the trees of great britain & ireland - Facsimile Books & other digitally ...
the trees of great britain & ireland - Facsimile Books & other digitally ...
the trees of great britain & ireland - Facsimile Books & other digitally ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
180 The Trees <strong>of</strong> Great Britain and Ireland Taxodium 181<br />
At Barton, Suffolk, <strong>the</strong>re are three <strong>trees</strong>, which measured in 1903, («) in <strong>the</strong><br />
Arboretum, 50 feet by 5 feet 5 inches, dying ; (b) a smaller tree beside it, in a worse<br />
condition; (c) on <strong>the</strong> lawn, 56 feet by 4 feet 3 inches. The latter tree 1 was planted<br />
in 1826, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two in 1831. It is evident that <strong>the</strong> dry though deep soil at<br />
Barton is not favourable to <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> this species.<br />
At Frogmore, Windsor, <strong>the</strong>re are two specimens very different in habit. One,<br />
a clean-stemmed tree, growing near water, but without knees, is 80 feet by<br />
8 feet 6 inches. The o<strong>the</strong>r, not so large, has a weeping habit, and is branched to<br />
<strong>the</strong> ground.<br />
At Strathfieldsaye <strong>the</strong>re is a tree, mentioned by Loudon as being 46 feet in<br />
height by 3 feet 4 inches in diameter, which I found in 1903 to be 63 feet high<br />
by 9 feet in girth. It is growing in stiff clay soil and has no knees; <strong>the</strong> stem is<br />
deeply furrowed.<br />
At Dropmore <strong>the</strong>re is a tree beside a pond, planted in 1843, ant^ now<br />
measuring 60 feet by 5 feet 9 inches.<br />
At South Lodge, Enfield, a tree is growing near water, with small knees,<br />
which, measured by Henry in 1904, was 77 feet by n feet 10 inches.<br />
At Combe Abbey, Warwickshire, Mr. W. Miller 2 reports that a tree, mentioned<br />
by Loudon as 47 feet by 2 feet 3 inches in 1843, nacl attained, in 1887, 75 feet by<br />
11 feet 6 inches at 3 feet from <strong>the</strong> ground.<br />
At Longford Castle,3 Salisbury, <strong>the</strong>re are two <strong>trees</strong>, growing within a few yards<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river Avon. One, very tall, has a straight trunk free from branches for about<br />
30 feet, and a girth <strong>of</strong> 8 feet 10 inches at 4 feet from <strong>the</strong> ground. The o<strong>the</strong>r is<br />
6 feet in girth, and branches at 7 feet up.<br />
At Brockett's Park, near Hatfield, <strong>the</strong> residence <strong>of</strong> Lord Mountstephen, <strong>the</strong>re<br />
are many <strong>trees</strong> planted along a walk on <strong>the</strong> banks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lee, and forming an<br />
irregular line in which <strong>the</strong> <strong>trees</strong> vary very much in size. In <strong>the</strong> sheltered part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
valley, where <strong>the</strong> soil and situation are very favourable, <strong>the</strong>y average 70 to 80 feet<br />
high, <strong>the</strong> best I measured being 80 feet by 10 feet and 86 feet by 9 feet. But lower<br />
down <strong>the</strong> stream, where <strong>the</strong> valley is more exposed to <strong>the</strong> wind, <strong>the</strong>y are stunted,<br />
and not more than half <strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> those above. There are knees on some <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>trees</strong> overgrown with moss and meadowsweet, but not so large as those<br />
at Syon.<br />
At Upper Nutwell, near Exeter, <strong>the</strong>re is a tree which Mr. G. H. Hodgkinson<br />
informed me in June 1904 was 84 feet high by n feet 9 inches in girth.<br />
Large <strong>trees</strong> have been reported at many o<strong>the</strong>r places, especially in <strong>the</strong> south <strong>of</strong><br />
England, viz.:<br />
Connington Castle, 4 Huntingdonshire, a tree 70 feet by 7 feet in 1877;<br />
Watford, 5 Herts, 85 feet by 14 feet in 1884; Stanwell,6 Surrey, a tree 13 feet in<br />
