The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society
The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society
40 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti must have been descended either from the Scottish or the Pictish Hnc. But the name of Scotland appears never to have been applied to North Britain before that date, but rather to have subsequently extended itself gradually over the whole country, and to have at last superseded the more ancient appellation of Albion or Albania. It is consequently to be inferred that the later kings were of the Scottish race, and that the Scots had obtained a preponderance over the Picts ; besides this inference, which results naturally from the argument, the whole authorities for the early history of Scotland concur in establishing the fact, that Kenneth, the first monarch who ruled over the whole country, was of the Scottish race. Third.—When we consider that the name of Scotland did not spread rapidly over the country, but that it was many centuries before that appellation comprehended the whole of Scotland, and also that the first four or five kings of the line of Kenneth are termed by the Irish annalists kings of the Picts, and not of the Scots, or of Scotland, we must infer that the effects produced by the conquest did not extend to the whole of the Picts, but that a very considerable part of them must have remained altogether unaffected by the invasion, and that the name of Scotland must have spread over the country, rather from the fact of its kings being derived from that race, and of their political pre-eminence, than from an actual subjugation of all the Pictish tribes, as feigned by the Scottish historians ; a theory the absurdity of which it is impossible not to perceive, if we look at the state of Scotland in 731, and the very great superiority of the Picts over the Scots in power, extent of territor)', and in numbers. Fourth.— If we find, subsequent to the year 843, or the date of the supposed conquest, any part of the Pictish nation appear- ing as a body, under a peculiar national name, and apparently distinguished by that name from the rest of Scotland, it is manifest that that tribe could have formed no part of the Scottish conquest, and must have retained their territory and their independence, notwithstanding the subjugation of the rest of the countr)^ But we find from the Irish annalists, that as late as the year 865, the northern Picts appear as a distinct
CHAP. Ill] OF SCOTLAND 41 people from the rest of Scotland, under their ancient peculiar and name of Cruithen tuath, or CruitJuie of the North. We must consequently conclude that the Cruithne were not affected by the conquest, but remained a peculiar and distinct people for many years afterwards. The northern Picts, however, are not the only exceptions ; for the Strath Clyde Britons exhibit a parallel instance of the same thing. They are frequently mentioned after the date of the conquest, by their peculiar national appellation. i\nd we know from history that they were not included in the conquest, but remained for a long period independent, and under the government of their own kings. Not only, however, do the northern Picts appear as a distinct body under their peculiar appellation of Cruithne, as late as the year 865, but we even find that their territories, consisting of the whole of Scotland north of the Grampains, retained the appellation of Pictavia as late as the year 894. This appears very clear from the Pictish Chronicle, for in 865, when the annals of Ulster mention that the Northmen ravaged the Cruithen tuath, or northern Picts, the Pictish Chronicle, in relating the same event, uses the expression Pictavia, instead of Cruithen tuath. After- wards, in 894, the Pictish Chronicle mentions that the Norwegians conquered Pictavia, but we know from the Norse Sagas that this conquest was confined to the country north of the Grampians. Wherever the Norwegians ravaged other parts of the country, the Pictish Chronicle invariably uses the expression Albania instead of Pictavia. If the northern Picts appear as a distinct people, retaining their ancient appellation so late as the year 865, and if their territories also retained the name of Pictavia as late as the end of the ninth century, it is evident that that territory could not have been comprised within those conquered by the Scots, and that the name of Scotland must have spread over that part of the country from other causes than that of conquest. This result is confirmed by all the native writers of Scotland, who invariably confine the Scottish conquest to the country south of the Grampians, although they err in supposing that the country north of that range had been previously in possession of the Scots.
- Page 24 and 25: xiv LI VK OF DR. SKENE connection a
- Page 26 and 27: xvi CONTENTS CHAPTER \' C^icneral H
- Page 28: XVIU CONTENTS CHAPTER IX.
- Page 33 and 34: THE HIGHLANDERS OF SCOTLAND. CHAPTE
- Page 35 and 36: CHAP. I] OFSCOTLAND 3 cipally the T
- Page 37 and 38: CHAP. I] OFSCOTLAND 5 tants of Brit
- Page 39 and 40: CHAP. l] OF SCOTLAND Caledonians du
- Page 41: 7. o o en £1- ^ ^ "^ ??
