The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society
The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society
I20 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti counterpart to a modern system of church government, con- fessed!}' formed upon no ancient model, and the invention of the sixteenth century. Each party has unfortunately been more anxious to prove its resemblance to their own cherished system of church government than to ascertain its actual constitution. They have eagerly seized hold of every circumstance which appeared to favour their hypothesis, and attempted to neutralise and explain away whatever was adverse to their system ; but until we find it impossible, from an impartial examination of all the scattered notices of the history of the Culdee church which have come down to us, to extract a consistent form of church government, although that form ma}' have been a peculiar one,, we are not entitled to assume, a priori, that the form of the Culdee church must have been the same with some known form of church government, and in consequence to disregard an}embarrassing notice, however trivial. The obscurity which attends this subject has arisen from various causes. We cannot expect to find in the older writers much information regarding the internal history of the country, because, while they anxiously recorded the principal events of its external history, there was nothing in its manners and form of societ}' to strike them as peculiar or worthy of commemoration. With regard to the Christian church established in the country the case is different, for when we consider that at that period all Christian churches possessed essentially the same form of government, and that a form believed to be of apostolic institution, we may well suppose that if the Culdee church differed essentially from other churches in an}' important particular, that that circumstance would be if we find carefully recorded by ever}- ecclesiastical writer ; and that ecclesiastical writers do impute peculiarities to that church, we ma}- safel}- conclude that, with the exception of the differ- ences of form mentioned by these writers, it must in all other respects have been similar to other Christian societies throughout the world. Modern writers have added much to the difficulty of the question by overlooking the fact, that the Culdee church of Scotland was the offspring of the church founded in Ireland a century before by St. Patrick, and by persisting in viewing the Culdee church as it existed in Scotland unconnected with its mother church, although it formed an essential part of that
CHAP. VIII] OF SCOTLAND 121 church for many centuries after its foundation by Columba ; but the difficulty has been increased still more by not distinguishing between the different churches which existed at the same time in Ireland and in Britain. During the occupation of Britain by the Romans, that island was inhabited by two races— the Britons and the Picts, and the latter were divided into two nations of the southern and northern Picts ; Ireland at the same period was also inhabited by two races—the Scots, who possessed the south and west, and the Cruithne, or Irish Picts, who inhabited the north and east.^ In the fourth century the Scots brought the whole island under subjection, and after that period, while their name extended over the whole of Ireland, we find the two races distinguished by the titles of the Southern Scots and Northern Scots. The Britons were the first of these different races who became Christian, and after them the Scots, both having been apparently converted to Christianity before the departure of the Romans from the island. After that event we find, in A.D. 431, Palladius sent from Rome as Primus Episcopus^ to the " Scotos in Christiun Credentes" and in the following year Patrick made his mission to Ireland. It would be unnecessary here to refute the absurd idea formerly held, that the Scots to whom Palladius was sent were the Scots of Britain, as there is no point which has been so clearly estab- lished as the fact that his mission was to Ireland ; but historians have been much puzzled to reconcile the mission of Palladius with that of Patrick. Patrick unquestionably converted his Scots from Paganism, and that for the first time ; Palladius, it is equally certain, was sent but one year before to Scots already Christian. Many attempts have been made to account for this, all of which are equally unsatisfactory. But when we find, on examining the best authorities, that Saint Patrick in fact converted the people of the north of Ireland only, that he founded his archiepiscopal seat at Armagh in Ulster, and that the jurisdiction of that primate never extended beyond that part of the island, the inhabitants of which were See infra. copus." It most certainly signified * Much confusion has arisen among first bishop, in respect of dignity, or our historians by mistaking the mean- primate, not first bishop in order of ing of the expression " Primus Epis- time.
- Page 104 and 105: 70 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti although,
- Page 106 and 107: 72 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i the terr
- Page 108 and 109: 74 THE HIGHLANDERS [paPxT r men and
- Page 110 and 111: 76 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i any resi
- Page 112 and 113: ;8 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i English,
- Page 114 and 115: So T in=: HIGHLANDERS [part i to ru
- Page 116 and 117: 82 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i had prob
- Page 118 and 119: 84 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i Bane and
- Page 120 and 121: 86 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i of David
- Page 122 and 123: 88 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i In the m
- Page 124 and 125: 90 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i therefor
- Page 126 and 127: 92 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i which at
- Page 128 and 129: 94 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i Montrose
- Page 130 and 131: 96 'the HIGHLANDERS [part i smartin
- Page 132 and 133: 98 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i great, a
- Page 134 and 135: loo THE HIGHLANDERS [part i of thei
- Page 136 and 137: I02 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i possess
- Page 138 and 139: I04 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti successi
- Page 140 and 141: io6 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti the aige
- Page 142 and 143: io8 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti famih- o
- Page 144 and 145: no THE HIGHLANDERS [parti the}- wer
- Page 146 and 147: 112 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti bound to
- Page 148 and 149: 114 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i After t
- Page 150 and 151: ii6 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti when it
- Page 152 and 153: ii8 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti CHAPTER
- Page 156 and 157: 122 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i termed
- Page 158 and 159: 124 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti uses. Bu
- Page 160 and 161: 126 T II E H I G H LANDERS [part I
- Page 162 and 163: 128 THE HIGHLANDERS [part I had bee
- Page 164 and 165: 130 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i essenti
- Page 166 and 167: 132 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti The exac
- Page 168 and 169: 134 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i hyperbo
- Page 170 and 171: 136 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i The pro
- Page 172 and 173: 138 T H E H I G H L A N D E R S [pa
- Page 174 and 175: 140 THE HIGHLANDERS [paPxT i Where
- Page 176 and 177: 142 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i CHAPTER
- Page 178 and 179: 144 THE HIGHLANDERS [part r flowing
- Page 180 and 181: 146 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti Wallace,
- Page 182 and 183: 148 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti pretendi
- Page 184 and 185: 150 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i " Item,
- Page 186 and 187: 152 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i and thi
- Page 188 and 189: 154 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti proof of
- Page 190 and 191: 156 THE HIGHLANDERS [part i accused
- Page 192 and 193: 158 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti Scottish
- Page 194 and 195: i6o THE HIGHLANDERS [parti " Cruidn
- Page 196 and 197: i62 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti In the B
- Page 198 and 199: 164 THE HIGHLANDERS [part I fourtee
- Page 200 and 201: i66 THE HIGHLANDERS [PART i previou
- Page 202 and 203: i68 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti We shall
I20 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti<br />
counterpart to a modern system <strong>of</strong> church government, con-<br />
fessed!}' formed upon no ancient model, and the invention <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sixteenth century. Each party has unfortunately been more<br />
anxious to prove its resemblance to their own cherished system<br />
<strong>of</strong> church government than to ascertain its actual constitution.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y have eagerly seized hold <strong>of</strong> every circumstance which<br />
appeared to favour their hypothesis, and attempted to neutralise<br />
and explain away whatever was adverse to their system ; but<br />
until we find it impossible, from an impartial examination <strong>of</strong> all<br />
the scattered notices <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> the Culdee church which<br />
have come down to us, to extract a consistent form <strong>of</strong> church<br />
government, although that form ma}' have been a peculiar one,,<br />
we are not entitled to assume, a priori, that the form <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Culdee church must have been the same with some known form<br />
<strong>of</strong> church government, and in consequence to disregard an}embarrassing<br />
notice, however trivial. <strong>The</strong> obscurity which<br />
attends this subject has arisen from various causes. We cannot<br />
expect to find in the older writers much information regarding<br />
the internal history <strong>of</strong> the country, because, while they anxiously<br />
recorded the principal events <strong>of</strong> its external history, there was<br />
nothing in its manners and form <strong>of</strong> societ}' to strike them as<br />
peculiar or worthy <strong>of</strong> commemoration. With regard to the<br />
Christian church established in the country the case is different,<br />
for when we consider that at that period all Christian churches<br />
possessed essentially the same form <strong>of</strong> government, and that a<br />
form believed to be <strong>of</strong> apostolic institution, we may well suppose<br />
that if the Culdee church differed essentially from other churches<br />
in an}' important particular, that that circumstance would be<br />
if we find<br />
carefully recorded by ever}- ecclesiastical writer ; and<br />
that ecclesiastical writers do impute peculiarities to that church,<br />
we ma}- safel}- conclude that, with the exception <strong>of</strong> the differ-<br />
ences <strong>of</strong> form mentioned by these writers,<br />
it must in all other<br />
respects have been similar to other Christian societies throughout<br />
the world. Modern writers have added much to the difficulty <strong>of</strong><br />
the question by overlooking the fact, that the Culdee church <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Scotland</strong> was the <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> the church founded in Ireland a<br />
century before by St. Patrick, and by persisting in viewing the<br />
Culdee church as it existed in <strong>Scotland</strong> unconnected with its<br />
mother church, although it formed an essential part <strong>of</strong> that