The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

clanstrachan.org
from clanstrachan.org More from this publisher
08.03.2013 Views

4o8 THE HIGHLANDERS [excursus improvement took —when place the kilt or philabeg was invented— is not known to a hundred years. It was during the Lowland wars of the 17th and 18th centuries. Some have even asserted the improvement was made in the early iSth century at the instigation of the Iron Companies that then bought the Highland woods. Page 157. The Seven Provinces of Scotland. Dr. Skene makes too much of these seven earldoms. It is possible that in or about 800 a.d. the Pictish Kingdom was divided into the seven provinces mentioned. The sons of Cruithne are named in the best MSS. as follows ;— Cait, Ce, Cirig [Circinn], a warlike clan, Fib, Pidach, Fotla, Fdrtrenn, Cait is Caithness ; Circin is Magh-Chircinn or Mearns ; Fib is Fife ; Fothla is Athole ; Fortrenn is Menteith. But what are Ce and Fidach ? Evidently Mar and Moray. Ce may appear in Keith. Page 158, note. Gouerin is surely Cowrie. Skene's Garmoran is a continual nuisance. Page 163, the lists. The attempt to explain the 30 Brudes m this way is more than obsolete. Page 176, line 21. The Northern Picts in the 9th and loth centuries were overrun by Scots and Norse-men, and made less Pictish than any part of Scotland. The Norse-men had the Province of Cat ; the Scots had the West Coast, and were masters of the Mormaership of Moray. He allows the conquest of the Southern Picts by the Scots. Consequently, the chiefs of the older Highland clans can well claim to be either Scots or Norse. Page 177, line 11 from bottom. "Barbarous Scottish hordes"! Why, the Scots were the most learned people of Western Europe then ! were the barbarians. The Picts Page 176, line 12. The 14150 MS. Dr. Skene has made much use of this MS.— overmuch use. As far as the Macdonald genealogies go, the MS. reproduces the Book of Ballimote, and otherwise depends on that work. Where it stands alone, as in the case of clans Chattan, Cameron, Mackenzie, Ross, Matheson, Macfee, Macgregor, Maclaren, Mackay (of Perthshire), and Maclagans, it has to be used with caution, even as late as 1400. The genealogies end from 1400 to 1450. The IMS. is now undecipherable, owing to the employment of chemicals by its first editors. Page 181, line 5. The MS. here alluded to is the famous Dean of Lismore's Book, published in 1S62. Pages 184, 185. John Elder's views. This rascally turncoat tells Henry VIII. that the Redshanks were Picts, and that they were racially the old stock descended from the mythical Brutus, and hence naturally belonged to Ikitain and England. The story of descent from Scota, or from the Scots, he repudiates. In fact he takes up Edward I.'s position in his letter to the Pope about his claims on Scotland ; the Scots, with Bruce at their head, claimed independence as being from Ireland, descended of Scota. Dr. Skene favours the English view I The two stories aie myths ; they are not even traditions. Page 186, line 16. The extraordinary statement made here that we first hear of the Scota descent in 1320 in the letter to the Pope is contradicted by

AND NOTES] OFSCOTLAND 409 many documents, and all Irish history. See Picts and Scots Chronicles passim. Page 187, line 4 from end. The idea of " Highland chief" was first translated by "capitanus"; it implies nothing as to descent. Chapter II. The G.a.ll-G.\idheil. As already said, these were the mixed Norse and Gaels dwelling in the Western Isles and along the west coast from Galloway to Cape Wrath, afterwards reduced to the Kingdom of Man and the Isles. The Gael portion seem to have turned heathen, thinking Thor more powerful than Christ. The Hebrides were completely Norse. The term Vikingr Skotar of course applies to the Gaels among these Gall-Gaidheil ; but the Norse were by far the more numerous in the combined nationality, if it may be so termed. The Gall-Gaidheil never held any part of Perthshire— Dunkeld or any other place (p. 192). Page 191. Battle of Brunanburgh. There were two Anlafs present. Anlaf Cuaran, son of Sitric, son of Imar, claimant to Deira, and Anlaf, son of Godfred, King of Dublin and Cumberland. The former was Norse paternally, despite a Saga reference. See Skene himself on the point in Celtic Scotland, '• 353- Page 197. So.MERLED. He was "regulus of Argyll," which the Norse called Dalir, and his family the Dalverja. This is simply the old name Dalriada, which the Norse Sagas claim to ha\e been often conquered and held by their Kings and Earls. Somerled's name is Norse— Sumarlidhi, "summer-slider," that is, "mariner." He was son of Gille-brighde, son of Gille-adamnan. These two names are thoroughly Gaelic. The genealogy then gives "son of Solam (Solomund?) son of Imergi, son of Suibne, son of Nialgusa." Imergi or ]\Iergad is conjectured to be the kinglet lehmarc who submitted to Canute in 1031, Macbeth being the other. On the whole, Somerled may be regarded as a Gael ruling independently over the mixed Norse and Gael of Argyleshire, the Gael being there predominant in numbers, though not in martial activity. In Somerled's is genealogy Suibne, son of Nialgusa. Skene makes him Suibne, son of Kenneth (p. 198), to fit his Suibne, son of Kenneth, King of the Gall-Gaidheil, who died in 1034. He deliberately charges the genealogist with here tampering with the facts ; but really why should the genealogist do so? He had gone back far enough, in all conscience. This Kenneth is made King of Galloway in Skene's " Picts and Scots " ! Page 199, line 25. The MS. here referred to is the Red Book of Clanranald (Reliquice Cclticcc, vol. ii. p. 154). Page 200, line 17. The date here should be 1135. David's conquest of Man, Bute, and Arran is not mentioned in Celtic Scotland, and seems mythical. David had some claim oxer Kintyre as monastic charters show (Orig. Par. vol. ii. part i. p. i). Page 200, line 7 from end. The sons of JNIalcolm Mac-Heth were nephews of Somerled (nepotes then meant nephew). Malcolm himself was brother to Angus of Moray, whose father Aed was husband of King Lulach's daughter. Malcolm's history is mixed up with that of an impostor — Bishop Wymund of Man—who asserted that he was Malcolm Mac-Heth. The surname is now Mackay. See further note to p. 279.

