The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

clanstrachan.org
from clanstrachan.org More from this publisher
08.03.2013 Views

258 THE HIGHLANDERS [part ii give a title which was, in that age, territorial ?" and in this remark he has been followed by all subsequent historians. The following notices will shew, not only that there was such a title as abthane in Scotland, but even that that very title of Abthane of Dull existed to a late period, and consequently that Pinkerton, in denying its existence, only betrays his gross ignorance, and want of real research into the minuter parts of Scottish history :— Charter.— William the Lyon to the Bishop of Dunkeld, of terra de Abbethayn de ^ Kilntichael, in Strathardolf Charter.— Hugh, Bishop of Dunkeld, of reditu viginti solidorum deDull.2 qui nos et clericos nostros contingit de Abthania Charter.—William the Lion to Gilbert, Earl of Stratherne, of Madderty, and confirmation by Galfridus, Bishop of Dunkeld, of the said grant to the church of Madderty, et super terra qui AhtJien de Madderdj'n dicitur et super quieta clamatione de Can et Conneck qui clerici Dunkelden antiquitus ah eadetti Abthen perceperunt. 3 Charter by David H. to John Drummond, of the office of Baillierie, of the AbtJiain of Dull^ in Athol 4 ; and Charter by the same king to Donald Macnayre, Ester Fossache, in Abthania de Dull, in vie de Perth. 5 terre de These notices establish the existence of Abthanes and Abthainries in Scotland, and also of the particular Abthainry of Dull in Atholl. As it is very plain, however, that I^'ordun neither knew what it meant, nor of the existence of the Abthainrie of Dull, independent of Crinan, it appears evident that he must have drawn his information from some authentic document, for it is impossible to suppose that he would invent a title which he could not explain, or if he had been aware of the actual existence of the Abthainrie of Dull in after times, that he would have given the absurd explanation which he did. Crinan is the first person who can be traced of that race which to Scotland frvjm Duncan to Alexander gave so many kings ^ Chartulary of Dunfermline. * Robertson's Index. - Chartulary of St. Andrews. * Ibid. •" Chartulary of Inchaffray.

CHAP. V] O F S C O T L A N D 259 III. ; their origin is lost in obscurity, and if, as we conclude, the titles given to Crinan by Fordun are drawn from an authentic source, it becomes a matter of great interest and importance to trace the origin and signification of the title of xAbthane generally, and of that of Abthane of Dull in particular. The title of Abthane is peculiar to Scotland, and does not appear to have existed in any other country. It also appears to have been of but very rare occurrence even in Scotland, for I have been able to trace only three Abthainries in Scotland— viz., those of Dull, Kilmichael, and Madderty ; the two former in Atholl, and the latter in Stratherne. From this it is plain that it could not have been always a peculiar and distinctive title, but must merely be a modification of the title of Thane, circumstances. The name shews that it produced by peculiar must in its nature have been strictly analogous to the Thane, and for the same reason it must have taken its origin subsequent to the introduction of Thanes into Scotland. It would be needless here to controvert the idea formerly so prevalent in Scotland, that the Thanes were the ancient governors of the provinces, for it is now universally admitted that the Scottish Thane was the same title with the Saxon Thegn, or Thane, in England, and that it was introduced with the Saxon polity into Scotland ; but it will be necessary to advert to an erroneous •opinion first started by Chalmers in his Caledonia, and since adopted by many, that the Thane was merely a land steward or bailiff, and that the Abthane was just the abbot's steward, in the same way as the king's thane was the king's steward. With regard to the Abthane this is impossible, when we consider that although there were many abbots in Scotland who must have had their land stewards, yet there are but three instances of the title of Abthane connected with land in Scotland. His idea of the nature of ,the Thane is equally erroneous, for if the Scottish Thane was introduced by the Saxons, as Chalmers has succeeded in establishing, the characters of the offices must be the same ; and nothing is clearer than that the Saxon Thane was not a land steward, but the actual proprietor of a certain extent of land held directly of the crown, and that it was the title of a Saxon land proprietor exactly equivalent to the Norman baron. Of course, judging

CHAP. V] O F S C O T L A N D 259<br />

III. ; their origin is lost in obscurity, and if, as we conclude, the<br />

titles given to Crinan by<br />

Fordun are drawn from an authentic<br />

source, it becomes a matter <strong>of</strong> great interest and importance to<br />

trace the origin and signification<br />

<strong>of</strong> the title <strong>of</strong> xAbthane<br />

generally, and <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> Abthane <strong>of</strong> Dull in particular.<br />

<strong>The</strong> title <strong>of</strong> Abthane is peculiar to <strong>Scotland</strong>, and does not<br />

appear to have existed in any other country. It also appears to<br />

have been <strong>of</strong> but very rare occurrence even in <strong>Scotland</strong>, for I<br />

have been able to trace only three Abthainries in <strong>Scotland</strong>—<br />

viz., those <strong>of</strong> Dull, Kilmichael, and Madderty ; the two former<br />

in Atholl, and the latter in Stratherne. From this it is plain<br />

that it could not have been always a peculiar and distinctive<br />

title, but must merely be a modification <strong>of</strong> the title <strong>of</strong> Thane,<br />

circumstances. <strong>The</strong> name shews that it<br />

produced by peculiar<br />

must in its nature have been strictly analogous to the Thane,<br />

and for the same reason it must have taken its origin subsequent<br />

to the introduction <strong>of</strong> Thanes into <strong>Scotland</strong>. It would be<br />

needless here to controvert the idea formerly so prevalent in<br />

<strong>Scotland</strong>, that the Thanes were the ancient governors <strong>of</strong> the<br />

provinces, for it is now universally admitted that the Scottish<br />

Thane was the same title with the Saxon <strong>The</strong>gn, or Thane, in<br />

England, and that it was introduced with the Saxon polity into<br />

<strong>Scotland</strong> ; but it will be necessary to advert to an erroneous<br />

•opinion first started by Chalmers in his Caledonia, and since<br />

adopted by many, that the Thane was merely a land steward or<br />

bailiff, and that the Abthane was just the abbot's steward,<br />

in the same way as the king's thane was the king's steward.<br />

With regard to the Abthane this is impossible, when we<br />

consider that although there were many abbots in <strong>Scotland</strong><br />

who must have had their land stewards, yet there are<br />

but three instances <strong>of</strong> the title <strong>of</strong> Abthane connected with land<br />

in <strong>Scotland</strong>. His idea <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> ,the Thane is equally<br />

erroneous, for if the Scottish Thane was introduced by the<br />

Saxons, as Chalmers has succeeded in establishing, the characters<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fices must be the same ; and nothing is clearer<br />

than that the Saxon Thane was not a land steward, but the<br />

actual proprietor <strong>of</strong> a certain extent <strong>of</strong> land held directly <strong>of</strong><br />

the crown, and that it was the title <strong>of</strong> a Saxon land proprietor<br />

exactly equivalent to the Norman baron. Of course, judging

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!