Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ... Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

ansci.wisc.edu
from ansci.wisc.edu More from this publisher
07.03.2013 Views

were higher for lactating ewes during their normal estrous season (fall) compared to ewes lactating during anestrus (spring). Labussière et al. (1993, 1996) demonstrated a significant positive correlation between the number of CL present and the volume of milk obtained at milking in superovulated Lacaune dairy ewes. The East Friesian is highly prolific (McKusick et al., 1999a), and the increased number of CL combined with the large cisternal volume may allow this breed to markedly benefit from an effect of CL on milk production. The objective of the present experiment was to study the effect of a relatively normal number of CL for the East Friesian breed on milk production and composition during mid-lactation. The experiment was designed to remove the potential stimulatory effect of estradiol (E2) on milk production by maintaining high serum progesterone (P4) concentrations during the treatment period with the aid of intravaginal P4. Materials and methods Twenty-four second parity East Friesian crossbred dairy ewes in mid-lactation (77 ± 6 d, mean ± SD) of similar body weight and daily milk production (81 ± 8 kg and 1.9 ± 0.6 kg/d, respectively, mean ± SD) were studied during the summer of 1999. Ewes were selected from the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s main dairy ewe flock of 350 ewes at the Spooner Agricultural Research Station based on their lambing date and daily milk production. Ewes were housed in four separate pens in an indoor laboratory facility on the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus, fed a 16% crude protein grain concentrate and alfalfa haylage, and maintained under constant anestrous light conditions (16:8 hr of light to dark). A schematic diagram of the experimental design is shown in Figure 1. Immediately prior to the experiment, ewes were artificially synchronized for estrus and induced to ovulate by treatment for 14 d with a controlled intravaginal drug-releasing device containing 330 mg of P4 (CIDR, InterAg, New Zealand) from d –17 to –3, relative to expected ovulation (d 0). Twelve hours prior to CIDR removal, 600 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG, Sioux Biochemical, Inc., Sioux Center, IA), and 250 mg of PGF2a (cloprostenol sodium, Estrumate, Bayer Corp., USA) were administered. The experiment was divided into three time periods: d 0 to 5 (pre-treatment), d 6 to 18 (treatment), and d 19 to 25 (post-treatment). Laparoscopy was performed on d 4 for the purpose of counting CL and to affirm that ovulation had occurred. On d 5, ewes were ranked according to number of CL and alternately assigned to one of two treatments: injections at 0630 and 1630 of either saline (CLY, n = 12) or 250 mg of PGF 2α (CLN, n = 12) to allow persistence or regression, respectively, of CL during the treatment period. In addition to the treatments, all ewes in both treatment groups received two CIDRs for the duration of the treatment period in order to maintain circulating P4 at normal, or above, luteal phase concentrations. On d 11, laparoscopy was performed to confirm luteal persistence in CLY ewes and luteolysis in CLN ewes. On d 18, CIDRs were removed and all ewes received an injection of 250 mg of PGF 2α . Machine milking took place at 0630 and 1630 in groups of 6 ewes on a portable milking platform with cascading head stanchions. The milking machine (Coburn Co., Inc., Whitewater, WI and Interpuls Inc., Albinea, Italy) was set to provide 180 pulsations per minute in a 50:50 ratio with a vacuum level of 37 kPa. Individual ewe milk production and milking time were recorded at every milking (d 1 to 25) and milk samples were collected periodically at the morning milking (d 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 18, 25). Average milk flow rate was calculated by

