The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society
The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society
158 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti Scottish conquest down to the thirteenth century, they frequently notice the existence o^ pjwinces in the north of Scotland. The oldest description of these territorial divisions which we possess, is contained in the work of Giraldus Cambrensis, styled " De Situ Albaniae," and written in the year 1180. He mentions that the " Aqua optima, quae Scottice vocata est Forth," divides the " regna Scottorum et Anglorum," and says, " Hasc vero terra a septem fratribus divisa fuit antiquitus in septem partes : quarum pars principalis est Enegus cum Moerne, ab Enegus fratrum sic nominata secunda autem pars est : primogenito AdtJicodle et Gouerin^ : pars etiam tertia est Stradeern cum Meneted : quarta pars partium est Fife cum Fothreve : quinta vero pars est Marr cum BucJien : sexta autem est Miirref et Ros : septima enim pars est CatJianesia citra montem et ultra montem : quia Mons Mound dividit Cathatiesiavi per medium."^ He afterwards gives a different account of the seven provinces, on the authority of Andrew, Bishop of Caithness :— "Primum regnum fuit (sicut mihi verus relator retulit, Andreas, videlicet, vir venerabilis Katanensis episcopus nacione Scottus et Dunfermlis Monachus) ab ilia aqua optima, quae Scottice vocata est Forth, Britannice Werid, Romane vero Scotte-Wattre, i.e., aqua Scottorum ; quae regna Scottorum et Anglorum dividit, et currit juxta oppidum de Strivelin, usque ad flumen aliud nobile, quod vocatum est Tae. " Secundum regnum ad Hilef, sicut mare circuit, usque ad montem aquilonali plaga de Strivelin qui vocatur Athrin. " Tertium regnum ab Hi/ef usque ad Z^e. " Ouartum regnum ex F>e usque ad magnum et mirabile et meliorem totius Scociae. flumen quod vocatur Spe, majorem '• Ouintum regnum de S^e usque ad montem Bruinalban. " Sextum regnum fuit Muref et Ros. " Septimum regnum fuit Arregaithel." On comparing these two lists, it will be observed that six 'The word read by Inues Gouerin, Atlioll and Gowry being in the same ought undoubtedly to be Garorin or territorial division. Innes probably Garmorin, for the division of the Picts never heard of the Earldom of Garinto the two nations of Australes et moriu, Septentrionales, and the language of Bede, precludes the possibility of £. Innes, App. No. 1.
APPEND.] OF SCOTLAND 159 of the seven provinces are the same in both ; the first province in the second list being equivalent to Fife and Fothreve ; the second, to Stratherne and Menteth ; the third, to Angus and Merns ; the fourth, to Marr and Buchan ; the fifth, to Atholl ; and the sixth, Moray and Ross ; while in the first list, the seventh is Cathanesia, and in the second it is Argyll. This variation, it is plain, could not arise from any error in the ancient documents from which these two accounts are taken ; and the two lists can only represent the division of Scotland into seven provinces, at different periods, since otherwise we could not account for the omission of either Argyll or Caithness This variation, however, points out distinctly the different periods in the history of Scotland to which the two lists apply. The first list omits Argyll ; the second includes Argyll and omits Caithness ; and the ninth century produced exactly the changes in the history of Scotland which would account for this varia- tion ; for the Scottish conquest, in 843, added Dalriada, which afterwards became Argyll, to the rest of Scotland, and towards the end of the same century, Caithness fell into the hands of the Norwegians. The second list thus exhibits the exact territories possessed by the king of Scotland subsequent to the ninth century, while the first list gives an equally faithful picture of the extent of the Pictish kingdom previous to the Scottish conquest. This is very plain, when we find that the seven provinces in the first list form exactly the possessions of the Picts, and that the part omitted is just the territory of the Dalriads ; and this is most important, for it proves that the division into seven provinces was peculiar to the Picts, and that the Pictish kingdom formed the basis of the subsequent Scottish monarchy. Having thus established the fact that the seven provinces contained in the first list were the territorial divisions of the Pictish kingdom previous to the Scottish conquest, we now proceed to enquire into the nature and purpose of this division. Giraldus mentions a tradition that the seven provinces arose from a division of the territory of the Picts among seven brothers. These seven brothers, however, are manifestly the same with the seven sons of Cruthne, the progenitor of the Picts mentioned in the following passage of the Pictish chronicle:
- Page 142 and 143: io8 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti famih- o
- Page 144 and 145: no THE HIGHLANDERS [parti the}- wer
- Page 146 and 147: 112 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti bound to
- Page 148 and 149: 114 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i After t
- Page 150 and 151: ii6 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti when it
- Page 152 and 153: ii8 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti CHAPTER
- Page 154 and 155: I20 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti counterp
- Page 156 and 157: 122 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i termed
- Page 158 and 159: 124 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti uses. Bu
- Page 160 and 161: 126 T II E H I G H LANDERS [part I
- Page 162 and 163: 128 THE HIGHLANDERS [part I had bee
- Page 164 and 165: 130 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i essenti
- Page 166 and 167: 132 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti The exac