- Page 44 and 45: 10 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i Orosius
- Page 46 and 47: 12 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti Secondly,
- Page 48 and 49: H THE HIGHLANDERS [parti ' CHAPTER
- Page 50 and 51: i6 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti finibus,
- Page 52 and 53: i8 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti about the
- Page 54 and 55: 20 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i and was
- Page 56 and 57: 22 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti We have t
- Page 58 and 59: 24 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i mous wit
- Page 60 and 61: 26 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti On examin
- Page 62 and 63: 28 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i same rul
- Page 64 and 65: 30 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i CHAPTER
- Page 66 and 67: 32 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti his cousi
- Page 68 and 69: 34 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i Muredach
- Page 70 and 71: 36 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i to have
- Page 72 and 73: 8 THE HIGHLANDERS [part I dent, and
- Page 76 and 77: 42 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i Upon com
- Page 78 and 79: 44 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti CHAPTER I
- Page 80 and 81: 46 THE HIGHLANDERS [part r colony,
- Page 82 and 83: 48 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti Teutonic
- Page 84 and 85: 50 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i triumpha
- Page 86 and 87: 52 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i of this
- Page 88 and 89: 54 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i Maormor,
- Page 90 and 91: 56 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i The hist
- Page 92 and 93: 58 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i CHAPTER
- Page 94 and 95: 6o THE HIGHLANDERS [part i this per
- Page 96 and 97: 62 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti kingdom,
- Page 98 and 99: 64 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i Now, whe
- Page 100 and 101: 66 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i Creones
- Page 102 and 103: 68 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i of it as
- Page 104 and 105: 70 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti although,
- Page 106 and 107: 72 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i the terr
- Page 108 and 109: 74 THE HIGHLANDERS [paPxT r men and
- Page 110 and 111: 76 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i any resi
- Page 112 and 113: ;8 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i English,
- Page 114 and 115: So T in=: HIGHLANDERS [part i to ru
- Page 116 and 117: 82 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i had prob
- Page 118 and 119: 84 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i Bane and
- Page 120 and 121: 86 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i of David
- Page 122 and 123: 88 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i In the m
40 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti<br />
must have been descended either from the Scottish or the Pictish<br />
Hnc. But the name <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> appears never to have been<br />
applied to North Britain before that date, but rather to have<br />
subsequently extended itself gradually over the whole country,<br />
and to have at last superseded the more ancient appellation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Albion or Albania. It is consequently to be inferred<br />
that the later kings were <strong>of</strong> the Scottish race, and that<br />
the Scots had obtained a preponderance over the Picts ;<br />
besides this inference, which results naturally from the argument,<br />
the whole authorities for the early history <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong><br />
concur in establishing the fact, that Kenneth, the first<br />
monarch who ruled over the whole country, was <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Scottish race.<br />
Third.—When we consider that the name <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> did<br />
not spread rapidly over the country, but that it was many<br />
centuries before that appellation comprehended the whole <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Scotland</strong>, and also that the first four or five kings <strong>of</strong> the line<br />
<strong>of</strong> Kenneth are termed by the Irish annalists kings <strong>of</strong> the Picts,<br />
and not <strong>of</strong> the Scots, or <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>, we must infer that the<br />
effects produced by the conquest did not extend to the whole <strong>of</strong><br />
the Picts, but that a very considerable part <strong>of</strong> them must have<br />
remained altogether unaffected by the invasion, and that the<br />
name <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> must have spread over the country, rather<br />
from the fact <strong>of</strong> its kings being derived from that race, and<br />
<strong>of</strong> their political pre-eminence, than from an actual subjugation<br />
<strong>of</strong> all the Pictish tribes, as feigned by the Scottish historians ;<br />
a theory the absurdity <strong>of</strong> which it is impossible not to perceive,<br />
if we look at the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> in 731, and the very great<br />
superiority <strong>of</strong> the Picts over the Scots in power, extent <strong>of</strong><br />
territor)', and in numbers.<br />
Fourth.— If we find, subsequent to the year 843, or the date<br />
<strong>of</strong> the supposed conquest, any part <strong>of</strong> the Pictish nation appear-<br />
ing as a body, under a peculiar national name, and apparently<br />
distinguished by that name from the rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>, it is<br />
manifest that that tribe could have formed no part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Scottish conquest, and must have retained their territory and<br />
their independence, notwithstanding the subjugation <strong>of</strong> the rest<br />
<strong>of</strong> the countr)^ But we find from the Irish annalists, that as<br />
late as the year 865, the northern Picts appear as a distinct