Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ... Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

ansci.wisc.edu
from ansci.wisc.edu More from this publisher
07.03.2013 Views

Dairy Sheep Genetics Any ewe can be milked, however, there are significant differences in personality, letdown, udder conformation, lactation length, and other factors that impact sheep dairy profitability. We have chosen to select for a combination of milk components and production, as well as conformation. In 1998, we culled our ewe flock heavily based on udder conformation and milking “attitude”. Each ewe’s udder was rated on a 1-5 scale based on teat placement, strength of fore and rear udder attachment, tightness of fit, “meatiness” and willingness to “let-down” with minimal manipulation. In 2000 we began unofficial DHI testing through AgSource Cooperative Services. They provide calibrated meters each month that allows us to estimate the production of each ewe in the milking flock. In addition, we receive a monthly status report for each ewe on pounds of milk produced, percent and pounds of butterfat and protein, and somatic cell counts. Using a combination of the age-factor production factors noted by David Thomas 1 , a standardized 180-day lactation and weighting for estimated pounds of milk and of butterfat produced, we have developed a rank-ordering scale for all ewes. Ewes are kept, culled or sold as brood ewes based on those rankings. It is uncertain if the culling strategy has had any impact on milk production. In fact, we were somewhat disappointed in the lack of change in production in 2001. Our total number of ewes milked in 2000 was 164: in 2001, 202 ewes. We have typically left the lambs with the ewes for anywhere from 30 to 50 days. While this results in growthy, healthy lambs, it doesn’t put the majority of the ewes’ milk in the bulk tank. The older ewes are synchronized using teaser rams to lamb within a 3-week period beginning about February 1. We’ve typically begun milking about March 10-15, which means that many ewes may have already passed their peak production by the time the first DHI test was performed. As of the September, 2001 test, 171 ewes were still being milked with 52 milking under 1 pound per day. Fifty-one of the ewes are still milking between 2 and 3.5 pounds per day. Several of these ewes lambed January 28-Feb. 9 (11), while most lambed February 12-26 (23), and the remainder lambed in early to mid-March (15). These earliest lambing ewes are still averaging 2.3 pounds of milk per day. The highest producing ewe for this test (3.1 pounds) also had the highest butterfat (8.2%) and is 22% East Fresian. This group of ewes averages 57% East Fresian genetics. Most of these ewes will milk over 210 days, perhaps 220 before drying off. Their estimated milk production for the season is between 675 and 750 pounds, including the amount their lambs took. A few may go over 900 pounds. Our ewe flock average percentage of East Fresian was 45.1% in 2000 and 50.7% in 2001. In 2001, we will be milking a larger proportion of the flock twice a day further into the fall than in 2000. Fewer ewes have been dried off by the August test date than in previous years. The dairy genetics, coupled with close attention to nutrition, appears to extend the milking season. Late season milk has higher cheese yield due to the increased butterfat and protein content; a higher quality product. From our perspective, it seems that one needs to consider making a commitment to milking an extended season in order to realize the production benefits from an investment in East Fresian genetics. Chart 1 compares 2000 and 2001 flock averages for overall production. 1 Thomas, David. Opportunities for Genetic Improvement of Dairy Sheep in North America. Proceedings of the Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium. 1996.

4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Chart 1: Milk Production Comparisons 0 April May June July August Sept. 2000 (N=126-164) 2001 (N=158-202) It is important to note that the two years were quite different in terms of nutrition and weather. In 2000, we were able to feed high quality haylage throughout the ewes’ lactation, while in 2001; the ewes were strictly on pasture. In 2001, the early season haylage was coarse and not as good as the previous year’s. Both seasons, the ewes received about two pounds per day of a corn/roasted soybean mixture. In addition, there were extremes in both heat and humidity on both test dates in July and August 2001 that negatively affected production. As noted earlier, we selected to retain ewes that met our calculations for both milk and butterfat production. It seems that the focus on butterfat production may have yielded some positive results. However, it is again important to qualify that there is typically a negative correlation between pounds of milk produced and butterfat percent. Chart 2 illustrates the flock averages of percent of butterfat comparing year 2000 and 2001. 9.00% 8.00% 7.00% 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% Chart 2: Comparisons of Butterfat April May June July August Sept. Butterfat 2000 (N=126-164) Butterfat 2001 (N=158-202) While we have not been selecting for protein components, there has been a slight desirable change in protein from year 2000 to 2001 as shown on Chart 3. With the very real possibility of future milk pricing being based on milk components, we will base ewe and replacement ewe selection on production of butterfat, protein and total pounds of milk.