- Page 168 and 169: 134 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i hyperbo
- Page 170 and 171: 136 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i The pro
- Page 172 and 173: 138 T H E H I G H L A N D E R S [pa
- Page 174 and 175: 140 THE HIGHLANDERS [paPxT i Where
- Page 176 and 177: 142 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i CHAPTER
- Page 178 and 179: 144 THE HIGHLANDERS [part r flowing
- Page 180 and 181: 146 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti Wallace,
- Page 182 and 183: 148 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti pretendi
- Page 184 and 185: 150 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i " Item,
- Page 186 and 187: 152 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i and thi
- Page 188 and 189: 154 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti proof of
- Page 190 and 191: 156 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i accused
- Page 194 and 195: i6o THE HIGHLANDERS [parti " Cruidn
- Page 196 and 197: i62 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti In the B
- Page 198 and 199: 164 THE HIGHLANDERS [part I fourtee
- Page 200 and 201: i66 THE HIGHLANDERS [PART i previou
- Page 202 and 203: i68 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti We shall
- Page 204: I70 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i postmod
- Page 209 and 210: THE HIGHLAND CLANS. CHAPTER I. Trad
- Page 211 and 212: CHAP. I] OF SCOTLAND 177 Scandinavi
- Page 213 and 214: CHAP. I] OF SCOTLAND 179 tribes of
- Page 215 and 216: CHAP I] OF SCOTLAND i8i gave his na
- Page 217 and 218: CHAP. I] OFSCOTLAND 183 origin to b
- Page 219 and 220: CiiAi'. I] OFSCOTLAND 185 kynge, na
- Page 221 and 222: CHAP 1] OF SCOTLAND 187 This remark
- Page 223 and 224: CHAP I] OFSCOTLAND 189 III. Descend
- Page 225 and 226: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 191 as Argyll
- Page 227 and 228: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 193 of their
- Page 229 and 230: CHAP II] OF SCOTLAND 195 the previo
- Page 231 and 232: CHAP II] OF SCOTLAND 197 some degre
- Page 233 and 234: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 199 earlier p
- Page 235 and 236: CHAP. II] O F S C O T L A N D 201 S
- Page 237 and 238: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 203 Somerled,
- Page 239 and 240: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 205 The remai
- Page 241 and 242: CHAP. II] OF SCOTLAND 207 greater e
APPEND.] OF SCOTLAND 159<br />
<strong>of</strong> the seven provinces are the same in both ; the first province<br />
in the second list being equivalent to Fife and Fothreve ; the<br />
second, to Stratherne and Menteth ; the third, to Angus and<br />
Merns ; the fourth, to Marr and Buchan ; the fifth, to Atholl ;<br />
and the sixth, Moray and Ross ; while in the first list, the<br />
seventh is Cathanesia, and in the second it is Argyll.<br />
This variation, it is plain, could not arise from any error in<br />
the ancient documents from which these two accounts are taken ;<br />
and the two lists can only represent the division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong><br />
into seven provinces, at different periods, since otherwise we<br />
could not account for the omission <strong>of</strong> either Argyll or Caithness<br />
This variation, however, points out distinctly the different periods<br />
in the history <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> to which the two lists apply. <strong>The</strong><br />
first list omits Argyll ; the second includes Argyll and omits<br />
Caithness ; and the ninth century produced exactly the changes<br />
in the history <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> which would account for this varia-<br />
tion ; for the Scottish conquest, in 843, added Dalriada, which<br />
afterwards became Argyll, to the rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>, and towards<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the same century, Caithness fell into the hands<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Norwegians. <strong>The</strong> second list thus exhibits the exact<br />
territories possessed by the king <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> subsequent to<br />
the ninth century, while the first list gives an equally faithful<br />
picture <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> the Pictish kingdom previous to the<br />
Scottish conquest. This is very plain, when we find that the<br />
seven provinces in the first list form exactly the possessions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Picts, and that the part omitted is just the territory<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Dalriads ; and this is most important, for it proves that<br />
the division into seven provinces was peculiar to the Picts, and<br />
that the Pictish kingdom formed the basis <strong>of</strong> the subsequent<br />
Scottish monarchy. Having thus established the fact that the<br />
seven provinces contained in the first list were the territorial<br />
divisions <strong>of</strong> the Pictish kingdom previous to the Scottish<br />
conquest, we now proceed to enquire into the nature and<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> this division.<br />
Giraldus mentions a tradition that the seven provinces arose<br />
from a division <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> the Picts among seven<br />
brothers. <strong>The</strong>se seven brothers, however, are manifestly the<br />
same with the seven sons <strong>of</strong> Cruthne, the progenitor <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Picts mentioned in the following passage <strong>of</strong> the Pictish chronicle: