Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ... Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

ansci.wisc.edu
from ansci.wisc.edu More from this publisher
07.03.2013 Views

MILK STORAGE WITHIN THE UDDER OF EAST FRIESIAN DAIRY EWES OVER A 24 HOUR PERIOD Brett C. McKusick 1 , David L. Thomas 1 , and Pierre-Guy Marnet 2 1 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 2 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR Production du Lait, Rennes, France Abstract Accumulation and storage of milk within the cistern between milkings is advantageous for dairy ruminants because feedback inhibition of lactation and over-distention of the alveoli, factors that potentially limit milk secretion, can be reduced. While the distribution of milk and udder filling rates in dairy cows and goats have been evaluated, there exist no reliable reports in dairy ewes. Additionally, improved techniques for the study of milk distribution within the udder with the aid of an oxytocin receptor antagonist have been recently developed. Cisternal and alveolar milk fractions were measured in multiparous East Friesian-crossbred dairy ewes (n = 32) at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h in a 6 x 6 Latin square design by administration of Atosiban, an oxytocin receptor antagonist, for the recuperation of cisternal milk, followed by injection of oxytocin to remove the alveolar fraction. Less than half (38 to 47%) of the total milk yield is stored within the cistern for the first 12h of udder filling, compared to up to 57% after 24 h. Because subsequent milk yield was significantly reduced following the 16, 20, and 24-h treatments, it is recommended that the milking interval in East Friesian dairy ewes should not exceed 16 h. Although the cistern of dairy ewes is capable of storing large quantities of milk, cisternal milk is significantly inferior in fat content compared to alveolar milk (4.49 vs. 7.92%, respectively) which highlights the importance for proper milk ejection during machine milking of dairy ewes for recuperation of a milk that is rich in total solids. Milk protein percentage was not different between cisternal and alveolar fractions for the majority of milking interval treatments, indicating that casein micelles pass more freely from the alveoli to the cistern between milkings compared to fat globules. Somatic cell count (SCC) decreased with increasing level of milking frequency treatment; alveolar SCC was significantly higher than cisternal SCC at the 16, 20, and 24-hr treatments. At the 24-h treatment, significant increases in cisternal milk yield, fat and protein content, and SCC were observed which implies that some milk transfer to the cistern had occurred even prior to milking, possibly due to contraction of the overly distended alveoli and small intramammary ducts. We conclude that dairy ewes are capable of supporting longer milking intervals (up to 16 h) and that the main difference between milk fractions is the poor fat content within cisternal milk. Introduction Milk within the udder of dairy ruminants can be divided into two fractions: the cisternal fraction which has already been transferred from the alveoli to the cistern during the intermilking interval, and is therefore immediately obtainable without milk ejection; and the alveolar fraction which can only be removed from the udder if milk ejection occurs during machine milking. Large differences between dairy species exist with respect to the proportion of total milk that can be stored within the cistern. For example, the dairy ewe and goat can store up to 75% of the total 199

milk volume within the cistern (Marnet and McKusick, 2001), whereas the cisternal fraction in dairy cattle accounts for approximately only 20% (Bruckmaier, 2001). Physiologically, there are advantages to increased milk storage within the cistern because a protein that serves as a feedback inhibitor of lactation (Wilde et al., 1995) can be diverted away from mammary secretory epithelium. This protein reduces milk synthesis when present in alveolar milk, but is inactive once it has been transferred to the cistern (Henderson and Peaker, 1987; Knight et al., 1994a). Additionally, increased cisternal storage reduces alveolar pressure and potentially avoids deleterious effects on milk synthesis and milk quality from crushing of the epithelium (Labussière, 1993; Peaker, 1980) and/or impairment to the tight junctions between epithelial cells (Stelwagen et al., 1997). Indeed there are several reports that demonstrate the differences in distribution and accumulation of cisternal and alveolar milk fractions in dairy cattle and goats. Knight et al. (1994a) constructed mathematical models for the transfer of milk from the alveoli to the cistern in dairy cattle over a 20-h period and found that secreted milk does not readily appear in the cistern until 4 to 6 h following udder emptying. Theses findings differ from reports in dairy goats in which alveolar and cisternal milk accumulation is linear for the first 6 h (Peaker and Blatchford, 1988). The cistern is a crucial anatomical consideration for milk secretion, because cows with a greater degree of cisternal filling after 24 h have significantly lower production loss after once-daily milking (Davis et al., 1998; Knight and Dewhurst, 1994). Freedom of transfer of milk from the alveoli to the cistern between milkings is an important factor in determining appropriate milking frequencies for dairy cows (Davis et al., 1998), and is consistent with observations of Peaker and Blatchford (1988), who conclude that goats which store more milk in the alveoli between milkings have lower milk secretion rates. Despite the above interest in delineating cisternal and alveolar milk storage within ruminant udders, there are no reliable reports on the way milk is distributed in East Friesian ewes, currently the predominant North American dairy breed. Furthermore, techniques for determining alveolar and cisternal milk fractions have been improved, and now include the use of oxytocin receptor antagonists (Knight et al., 1994b; Wellnitz et al., 1999). The objectives of the present experiment were to measure cisternal and alveolar fractional milk yield and composition at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h with the aid of a specific oxytocin receptor antagonist, to be able to understand how milk accumulates within the udder of East Friesian dairy ewes over a 24-h period. Materials and methods Thirty-two fourth parity East Friesian crossbred dairy ewes in their third month of lactation with similar daily milk production (2.5 ± 0.7 kg/ewe, mean ± SD) were studied during the spring of 2001. Ewes had been selected from the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s main dairy ewe flock of 350 ewes at the Spooner Agricultural Research Station and synchronized for lambing. Ewes were housed in six pens in an indoor laboratory facility on the University of Wisconsin- Madison campus and fed a 16% crude protein grain concentrate and alfalfa haylage. Machine milking was performed on a portable milking platform with cascading head stanchions. The milking machine (Coburn Co., Inc., Whitewater, WI and Interpuls Inc., Albinea, Italy) was set to provide 165 pulsations per minute in a 50:50 ratio with a vacuum level of 37 kPa.

