The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

clanstrachan.org
from clanstrachan.org More from this publisher
08.03.2013 Views

52 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i of this period, as will appear in the sequel, to ascertain exactl\- the nature of that title, and of the territorial divisions of Scot- fortunately these ancient authorities land at the time ; and have left us sufficient materials for that purpose. A comparison of the different facts recorded regarding that office, will lead to the following" results. First.—-The office of Maormor appears to have been next in dignity and power to that of the king ; thus, the Annals of Ulster, in describing took place between the Scots • one of the numerous battles which and the Danes in the tenth centur}-, add " that many of the Scots were killed, but that neither king nor Maormor of them were lost in the ^ conflict." Besides this, the Pictish Chronicle frequently records the death of some of the Maormors as well as that of the king. Second.—-We always find the title of Maormor associated and connected with one or other of the great districts into which Scotland was at that time divided ; thus, the Annals of Ulster mention the Maormor of Moray,—the Pictish Chronicle, the Maormors of Angus, Atholl, &c.— the Annals of Innisfallen, and that connexion was apparently so the Maormor of Mar ; close and intimate, as to enable them at times to 'wage inde- pendent war with the Third.— Every king of Scotland himself notice regarding the succession of the Maormors which has reached us, proves that they observed a rule of succession strictly hereditary. Of this many examples might be given, but perhaps the strongest will be found in the succession of the Maormors of Moray. In 1032, the Annals of Ulster mention the death of Gil- comgain Mac Maolbride, Maormor of Mureve. Afterwards in 1058, they have the death of Lulac Mac Gilcovigan^ king of Scotland ; and in 1085, the death of Maolsnechtan Mac Lulach, king or Maormor of Mureve. Here we see that although one of the Maormors of Moray had obtained possession of the throne of Scotland, yet on his being driven from that prominent station, his son appears as Maormor of Moray. The history of the same family also shews very clearly that the succession to the dignity of Maormor was strictly a male 1 An. Ult. ad an. 917.

CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 53 succession, for in the beginning of the eleventh century we find Malcolm Mac Maolbride, the Maormor of Moray, in possession of the throne of Scotland ; and although it appears from the Sagas, that Sigurd, earl of Orkney, married Malcolm's daughter, and that on Malcolm's death, Thorfinn, earl of Orkney, his grandson, was his nearest heir according to feudal principles, yet we find that he A\-as succeeded in Moray by his brother Gilcomgan Mac Maolbride, to whose posterity also his claim to the throne of Scotland descended. Fourth.—Not only were the Maormors so intimately connected with the great districts of Scotland as to shew that they must have possessed in them considerable power and extent of terri- tory, but they also appear as the hereditary leaders of great tribes, as well as the hereditary governors of these districts. For in the year 1020, Tighernac mentions the death of Finlay Mac Ruairi, Maonuor of the Clan Croeb, or sons of Croeb, by the children of his brother Maolbride. This is a very important fact, for it shews that the Gaelic population of the north of Scot- land was divided into great tribes, corresponding to the great and that over each of these territorial divisions of the countrv ; ml tribes, the Maormor of the district was hereditary lord, and con- sequently it follows from this fact, that the Maormors were of the same race with the people whom they governed. Fifth.— Further, this title of Maormor was quite peculiar to the Gaelic people, who at this period inhabited Scotland. It is im- possible, on examining the history of this early period, to avoid being struck with this fact, and the remark has accordingly been very generally made by the later historians. It was altogether unknown among the Irish, although they were also a Gaelic mentions Maormors people ; for although Tighernac frequently of Alban as being engaged in many of the feuds in Ireland, yet we never find that title given by any of the Annalists to an Irish chief In Britain the title was confined to the north of Scotland, and although many of the Saxon and Norman barons and other foreigners obtained extensive territories in Scotland, and even at an early period not unfrequently succeeded by marriage to the possessions and powers of some of the Maormors, yet we never find them appearing under that title. From this it is plain, that whenever we find a person bearing the title of

52 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i<br />

<strong>of</strong> this period, as will appear in the sequel, to ascertain exactl\-<br />

the nature <strong>of</strong> that title, and <strong>of</strong> the territorial divisions <strong>of</strong> Scot-<br />

fortunately these ancient authorities<br />

land at the time ; and<br />

have left us sufficient materials for that purpose. A comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> the different facts recorded regarding that <strong>of</strong>fice, will lead<br />

to the following" results.<br />

First.—-<strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> Maormor appears to have been next<br />

in dignity and power to that <strong>of</strong> the king ; thus, the Annals<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ulster, in describing<br />

took place between the Scots •<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the numerous battles which<br />

and the Danes in the tenth<br />

centur}-, add " that many <strong>of</strong> the Scots were killed, but that<br />

neither king nor Maormor <strong>of</strong> them were lost in the ^<br />

conflict."<br />

Besides this, the Pictish Chronicle frequently records the death<br />

<strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the Maormors as well as that <strong>of</strong> the king.<br />

Second.—-We always find the title <strong>of</strong> Maormor associated<br />

and connected with one or other <strong>of</strong> the great districts into which<br />

<strong>Scotland</strong> was at that time divided ; thus, the Annals <strong>of</strong> Ulster<br />

mention the Maormor <strong>of</strong> Moray,—the Pictish Chronicle, the<br />

Maormors <strong>of</strong> Angus, Atholl, &c.— the Annals <strong>of</strong> Innisfallen,<br />

and that connexion was apparently so<br />

the Maormor <strong>of</strong> Mar ;<br />

close and intimate, as to enable them at times to 'wage inde-<br />

pendent war with the Third.—<br />

Every<br />

king <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> himself<br />

notice regarding the succession <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Maormors which has reached us, proves that they observed<br />

a rule <strong>of</strong> succession strictly hereditary. Of this many examples<br />

might be given, but perhaps the strongest will be found in<br />

the succession <strong>of</strong> the Maormors <strong>of</strong> Moray.<br />

In 1032, the Annals <strong>of</strong> Ulster mention the death <strong>of</strong> Gil-<br />

comgain Mac Maolbride, Maormor <strong>of</strong> Mureve. Afterwards<br />

in 1058, they have the death <strong>of</strong> Lulac Mac Gilcovigan^ king<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> ; and in 1085, the death <strong>of</strong> Maolsnechtan Mac<br />

Lulach, king or Maormor <strong>of</strong> Mureve. Here we see that although<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the Maormors <strong>of</strong> Moray had obtained possession <strong>of</strong><br />

the throne <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>, yet on his being driven from that<br />

prominent station, his son appears as Maormor <strong>of</strong> Moray. <strong>The</strong><br />

history <strong>of</strong> the same family also shews very clearly that the<br />

succession to the dignity <strong>of</strong> Maormor was strictly a male<br />

1 An. Ult. ad an. 917.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!