48 feet high; Araucaria excelsa, 48 feet;<br />

Araucaria Cunninghami, 47 feet; and Araucaria Cookii, 30 feet.<br />

1 Araucaria Bidwilli has <strong>the</strong> leaves also spirally arranged, but by twisting on <strong>the</strong>ir bases <strong>the</strong>y assume a pseudo-<br />

distichous appearance.<br />

2 In a letter in <strong>the</strong> Gardeners' Chronicle, May I, 1869, Mr James Barnes, <strong>the</strong>n gardener at Bicton, states, in reply to a<br />

suggestion that <strong>the</strong> tree <strong>the</strong>re might be Cunninghamia, that it was really Araucaria Cunninghami, and that it had attained a<br />

height <strong>of</strong> 36 feet, with a diameter <strong>of</strong> branches <strong>of</strong> 28 feet, in a sheltered plantation in that favourable locality. But this tree<br />

was no longer living when I visited Bicton in 1902. (II. J. E.)<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!