09.03.2013 Views

the trees of great britain & ireland - Facsimile Books & other digitally ...

the trees of great britain & ireland - Facsimile Books & other digitally ...

the trees of great britain & ireland - Facsimile Books & other digitally ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 The Trees <strong>of</strong> Great Britain and Ireland<br />

At Slindon Wood, near Petworth, Sussex, between <strong>the</strong> South Downs and <strong>the</strong><br />

sea, which is seven miles distant, on <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> Major Leslie, <strong>the</strong>re was in 1903<br />

one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> finest beech woods in England, growing on chalk soil, <strong>of</strong> which I have<br />

particulars from Mr. C. H. Greenwood, and <strong>of</strong> which I give an illustration from a<br />

photograph sent me by him (Plate 6). Mr. Greenwood states that 634 <strong>trees</strong><br />

were recently cut and sold in this wood, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m being 70 and several 80 to 90<br />

feet long to <strong>the</strong> first limb, and quarter girthing 20 inches in <strong>the</strong> middle. One tree now<br />

standing measures, without <strong>the</strong> top, 70' x 26" = 320 feet, and on one acre at <strong>the</strong> east<br />

side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wood are standing 60 which would average 150 feet each, making 9000<br />

cubic feet to <strong>the</strong> acre. The tallest tree is 90 feet to <strong>the</strong> first bough, with 21 inches<br />

£ girth = 275 feet. This is perhaps <strong>the</strong> largest yield <strong>of</strong> beech per acre <strong>of</strong> which I have<br />

any record in England.<br />

In Windsor Park <strong>the</strong>re are some fine old beeches, <strong>of</strong> which three are figured by<br />

Menzies. 1 His plate 4 shows a remarkable old pollard at Ascot Gate 30 feet in<br />

girth, which he supposed to be 800 years old, and ano<strong>the</strong>r, his plate 6, on<br />

Smith's lawn, <strong>of</strong> similar age and 31 feet 9 inches in girth. The third, Queen<br />

Adelaide's Beech, is a tree <strong>of</strong> no <strong>great</strong> size or beauty. It measured in 1864 8 feet<br />

6 inches in girth, when supposed by Menzies to be 140 years old. In 1904 it<br />

had only increased 10 inches in girth. The finest beech now growing at Windsor<br />

Mr. Simmonds, <strong>the</strong> deputy-surveyor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park, who was good enough to show<br />

it to me, agrees in this is a tree near Cranbourne Tower, which in March 1904<br />

measured 125 feet by 15, with a fine clean bole, but not equal to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Queen<br />

Beech at Ashridge.<br />

The two largest beech <strong>trees</strong>, <strong>of</strong> whose measurement I have exact particulars, were<br />

both blown down in <strong>the</strong> heavy gale <strong>of</strong> September 1903, I believe on <strong>the</strong> same night.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se was at Cowdray Park in Sussex, <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Earl <strong>of</strong> Egmont,<br />

and grew on sandy soil near <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>great</strong> chestnut avenue at a considerable<br />

elevation, perhaps 400 feet. I saw it lying on <strong>the</strong> ground not long after, and ob<br />

tained from Mr. Barber, steward on <strong>the</strong> estate, <strong>the</strong> following careful measure<br />

ments :<br />

Butt 22 feet by 72 inches £ girth =792 feet. Limbs measured down to 9 inches \ girth only,<br />

43 in number, contained 924 feet 6 inches. Total 1716 feet 6 inches. Measured on <strong>the</strong> ground<br />

2ist September 1903.<br />

The o<strong>the</strong>r was <strong>the</strong> <strong>great</strong> beech at Cornbury Park, <strong>of</strong> which I give a photograph<br />

taken after its fall (Plate 7), that gives an idea <strong>of</strong> its immense size. I saw <strong>the</strong><br />

stump <strong>of</strong> this tree two years afterwards, and counted about 230 rings in it, which<br />

justify <strong>the</strong> belief that it may have been planted by Evelyn. Mr. C. A. Fellowes,<br />

agent for <strong>the</strong> property, had <strong>the</strong> tree carefully measured after its fall, and gives its<br />

height as 120 feet, girth 21 feet 4 inches. Cubic contents 1796 feet (nothing under<br />

6 inches quarter girth being measured).<br />

A magnificent beech growing in Studley Park, <strong>the</strong> seat <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Marquis <strong>of</strong> Ripon,<br />

was figured by Loudon, iii. 1955, and is <strong>the</strong>re stated to have been 114 feet high.<br />

