The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society
The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society
238 THE HIGHLANDERS [part ii the issue of Godfrey in the person of his son Alexander, unquestionabh' devolved on the feudal representative of Reginald, the youngest son of that marriage. Of the descent of the clan Ranald, there is no doubt what- ever, nor has it ever been disputed, that they derive their origin from this Reginald or Ranald, a son of John, lord of the Isles, b\- Amy Mac Ror\\ Ranald obtained, as we have seen, from his father the lordship of Garmoran, which he held as vassal of his brother Godfrev, and these were the same terri- tories which the clan Ranald possessed, as appears from the parliamentary records in 1587, when mention is made of the " Clan Ranald of Knoydart, Mo}'dart, and Glengarry." There has, however, arisen considerable doubt which of the various families descended from Ranald anciently possessed the chief- ship, and without entering in this place into an argument of any great length on the subject, we shall state shortly the conclusions to which we have been led after a rigid examination of that question. That the present family styling themselves "of Clanranald'' v\-ere not the ancient chiefs there can be no doubt, as it is now a matter of evidence that the)' are descended from a bastard son of a second son of the old family of Moydart, who assumed the title of captain of Clanranald in 1531, and as long as the descendants of the elder brother remain they can have no claim by right of blood. The point we are to examine is, who was the chief previous to that assumption ? Ranald had five sons, of whom three only left issue, viz. : Donald, from whom descended the family of Knoydart and Glengarry ; .Allan, the ancestor of the famil}' of ^loydart ; and Angus, from whom came the famih- of Moror. That the descendants of Angus were the \-oungest branch, and could have no claim to the chiefship, has never been disputed, and the question accordingly lies between the descendants of Donald and of Allan. The seniority of Donald, however, is distinctly proved by the fact, that on the extinction of the family of ]\Ioror, the famih' of Moydart succeeded legalh- to that pro- perty ; consequently by the law of Scotland the\' must have been descended from a \'ounger son than the family of Kno}'dart and Glengarry, and it follows of necessit}' that the latter famil}'
CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 239 must have been that of the chief. Independently, however, of this argument, derived from the history of their properties, the same fact is evinced by the constant appearance of the latter family at the head of the clan previous to the usurpation of the family of Moydart ; thus when after Alexander, the lord of Garmoran, had been beheaded in 1427, and the lord of the Isles was soon after imprisoned, the whole clan rose in arms and revenged the death and imprisonment of their chiefs by the defeat of the king's army at Inverlochy in 1433, they were commanded by Donald the son of Ranald, for the oldest authorities term the Donald Balloch who led the clan on this occasion, the son of Alexander's uncle. The only other Donald who stood in this relation to Alexander was the son of John Mor, of Isla ; but the same authorities state that the Donald Balloch of Inv-er- lochy was betrayed and slain but a very few years afterwards, while the Donald the son of John Mor was unquestionably alive in 1462. The Donald Balloch of Inverlochy must, therefore, have been Donald the son of Ranald, and unless he was the chief of the clan Ranald it is difficult to suppose that he would have been placed in command of the whole clan, while the natural inference from the transaction is, that the clan turned themselves to Donald as the person who had the best right to lead them. Donald had three sons, John, Alaster, and Angus. ^ On the forfeiture of Alexander Mac Gorry of Garmoran in 1427, that part of Lochaber possessed by him was granted to the Earl of Marr, while all those lands held of him by the clan Ranald remained in the crown, and consequently the chief of clan Ranald must have held them as crown vassal. ^ Accordingly we find John, the eldest son of Donald, holding his lands of the crown, as appears from a gift of the nonentries of Knoydart to Cameron since the decease of umq'i John 'MS. of 1450. charter to the ancestor of tlie Mac- neills, dated in 1427, of the island of «Not only did the chief of clan Barra, and of the lands of Boysdale in Ranald hold these lands of the crown, ^j^^ -^^^^^ ^^ Uist,both of whicli islands as he had previously held them of are included in Reginald's charter, and Alexander Mac Gorry, but it actually ^^^ ^j ^^^-^^^ ^^,^^^ ^^ ^.^ j^^^.^ g^^j,^ appears that the Lord of the Isles was certainly held in chief of the crown his vassal in some of them, for Alex- ^^ ^^^ j^gj^ ^^ ^1,^ ^^.^^ marriage, ander. Lord of the Isles, grants a •
- Page 221 and 222: CHAP 1] OF SCOTLAND 187 This remark
- Page 223 and 224: CHAP I] OFSCOTLAND 189 III. Descend
- Page 225 and 226: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 191 as Argyll
- Page 227 and 228: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 193 of their
- Page 229 and 230: CHAP II] OF SCOTLAND 195 the previo
- Page 231 and 232: CHAP II] OF SCOTLAND 197 some degre
- Page 233 and 234: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 199 earlier p
- Page 235 and 236: CHAP. II] O F S C O T L A N D 201 S
- Page 237 and 238: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 203 Somerled,
- Page 239 and 240: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 205 The remai
- Page 241 and 242: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 207 greater e
