Mircea Eliade YOGA IMMORTALITY AND ... - Brihaspati.net

Mircea Eliade YOGA IMMORTALITY AND ... - Brihaspati.net Mircea Eliade YOGA IMMORTALITY AND ... - Brihaspati.net

brihaspati.net
from brihaspati.net More from this publisher
08.03.2013 Views

Krisna hastens to uncover the deeper meaning of this activity: "If I were not always active in-fatigue, the men would follow my example everywhere. The world would not exist if I do my work, I would cause universal confusion and the end of creatures "(III, 23-24, trans. E. Senart). Accordingly, Arjuna should mimic the behavior of Krishna: that is, first, continue the action, not to contribute, by their passivity, the "universal confusion. But to act "as Krishna," I need to understand both the essence of divinity and its modes of manifestation. That is why Krishna is revealed: to know God, man knows at once the role model. However, Krishna begins to reveal that Being and Non-Being and dwell in the whole Creation "from the gods to minerals-down of the (VII, 4-6; IX, 4-5, etc.). . The continuously creates the world through its prakrti (IX, 8) but this incessant activity does not chained (IX, 9), is only the spectator of his own creation (IX, 10). It is this valuation, seemingly paradoxical, the activity (of karma), which is the capital of Yoga lection revealed by Krishna, in imitation of God who creates and sustains the world without participating in, the man will learn to do the same. "It is not enough to refrain from the action to liberate the act, the mere inaction does not lead to perfection" because "everyone is doomed to action" For more than men restrain the activity of their senses, "him whose soul is disturbed by the evocation of sensible objects "-that is most human beings-not enough to uproot the world. Even if you abstain from, in the strict sense of the word, all unconscious activity, caused by guna (III, 5) continuously chained to the world and assimilated to karmic circuit. Sentenced to action-for Ta action is superior to inaction "(III, 8)-a man must meet prescribed acts, in other words the" duties ", acts which it is committed under its particular situation. "Better to meet, albeit imperfectly, his own duty (svadharma), which meet perfectly even, the corresponding duty to another condition" (para-dharma: III, 35). These specific activities are conditioned by the guna ( XVII, 8, XVIII, 23). Krisna repeated several times that the guna come from him, but not locking, "not that I would be in them, they who are in my" (VII, 12; XIV, 5 concerning the structure of the guna). "I created the division into four classes that distinguishes guna (...) and yet not ac-tuo, irimutable am" (IV, 3). lection that emerges from this is: even accepting the "historico situation" created by the guna (which must be accepted as it guna also the result of Krishna) and acting according to the needs of this "situation", the man must refuse to enhance their actions and in consequence, refuse to grant an absolute value to their own condition. In other words, first you must deny any ontological reality "situation" human (because only Krishna is saturated with Ser) and on the other hand, must take care to enjoy the "fruits of their actions." "ACTS AND SACRIFICE" In this sense we can say that strives to "save" all human acts, for "justification" for every action profane: because by the very fact that he no longer enjoys its "fruits", the man transforms his acts in the sacrifice, ie we transpersonal dynamism that contribute the maintenance of cosmic order. However, as Krishna remembers, only acts whose immediate purpose is not chained sacrifice, "but do not react because I apartoda Prajapati sacrifice for the Cosmos could manifest itself and that humans can live and breed (III, 10). But Krishna reveals that man can also cooperate in the perpetuation of God's work: not only by

sacrifice themselves (which constitute the cul-to Vedic), but through all his actions, whatever their nature. For one who "is devoted to works of sacrifice, all activity is dissolved into nothingness" (IV, 23). It is assumed that the activity is not "strings", and not creating new karmic cores. It is in this sense that the various ascetics and yogis "sacrifice" their physiological and psychological activities, they emerge from these activities, gives them a transpersonal value and in doing so "have all the true notion of sacrifice, by slaughtering , cleared his spots "(IV, 25-30). This transmutation of secular ritual activities is made possible thanks to Yoga. Krishna reveals to Arjuna that "man of action" may be saved, in other words, escape the consequences of their participation in the life of the world, while continuing his accidn. The "man of action", ie that ro can be removed from civilian life to achieve their salvation through knowledge or mystic devotion. The only thing that must be met is this: you must give up their acts and restdtados of these, in other words, "deprived of the fruits of their actions" (phahrtrsnavairagya) act in an impersonal way, without passion, without desire, as if were a procuration, instead. If acts under this rule, strictly, his actions are no longer generating new karmic potential, or to tie him to the circuit and karmic. "Regardless of the result of the action, always happy, free from any bond, to tie this in fact does not act ... (IV, 20). The great originality of the Bhagavad-Gita lies in having INSIS-ed on this "Yoga of Action" that is made "renouncing the fruits of their own actions" (phalatrsnavairagya). This is the main reason for his success, unprecedented in the India. Because from that mo-ment, men can have hope of salvation, thanks to phalatrsnavairagya, although for various reasons, from being obli-gado to retain shared social life, having a family, preoccupations, perform duties, and even do immoral things (like Arjuna, to be killed during the war to their opponents). Acting placid, automatically, without being moved by the "desire of fruit "is to obtain a self-control and serenity that no doubt only the Yoga can confer. As Krishna says:" Ac-was being carried out without restrictions, remains faithful to Yoga. "Esia interpretation of the Yoga-technique in the which makes us see a tool that enables us to extricate ourselves from the world, still living and acting in the-is characteristic of the great effort of synthesis of the author of the Bhagavad-Gita, who wanted to reconcile all vocations (ascetic, mystic, active) as he had already reconciled the Vedantic monism to pluralism Samkhya, but at the same time highlights the extreme flexibility of Yoga, thus proving once more that can adapt to all religious experiences and to satisfy all needs. YOGA TECHNIQUE the Bhagavad-gita . The rest of this "Yoga" accessible to everyone and that is the renunciation of "the fruits of acts", the Bhagavad-Gita explained in brief as a technique itself Yogi, reserve for municipal vada ( VI, 11). Although morphologically (postures of the body, fixing the tip of the nose, etc.). This technique is ana-loga to that described by Patanjali, meditation is that Krishna speaks differently from the Yoga-Sutra. First, pranayama is not mentioned in that context. The Gita IV, 29 V, 27, refers to pranayama, but more than an exercise yogi, it is a meditation of substitution, a "ritual internalized" as those who are to be found in the epoch of the Brahmana and the Upanishad. Second, in yogic meditation Citation does not reach its peak only when the Yogi concentrates on Krishna.