girth in 1904; Embley, 7 near Romsey, Hampshire, a tree 8f feet in girth in 1872,<br />
standing on <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> a hill.<br />
1 Bunbury, Arboretum Notes, 1 61.<br />
4 Ibid. 1 877, x"- 405.<br />
7 Bunbury, Arboretum Notes, 1 61,<br />
2 Card. Chron. 1 905, xxxvii. 12.<br />
6 Woods and Forests, 1 884, p. 546.<br />
3 Can/en, 1 890, xxxvii. 538.<br />
8 Reported by Sir Hugh Beevor<br />
I have seen no <strong>trees</strong> in Scotland <strong>of</strong> any size, and Henry has heard <strong>of</strong> none in<br />
Ireland, but <strong>the</strong>re is one in <strong>the</strong> Edinburgh Botanic Gardens 31 feet by 3 feet in 1905.<br />
r<br />
TIMBER<br />
According to Sargent <strong>the</strong> timber is light and s<strong>of</strong>t, close, straight grained, not<br />
strong, easily worked, and very durable in contact with <strong>the</strong> soil. It is largely used<br />
for building, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> houses in Louisiana and <strong>the</strong> Gulf States being built from<br />
it, and large quantities are also now exported to <strong>the</strong> North, where it is found a most<br />
valuable wood for doors, sashes, balustrades, and greenhouses.<br />
The Stearns Lumber Company <strong>of</strong> Boston, U.S.A., are making a speciality <strong>of</strong><br />
it, and from a pamphlet published by this firm I take <strong>the</strong> following particulars:<br />
The timber varies considerably in different localities, and <strong>the</strong>y consider, after<br />
long experience, that <strong>the</strong> so-called Gulf Cypress, grown in Florida, is better than <strong>the</strong><br />
Louisiana Red Cypress, or that from <strong>the</strong> Atlantic coast <strong>of</strong> Georgia. Far<strong>the</strong>r north<br />
it is apt to be more shaky and <strong>of</strong> coarser grain; and it is claimed that <strong>the</strong> seasoning<br />
is better done in <strong>the</strong> South than in <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn States, from one to five years<br />
being required to do this properly, according to <strong>the</strong> dimensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> timber, and<br />
that <strong>the</strong> longer in reason that it is kept in <strong>the</strong> pile before using <strong>the</strong> better.<br />
It is said to be more durable, and to shrink and swell less than spruce or pine,<br />
to take paint well, and, as it contains no pitch, to resist fire longer than o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
coniferous woods.<br />
It is quoted from <strong>the</strong> Richmond Despatch that a house, built by Michael Braun<br />
in 1776, and still owned and occupied by his descendants, was covered with cypress<br />
shingles, which were only removed in 1880.<br />
Such shingles are now made by machinery at a very low price, and would be<br />
well worth trying for ro<strong>of</strong>ing houses in England, as <strong>the</strong>y are very light in weight<br />
and inexpensive, and though I have no evidence that <strong>the</strong>y are better than shingles<br />
made from English oak, <strong>the</strong>ir much <strong>great</strong>er size makes <strong>the</strong>m easier to lay, and <strong>the</strong>y<br />
can be cut to fancy patterns, which makes <strong>the</strong>m very ornamental for ro<strong>of</strong>ing.<br />
This wood is also highly recommended for doors, sashes, tanks, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
purposes where a <strong>great</strong> power <strong>of</strong> enduring damp is required.<br />
It occasionally produces very ornamental wood, which is mottled and grained<br />
with red and brown, and some doors made <strong>of</strong> this wood, two <strong>of</strong> which I now possess,<br />
are extremely handsome.<br />
Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> wood grown in England will prove equally good I cannot say, as<br />
large <strong>trees</strong> are so seldom cut down in England that I have been unable to try it,<br />
but would certainly advise anyone who may have <strong>the</strong> opportunity to do so.<br />
(H. J. E.)