<strong>Dairy</strong> <strong>Sheep</strong> Genetics<br />

Any ewe can be milked, however, <strong>the</strong>re are significant differences in personality, letdown,<br />

udder conformation, lactation length, and o<strong>the</strong>r factors that impact sheep dairy pr<strong>of</strong>itability. We<br />

have chosen to select for a combination <strong>of</strong> milk components and production, as well as conformation.<br />

In 1998, we culled our ewe flock heavily based on udder conformation and milking<br />

“attitude”. Each ewe’s udder was rated on a 1-5 scale based on teat placement, strength <strong>of</strong> fore<br />

and rear udder attachment, tightness <strong>of</strong> fit, “meatiness” and willingness to “let-down” with<br />

minimal manipulation.<br />

In 2000 we began un<strong>of</strong>ficial DHI testing through AgSource Cooperative Services. They<br />

provide calibrated meters each month that allows us to estimate <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> each ewe in <strong>the</strong><br />

milking flock. In addition, we receive a monthly status report for each ewe on pounds <strong>of</strong> milk<br />

produced, percent and pounds <strong>of</strong> butterfat and protein, and somatic cell counts. Using a combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> age-factor production factors noted by David Thomas 1 , a standardized 180-day<br />

lactation and weighting for estimated pounds <strong>of</strong> milk and <strong>of</strong> butterfat produced, we have developed<br />

a rank-ordering scale for all ewes. Ewes are kept, culled or sold as brood ewes based on<br />

those rankings.<br />

It is uncertain if <strong>the</strong> culling strategy has had any impact on milk production. In fact, we were<br />

somewhat disappointed in <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> change in production in 2001. Our total number <strong>of</strong> ewes<br />

milked in 2000 was 164: in 2001, 202 ewes. We have typically left <strong>the</strong> lambs with <strong>the</strong> ewes for<br />

anywhere from 30 to 50 days. While this results in growthy, healthy lambs, it doesn’t put <strong>the</strong><br />

majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ewes’ milk in <strong>the</strong> bulk tank. The older ewes are synchronized using teaser rams<br />

to lamb within a 3-week period beginning about February 1. We’ve typically begun milking<br />

about March 10-15, which means that many ewes may have already passed <strong>the</strong>ir peak production<br />

by <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> first DHI test was performed.<br />

As <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> September, 2001 test, 171 ewes were still being milked with 52 milking under 1<br />

pound per day. Fifty-one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ewes are still milking between 2 and 3.5 pounds per day. Several<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se ewes lambed January 28-Feb. 9 (11), while most lambed February 12-26 (23), and<br />

<strong>the</strong> remainder lambed in early to mid-March (15). These earliest lambing ewes are still averaging<br />

2.3 pounds <strong>of</strong> milk per day. The highest producing ewe for this test (3.1 pounds) also had <strong>the</strong><br />

highest butterfat (8.2%) and is 22% East Fresian. This group <strong>of</strong> ewes averages 57% East Fresian<br />

genetics. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se ewes will milk over 210 days, perhaps 220 before drying <strong>of</strong>f. Their<br />

estimated milk production for <strong>the</strong> season is between 675 and 750 pounds, including <strong>the</strong> amount<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir lambs took. A few may go over 900 pounds.<br />

Our ewe flock average percentage <strong>of</strong> East Fresian was 45.1% in 2000 and 50.7% in 2001. In<br />

2001, we will be milking a larger proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flock twice a day fur<strong>the</strong>r into <strong>the</strong> fall than in<br />

2000. Fewer ewes have been dried <strong>of</strong>f by <strong>the</strong> August test date than in previous years. The dairy<br />

genetics, coupled with close attention to nutrition, appears to extend <strong>the</strong> milking season. Late<br />

season milk has higher cheese yield due to <strong>the</strong> increased butterfat and protein content; a higher<br />

quality product. From our perspective, it seems that one needs to consider making a commitment<br />

to milking an extended season in order to realize <strong>the</strong> production benefits from an investment<br />

in East Fresian genetics. Chart 1 compares 2000 and 2001 flock averages for overall<br />

production.<br />

1 Thomas, David. Opportunities for Genetic Improvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dairy</strong> <strong>Sheep</strong> in North America. Proceedings <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Great Lakes <strong>Dairy</strong> <strong>Sheep</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong>. 1996.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!