- Page 243 and 244: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 209 with Regi
- Page 245 and 246: CHAP. Ill] OF SCOTLAND 211 CHAPTER
- Page 247 and 248: CHAP. Ill] OF SCOTLAND 213 As Angus
- Page 249 and 250: CHAP. Ill] OF SCOTLAND 215 been ent
- Page 251 and 252: CHAP III] OF SCOTLAND 217 danger of
- Page 253 and 254: CHAP. Ill] OF SCOTLAND 219 principa
- Page 255 and 256: CiiAK III] OF SCOTLAND 221 which ha
- Page 257 and 258: CHAr. Ill] OFSCOTLAND 223 they had
- Page 259 and 260: CHAP. Ill] OF SCOTLAND 225 by the o
- Page 261 and 262: CHAP. Ill] OF SCOTLAND 227 to have
- Page 263 and 264: CHAP. Ill] OF SCOTLAND 229 Mingarry
- Page 265 and 266: CHAP. Ill] OF SCOTLAND 231 the gove
- Page 267 and 268: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 233 peace wit
- Page 269 and 270: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 235 the secre
- Page 271: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 237 " " Domin
- Page 275 and 276: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 241 respectiv
- Page 277 and 278: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 243 expressly
- Page 279 and 280: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 245 Bannockbu
- Page 281 and 282: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 247 Siol Gill
- Page 283 and 284: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 249 after thi
- Page 285 and 286: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 251 history o
- Page 287 and 288: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 253 the first
- Page 289 and 290: CHAP. IV] OF SCOTLAND 255 soon redu
- Page 291 and 292: CHAP. V] OF SCOTLAND 257 Norwegians
- Page 293 and 294: CHAP. V] O F S C O T L A N D 259 II
- Page 295 and 296: CHAP. V] O F S C O T L A N D 261 in
- Page 297 and 298: CHAP. V] OF SCOTLAND 263 by the nam
- Page 299 and 300: CHAP. V] OF SCOTLAND 265 The real d
- Page 301 and 302: CHAP. V] O F S C O T L A N D 267 ca
- Page 303 and 304: CHAP. V] O F S C O T L A N D 269 th
- Page 305 and 306: CHAP. V] OF SCOTLAND 271 be doubted
- Page 307 and 308: CHAP. V] OF SCOTLAND 273 with the c
- Page 309 and 310: CHAP. V] OF SCOTLAND 275 by Duncan,
- Page 311 and 312: CHAP. V] O F S C O T L A N D 277 po
- Page 313 and 314: CHAP. VI] O F S C O T L A N D 279 l
- Page 315 and 316: CHAP. VI] OF SCOTLAND 281 pared to
- Page 317 and 318: CHAP. VI] O F S C O T L A N D 283 A
- Page 319 and 320: CHAP. VI] OF SCOTLAND 285 Chattan.
- Page 321 and 322: CHAP. VI] OF SCOTLAND 287 that thes
238 THE HIGHLANDERS [part ii<br />
the issue <strong>of</strong> Godfrey in the person <strong>of</strong> his son Alexander, unquestionabh'<br />
devolved on the feudal representative <strong>of</strong> Reginald, the<br />
youngest son <strong>of</strong> that marriage.<br />
Of the descent <strong>of</strong> the clan Ranald, there is no doubt what-<br />
ever, nor has it ever been disputed, that they derive their<br />
origin from this Reginald or Ranald, a son <strong>of</strong> John, lord <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Isles, b\- Amy Mac Ror\\ Ranald obtained, as we have seen,<br />
from his father the lordship <strong>of</strong> Garmoran, which he held as<br />
vassal <strong>of</strong> his brother Godfrev, and these were the same terri-<br />
tories which the clan Ranald possessed, as appears from the<br />
parliamentary records in 1587, when mention is made <strong>of</strong> the<br />
" <strong>Clan</strong> Ranald <strong>of</strong> Knoydart, Mo}'dart, and Glengarry." <strong>The</strong>re<br />
has, however,<br />
arisen considerable doubt which <strong>of</strong> the various<br />
families descended from Ranald anciently possessed the chief-<br />
ship, and without entering in this place into an argument <strong>of</strong><br />
any great length on the subject, we shall state shortly the<br />
conclusions to which we have been led after a rigid examination<br />
<strong>of</strong> that question.<br />
That the present family styling themselves "<strong>of</strong> <strong>Clan</strong>ranald''<br />
v\-ere not the ancient chiefs there can be no doubt, as it is<br />
now a matter <strong>of</strong> evidence that the)' are descended from a<br />
bastard son <strong>of</strong> a second son <strong>of</strong> the old family <strong>of</strong> Moydart,<br />
who assumed the title <strong>of</strong> captain <strong>of</strong> <strong>Clan</strong>ranald in 1531, and<br />
as long as the descendants <strong>of</strong> the elder brother remain they<br />
can have no claim by right <strong>of</strong> blood. <strong>The</strong> point we are to<br />
examine is, who was the chief previous to that assumption ?<br />
Ranald had five sons, <strong>of</strong> whom three only left issue, viz. :<br />
Donald, from whom descended the family <strong>of</strong> Knoydart and<br />
Glengarry ; .Allan, the ancestor <strong>of</strong> the famil}' <strong>of</strong> ^loydart ; and<br />
Angus, from whom came the famih- <strong>of</strong> Moror. That the<br />
descendants <strong>of</strong> Angus were the \-oungest branch, and could<br />
have no claim to the chiefship, has never been disputed, and<br />
the question accordingly lies between the descendants <strong>of</strong> Donald<br />
and <strong>of</strong> Allan. <strong>The</strong> seniority <strong>of</strong> Donald, however, is distinctly<br />
proved by the fact, that on the extinction <strong>of</strong> the family <strong>of</strong><br />
]\Ioror, the famih' <strong>of</strong> Moydart succeeded legalh- to that pro-<br />
perty ; consequently by the law <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> the\' must have<br />
been descended from a \'ounger son than the family <strong>of</strong> Kno}'dart<br />
and Glengarry, and it follows <strong>of</strong> necessit}' that the latter famil}'