The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

clanstrachan.org
from clanstrachan.org More from this publisher
08.03.2013 Views

264 THE HIGHLANDERS [part ii family, to which they were entitled to succeed, or as a com- pensation fur the loss of the crown. The earldom was enjoyed in succession by his son Malcolm, and his grandson Henry, and on the death of the latter, in the beginning of the thirteenth century, his granddaughters, by his eldest son, who predeceased him, carried the earldom into the families of Galloway and Hastings, from whom it latterly came to the family of De Strathboggie.i When the Celtic earls of Atholl thus became extinct, and in consequence the subordinate clans assumed independence, we find the principal part of Atholl in the possession of the clan Donnachie or Robertsons. Clan Dotuiachie. The tradition which has hitherto been received of this clan, indicates, that they are a branch of the clan Donald, and that Duncan Reamhar, the first of the Robertsons of Struan, was a son of Angus Mor, lord of the Isles. Unfortunately, the Robertsons are not one of the clans noticed in the manuscript of 1450 ; but nevertheless, that manuscript affords a strong presumption that this tradition is unfounded,— for although it details all the branches of the Macdonalds with great minute- ness and accuracy, and especially the descendants of the sons of Angus Mor, it does not include the Robertsons among them, and this presumption will appear the stronger when we consider not only the great extent of territory which this Duncan, as we shall afterwards see, possessed in the district of Atholl, but that the arms of the two families are quite different, and that they do not appear ever to have had any connection, as a clan, with the Macdonalds. There is also another fact which renders it impossible that this Duncan could have been the son of Angus of the Isles, and which consequently throws additional doubt upon the tradition, viz., that in several charters Duncan is designated " filius Andrece de Atholia,"^ and this designation '' de At/iolia" continued in the family for several generations afterwards. • The peerage writers have been teenth century there is scarcely a more than usually inaccurate in their single step in the genealogy which account of the earldom of Atholl. is correctly given in the peerage. From its origin down to the four- 2 Eobertson's Index.

CHAP. V] OF SCOTLAND 265 The real descent of the family is indicated by their desig- nation, which was uniformly and exclusively de Atholia. It is scarcely possible to conceive, that the mere fact of a stranger possessing a considerable extent of territory in the earldom, should entitle him to use such a designation. Atholia was the name of a comitatus, and after the accession of David I the comitatus was as purely a Norman barony as any baronia or dominium in the country. It will not be denied that the name of the barony was exclusively used by its possessors and their descendants, and that the possession of a territorial name of barony as surely marks out a descent from some of the ancient barons, as if every step of the genealogy could be proved ; and if we turn to the other earldoms in Scotland, we find it to be invariably the case, that those families whose peculiar designation is the name of the earldom, are the male descendants of the ancient earls. Thus the Northern families of " De Ross" can all be traced to the earls of that district, and the case is the same with Sutherland, Mar, Angus, Strathern, Fife, Menteith, and Lenox. The only apparent exception to the rule is in the case of the earldom of Moray, and in that the origin of the family of De Moravia is altogether unknown, so that the probability is equally great that that family is descended from the former earls of Moray, as that they were foreigners. Further, although many families have at different times obtained extensive territories in several of the earldoms, even greater in proportion than those of the Robertsons, yet not a single instance can be found of any of these families assuming a designation from the earldom in which their territories were situated, nor is it possible to produce a single family not descended from the ancient earls who bear the name of the earldom. The designation De Atholia thus distinctly indicates a descent from the ancient earls of Atholl, but the history of their lands points to the same result. The possessions of Duncan de Atholia, who is considered the first of the Robert- sons of Struan, consisted, so far as can be ascertained, of three classes. ist. Those lands, afterwards erected into the barony of Struan, of which Glenerochie formed the principal part, and which were strictly a male fief 2d. The barony of Disher and Toyer, comprehending the greater part of the present disti'ict

264 THE HIGHLANDERS [part ii<br />

family, to which they were entitled to succeed, or as a com-<br />

pensation fur the loss <strong>of</strong> the crown. <strong>The</strong> earldom was enjoyed<br />

in succession by his son Malcolm, and his grandson Henry, and<br />

on the death <strong>of</strong> the latter, in the beginning <strong>of</strong> the thirteenth<br />

century, his granddaughters, by his eldest son, who predeceased<br />

him, carried the earldom into the families <strong>of</strong> Galloway and<br />

Hastings, from whom it latterly came to the family <strong>of</strong> De<br />

Strathboggie.i When the Celtic earls <strong>of</strong> Atholl thus became<br />

extinct, and in consequence the subordinate clans assumed<br />

independence, we find the principal part <strong>of</strong> Atholl in the<br />

possession <strong>of</strong> the clan Donnachie or Robertsons.<br />

<strong>Clan</strong> Dotuiachie.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tradition which has hitherto been received <strong>of</strong> this clan,<br />

indicates, that they are a branch <strong>of</strong> the clan Donald, and that<br />

Duncan Reamhar, the first <strong>of</strong> the Robertsons <strong>of</strong> Struan, was<br />

a son <strong>of</strong> Angus Mor, lord <strong>of</strong> the Isles. Unfortunately, the<br />

Robertsons are not one <strong>of</strong> the clans noticed in the manuscript<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1450 ; but nevertheless, that manuscript affords a strong<br />

presumption that this tradition is unfounded,— for although it<br />

details all the branches <strong>of</strong> the Macdonalds with great minute-<br />

ness and accuracy, and especially the descendants <strong>of</strong> the sons<br />

<strong>of</strong> Angus Mor, it does not include the Robertsons among them,<br />

and this presumption will appear the stronger when we consider<br />

not only the great extent <strong>of</strong> territory which this Duncan, as<br />

we shall afterwards see, possessed in the district <strong>of</strong> Atholl, but<br />

that the arms <strong>of</strong> the two families are quite different, and that<br />

they do not appear ever to have had any connection, as a clan,<br />

with the Macdonalds. <strong>The</strong>re is also another fact which renders<br />

it impossible that this Duncan could have been the son <strong>of</strong><br />

Angus <strong>of</strong> the Isles, and which consequently throws additional<br />

doubt upon the tradition, viz., that in several charters Duncan<br />

is designated " filius Andrece de Atholia,"^ and this designation<br />

''<br />

de At/iolia" continued in the family for several generations<br />

afterwards.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> peerage writers have been teenth century there is scarcely a<br />

more than usually inaccurate in their single step in the genealogy which<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the earldom <strong>of</strong> Atholl. is correctly given in the peerage.<br />

From its origin down to the four- 2 Eobertson's Index.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!