1 History <strong>of</strong> Windsor Great Park and Windsor Forest, 1 864.<br />

Fagus<br />

Mr. O. H. Wade, agent for <strong>the</strong> estate, tells me that this tree cannot now be<br />

identified.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r celebrated tree, mentioned by Loudon as Pontey's Beech, was measured<br />

for him in 1837 by <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Duke <strong>of</strong> Bedford in <strong>the</strong> Park at Woburn<br />

Abbey. It was <strong>the</strong>n 100 feet high, with a clean bole <strong>of</strong> 50 feet, and was 12 feet<br />

6 inches in girth at 4 feet. When visited in July 1903 it was about <strong>the</strong> same height<br />

and 14 feet 6 inches in girth, and was estimated to contain nearly 600 cubic feet.<br />

A tree known as <strong>the</strong> Corton Beech at Boyton, Wilts, once <strong>the</strong> home <strong>of</strong> Mr.<br />

Lambert, author <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Genus Pinus, and mentioned by Loudon as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

in England, was blown down a few years ago, and I have not been able to get its<br />

dimensions.<br />

There were some very fine beeches at Castle Howard, Yorkshire, <strong>the</strong> seat <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Earl <strong>of</strong> Carlisle, one <strong>of</strong> which Loudon gives as no feet by 14 feet 2 inches,<br />

with a clean bole <strong>of</strong> 70 feet, and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r as containing 940 feet <strong>of</strong> timber, but<br />

when I visited this fine place in 1905 I could not identify ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>trees</strong> as<br />

still standing, though I saw many in Raywood <strong>of</strong> <strong>great</strong> size, with clean boles <strong>of</strong> 50<br />

to 60 feet. A tree standing outside <strong>the</strong> garden wall was remarkable for <strong>the</strong> very<br />

rugged bark on its trunk, which up to 8 to 10 feet from <strong>the</strong> ground was more like<br />

that <strong>of</strong> an elm than a beech.<br />

In Scotland, though <strong>the</strong> beech does not attain quite <strong>the</strong> same height and size<br />

as in some parts <strong>of</strong> England, it is a fine and commonly planted tree.<br />

The self-layered beech at Newbattle Abbey near Dalkeith, <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Marquess <strong>of</strong> Lothian, eight miles from Edinburgh, must be looked on as <strong>the</strong><br />

most remarkable, if not <strong>the</strong> largest, <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> beeches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> park or spreading<br />

type now standing in Britain; and though difficult to represent such a tree by<br />

photography in a manner to show its <strong>great</strong> size, every pains has been taken by<br />

Mr. Wallace <strong>of</strong> Dalkeith to do it justice (Plates 8 and 9). This splendid tree<br />

is growing in light alluvial soil in front <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> house, and not far from <strong>the</strong> banks<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> North Esk river, and may be 300 years old or more. It was in London's<br />

time 88 feet high, and <strong>the</strong> trunk 9 feet in diameter (probably at <strong>the</strong> base), with<br />

a spread <strong>of</strong> branches <strong>of</strong> 100 feet. When I visited it in February 1904 under <strong>the</strong><br />

guidance <strong>of</strong> Mr. Ramsay, who has known <strong>the</strong> tree for many years, I made it<br />

about 105 feet high, with a girth at about 5 feet which is near <strong>the</strong> narrowest part<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bole <strong>of</strong> 21 feet 6 inches. The trunk, as will be seen from <strong>the</strong> figure, is<br />

unusual in shape, and shows no sign <strong>of</strong> decay except where one large limb has<br />

been blown <strong>of</strong>f, and this has been carefully covered with lead. But <strong>the</strong> numerous<br />

branches which have drooped to <strong>the</strong> ground, taken root, and formed a circle <strong>of</strong><br />

subsidiary stems round <strong>the</strong> main trunk, are its most peculiar feature, and may remain<br />

as large <strong>trees</strong> for centuries after <strong>the</strong> central stem decays. The first <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se has<br />

produced 7 stems <strong>of</strong> various sizes growing into fresh <strong>trees</strong>, at a distance <strong>of</strong> 8 to 12<br />

yards from <strong>the</strong> trunk. The second has 2 large and 3 smaller stems. The third<br />

has 3 large stems about 30 to 40 feet high and 3 to 4 feet in girth. The fourth has<br />

3 large and 6 smaller ones. The-fifth is not yet firmly rooted, but is fastened down in<br />

several places to prevent <strong>the</strong> wind from moving it. The total circumference <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!