sacrifice themselves (which constitute the cul-to Vedic), but through all his actions,<br />

whatever their nature. For one who "is devoted to works of sacrifice, all activity is<br />

dissolved into nothingness" (IV, 23). It is assumed that the activity is not "strings", and<br />

not creating new karmic cores. It is in this sense that the various ascetics and yogis<br />

"sacrifice" their physiological and psychological activities, they emerge from these activities,<br />

gives them a transpersonal value and in doing so "have all the true notion of<br />

sacrifice, by slaughtering , cleared his spots "(IV, 25-30).<br />

This transmutation of secular ritual activities is made possible thanks to Yoga. Krishna<br />

reveals to Arjuna that "man of action" may be saved, in other words, escape the<br />

consequences of their participation in the life of the world, while continuing his accidn.<br />

The "man of action", ie that ro can be removed from civilian life to achieve their<br />

salvation through knowledge or mystic devotion. The only thing that must be met is this:<br />

you must give up their acts and restdtados of these, in other words, "deprived of the fruits<br />

of their actions" (phahrtrsnavairagya) act in an impersonal way, without passion, without<br />

desire, as if were a procuration, instead. If acts under this rule, strictly, his actions are no<br />

longer generating new karmic potential, or to tie him to the circuit and karmic.<br />

"Regardless of the result of the action, always happy, free from any bond, to tie this in<br />

fact does not act ... (IV, 20).<br />

The great originality of the Bhagavad-Gita lies in having INSIS-ed on this "Yoga of<br />

Action" that is made "renouncing the fruits of their own actions" (phalatrsnavairagya).<br />

This is the main reason for his success, unprecedented in the India. Because from that<br />

mo-ment, men can have hope of salvation, thanks to phalatrsnavairagya, although for<br />

various reasons, from being obli-gado to retain shared social life, having a family,<br />

preoccupations, perform duties, and even do immoral things (like Arjuna, to be killed<br />

during the war to their opponents). Acting placid, automatically, without being moved by<br />

the "desire of<br />

fruit "is to obtain a self-control and serenity that no doubt only the Yoga can confer. As<br />

Krishna says:" Ac-was being carried out without restrictions, remains faithful to Yoga.<br />

"Esia interpretation of the Yoga-technique in the which makes us see a tool that enables<br />

us to extricate ourselves from the world, still living and acting in the-is characteristic of<br />

the great effort of synthesis of the author of the Bhagavad-Gita, who wanted to reconcile<br />

all vocations (ascetic, mystic, active) as he had already reconciled the Vedantic monism<br />

to pluralism Samkhya, but at the same time highlights the extreme flexibility of Yoga,<br />

thus proving once more that can adapt to all religious experiences and to satisfy all needs.<br />

<strong>YOGA</strong> TECHNIQUE the Bhagavad-gita<br />

. The rest of this "Yoga" accessible to everyone and that is the renunciation of "the fruits<br />

of acts", the Bhagavad-Gita explained in brief as a technique itself Yogi, reserve for<br />

municipal vada ( VI, 11). Although morphologically (postures of the body, fixing the tip<br />

of the nose, etc.). This technique is ana-loga to that described by Patanjali, meditation is<br />

that Krishna speaks differently from the Yoga-Sutra. First, pranayama is not mentioned in<br />

that context. The Gita IV, 29 V, 27, refers to pranayama, but more than an exercise yogi,<br />

it is a meditation of substitution, a "ritual internalized" as those who are to be found in the<br />

epoch of the Brahmana and the Upanishad. Second, in yogic meditation Citation does not<br />

reach its peak only when the Yogi concentrates on Krishna.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!