4o8 THE HIGHLANDERS [excursus<br />

improvement took —when place the kilt or philabeg was invented— is not<br />

known to a hundred years. It was during the Lowland wars <strong>of</strong> the 17th and<br />

18th centuries. Some have even asserted the improvement was made in the<br />

early iSth century at the instigation <strong>of</strong> the Iron Companies that then bought<br />

the Highland woods.<br />

Page 157. <strong>The</strong> Seven Provinces <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>. Dr. Skene makes too<br />

much <strong>of</strong> these seven earldoms. It is possible that in or about 800 a.d. the<br />

Pictish Kingdom was divided into the seven provinces mentioned. <strong>The</strong> sons<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cruithne are named in the best MSS. as follows ;—<br />

Cait, Ce, Cirig [Circinn], a warlike clan,<br />

Fib, Pidach, Fotla, Fdrtrenn,<br />

Cait is Caithness ; Circin is Magh-Chircinn or Mearns ; Fib is Fife ; Fothla<br />

is Athole ; Fortrenn is Menteith. But what are Ce and Fidach ? Evidently<br />

Mar and Moray. Ce may appear in Keith.<br />

Page 158, note. Gouerin is surely Cowrie. Skene's Garmoran is a<br />

continual nuisance.<br />

Page 163, the lists. <strong>The</strong> attempt to explain the 30 Brudes m this way is<br />

more than obsolete.<br />

Page 176, line 21. <strong>The</strong> Northern Picts in the 9th and loth centuries<br />

were overrun by Scots and Norse-men, and made less Pictish than any part<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Norse-men had the Province <strong>of</strong> Cat ; the Scots had the<br />

West Coast, and were masters <strong>of</strong> the Mormaership <strong>of</strong> Moray. He allows the<br />

conquest <strong>of</strong> the Southern Picts by the Scots. Consequently, the chiefs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

older Highland clans can well claim to be either Scots or Norse.<br />

Page 177, line 11 from bottom. "Barbarous Scottish hordes"! Why,<br />

the Scots were the most learned people <strong>of</strong> Western Europe then !<br />

were the barbarians.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Picts<br />

Page 176, line 12. <strong>The</strong> 14150 MS. Dr. Skene has made much use <strong>of</strong> this<br />

MS.— overmuch use. As far as the Macdonald genealogies go, the MS.<br />

reproduces the Book <strong>of</strong> Ballimote, and otherwise depends on that work.<br />

Where it stands alone, as in the case <strong>of</strong> clans Chattan, Cameron, Mackenzie,<br />

Ross, Matheson, Macfee, Macgregor, Maclaren, Mackay (<strong>of</strong> Perthshire), and<br />

Maclagans, it has to be used with caution, even as late as 1400. <strong>The</strong><br />

genealogies end from 1400 to 1450. <strong>The</strong> IMS. is now undecipherable, owing<br />

to the employment <strong>of</strong> chemicals by its first editors.<br />

Page 181, line 5. <strong>The</strong> MS. here alluded to is the famous Dean <strong>of</strong><br />

Lismore's Book, published in 1S62.<br />

Pages 184, 185. John Elder's views. This rascally turncoat tells Henry<br />

VIII. that the Redshanks were Picts, and that they were racially the old<br />

stock descended from the mythical Brutus, and hence naturally belonged to<br />

Ikitain and England. <strong>The</strong> story <strong>of</strong> descent from Scota, or from the Scots,<br />

he repudiates. In fact he takes up Edward I.'s position in his letter to the<br />

Pope about his claims on <strong>Scotland</strong> ; the Scots, with Bruce at their head,<br />

claimed independence as being from Ireland, descended <strong>of</strong> Scota. Dr.<br />

Skene favours the English view I <strong>The</strong> two stories aie myths ; they are not<br />

even traditions.<br />

Page 186, line 16. <strong>The</strong> extraordinary statement made here that we first<br />

hear <strong>of</strong> the Scota descent in 1320 in the letter to the Pope is contradicted by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!