milk volume within <strong>the</strong> cistern (Marnet and McKusick, 2001), whereas <strong>the</strong> cisternal fraction in<br />

dairy cattle accounts for approximately only 20% (Bruckmaier, 2001). Physiologically, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

advantages to increased milk storage within <strong>the</strong> cistern because a protein that serves as a feedback<br />

inhibitor <strong>of</strong> lactation (Wilde et al., 1995) can be diverted away from mammary secretory<br />

epi<strong>the</strong>lium. This protein reduces milk syn<strong>the</strong>sis when present in alveolar milk, but is inactive<br />

once it has been transferred to <strong>the</strong> cistern (Henderson and Peaker, 1987; Knight et al., 1994a).<br />

Additionally, increased cisternal storage reduces alveolar pressure and potentially avoids deleterious<br />

effects on milk syn<strong>the</strong>sis and milk quality from crushing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>lium (Labussière,<br />

1993; Peaker, 1980) and/or impairment to <strong>the</strong> tight junctions between epi<strong>the</strong>lial cells (Stelwagen<br />

et al., 1997).<br />

Indeed <strong>the</strong>re are several reports that demonstrate <strong>the</strong> differences in distribution and accumulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> cisternal and alveolar milk fractions in dairy cattle and goats. Knight et al. (1994a)<br />

constructed ma<strong>the</strong>matical models for <strong>the</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> milk from <strong>the</strong> alveoli to <strong>the</strong> cistern in dairy<br />

cattle over a 20-h period and found that secreted milk does not readily appear in <strong>the</strong> cistern until<br />

4 to 6 h following udder emptying. Theses findings differ from reports in dairy goats in which<br />

alveolar and cisternal milk accumulation is linear for <strong>the</strong> first 6 h (Peaker and Blatchford, 1988).<br />

The cistern is a crucial anatomical consideration for milk secretion, because cows with a greater<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> cisternal filling after 24 h have significantly lower production loss after once-daily<br />

milking (Davis et al., 1998; Knight and Dewhurst, 1994). Freedom <strong>of</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> milk from <strong>the</strong><br />

alveoli to <strong>the</strong> cistern between milkings is an important factor in determining appropriate milking<br />

frequencies for dairy cows (Davis et al., 1998), and is consistent with observations <strong>of</strong> Peaker and<br />

Blatchford (1988), who conclude that goats which store more milk in <strong>the</strong> alveoli between<br />

milkings have lower milk secretion rates.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> above interest in delineating cisternal and alveolar milk storage within ruminant<br />

udders, <strong>the</strong>re are no reliable reports on <strong>the</strong> way milk is distributed in East Friesian ewes, currently<br />

<strong>the</strong> predominant North American dairy breed. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, techniques for determining<br />

alveolar and cisternal milk fractions have been improved, and now include <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> oxytocin<br />

receptor antagonists (Knight et al., 1994b; Wellnitz et al., 1999). The objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present<br />

experiment were to measure cisternal and alveolar fractional milk yield and composition at 4, 8,<br />

12, 16, 20, and 24 h with <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> a specific oxytocin receptor antagonist, to be able to understand<br />

how milk accumulates within <strong>the</strong> udder <strong>of</strong> East Friesian dairy ewes over a 24-h period.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Thirty-two fourth parity East Friesian crossbred dairy ewes in <strong>the</strong>ir third month <strong>of</strong> lactation<br />

with similar daily milk production (2.5 ± 0.7 kg/ewe, mean ± SD) were studied during <strong>the</strong> spring<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2001. Ewes had been selected from <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison’s main dairy ewe<br />

flock <strong>of</strong> 350 ewes at <strong>the</strong> Spooner Agricultural Research Station and synchronized for lambing.<br />

Ewes were housed in six pens in an indoor laboratory facility on <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-<br />

Madison campus and fed a 16% crude protein grain concentrate and alfalfa haylage. Machine<br />

milking was performed on a portable milking platform with cascading head stanchions. The<br />

milking machine (Coburn Co., Inc., Whitewater, WI and Interpuls Inc., Albinea, Italy) was set to<br />

provide 165 pulsations per minute in a 50:50 ratio with a vacuum level <strong>of</strong> 37 kPa.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!