dividing the amount of milk obtained by the machine milking time (not including machine stripping milk yield or time). Milk composition analyses for percentages of fat and protein were performed by a State of Wisconsin certified laboratory. Test-day milk fat and protein yield were calculated by multiplying morning milk production by percentage of milk fat or protein. Individual jugular blood samples for P4 and/or E2 immunoassay were collected at 0830 (d –2, 0, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 21, 25) into vacutainer tubes, refrigerated at 4° C for 24 h, and then centrifuged for 15 min at 3000 x g. The serum was harvested and frozen at –20° C. Serum P4 concentration was determined by enzyme immunoassay in duplicate after double extraction in petroleum ether according to Rasmussen et al. (1996). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 9.9 and 11.6%, respectively. Serum samples for E2 concentration were pooled for each ewe within a period (estrus: d –2; pre-treatment: d 0 to 5, treatment: d 6 to 18; and post-treatment: d 19 to 25). Serum E2 concentration was determined by radioimmunoassay according to Kulick et al. (1999) with an intra-assay coefficient of variation of 16.0%. Analyses of variance were conducted with the general linear models procedure of SAS (1999) for a split plot on time experimental design. Traits analyzed were milk yield, milk flow rate, milk fat and protein content, and serum P4 and E2 concentration. The following independent variables and their interactions were included in the model for each trait, except E2 concentration: main plot effects- treatment (CLY or CLN), pen (A, B, C, or D), treatment x pen, and ewe within treatment x pen; sub-plot effects- period (pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment), treatment x period, pen x period, day (0 to 25) within period, treatment x day within period, and pen x day within period. Because of unexpected pre-treatment differences noted a posteriori among treatment groups in percentages of milk fat and protein, the d-4 test-day value was used as a continuous covariable for analyses of milk composition during the treatment and post-treatment periods. Differences among treatment x period combinations and treatment x day within period combinations were tested for significance against residual error. Because serum E2 concentration was obtained from samples pooled within a ewe and period, day within period and all interactions with day within period were dropped from the model used to analyze E2 concentration. Results Ovulation and the presence or absence of CL for CLY and CLN ewes was affirmed by laparoscopy on d 4 (3.4 ± 1.6 vs. 3.3 ± 1.3 CL per ewe, mean ± SD, respectively), and on d 11 during the treatment period (2.4 ± 1.1 vs. 0 CL per ewe, mean ± SD, respectively). Data are summarized in Table 1 for the treatment x experimental period combinations; the evolution of treatment differences over time is displayed in Figures 2 to 5. Following treatment on d 5 with PGF 2α (CLN only) and CIDRs (both groups), average daily milk yield of CLY ewes increased (P < 0.05) from their pre-treatment production level (from 1.42 to 1.56 kg/d) and was greater (P < 0.05) than the milk yield of CLN ewes (1.44 kg/d) during the treatment period (Table 1). Higher milk yield in CLY ewes first reached significance on d 9 (4 d after treatment, Figure 2A) and averaged 10% greater than CLN milk yield throughout the treatment period (d 6 to18, Table 1). Peak milk yield occurred on d 10 (1.71 kg/d) for CLY ewes, but as early as d 6 (1.57 kg/d, 1 d after PGF 2α treatment) for CLN ewes (Figure 2A). After CIDR removal and PGF 2α treatment on d 18 (post-treatment period), milk yield for CLY ewes returned to levels lower than pre-treatment period production (1.35 kg/d), but averaged 8% greater (P < 0.05) than for CLN ewes (1.25 kg/d, Table 1). Average daily milk flow rate was 17 and 25% greater (P

were higher for lactating ewes during <strong>the</strong>ir normal estrous season (fall) compared to ewes lactating<br />

during anestrus (spring). Labussière et al. (1993, 1996) demonstrated a significant positive<br />

correlation between <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> CL present and <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> milk obtained at milking in<br />

superovulated Lacaune dairy ewes. The East Friesian is highly prolific (McKusick et al., 1999a),<br />

and <strong>the</strong> increased number <strong>of</strong> CL combined with <strong>the</strong> large cisternal volume may allow this breed<br />

to markedly benefit from an effect <strong>of</strong> CL on milk production.<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present experiment was to study <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> a relatively normal number<br />

<strong>of</strong> CL for <strong>the</strong> East Friesian breed on milk production and composition during mid-lactation. The<br />

experiment was designed to remove <strong>the</strong> potential stimulatory effect <strong>of</strong> estradiol (E2) on milk<br />

production by maintaining high serum progesterone (P4) concentrations during <strong>the</strong> treatment<br />

period with <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> intravaginal P4.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Twenty-four second parity East Friesian crossbred dairy ewes in mid-lactation (77 ± 6 d,<br />

mean ± SD) <strong>of</strong> similar body weight and daily milk production (81 ± 8 kg and 1.9 ± 0.6 kg/d,<br />

respectively, mean ± SD) were studied during <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>of</strong> 1999. Ewes were selected from <strong>the</strong><br />

University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison’s main dairy ewe flock <strong>of</strong> 350 ewes at <strong>the</strong> Spooner Agricultural<br />

Research Station based on <strong>the</strong>ir lambing date and daily milk production. Ewes were housed<br />

in four separate pens in an indoor laboratory facility on <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison<br />

campus, fed a 16% crude protein grain concentrate and alfalfa haylage, and maintained under<br />

constant anestrous light conditions (16:8 hr <strong>of</strong> light to dark).<br />

A schematic diagram <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental design is shown in Figure 1. Immediately prior to<br />

<strong>the</strong> experiment, ewes were artificially synchronized for estrus and induced to ovulate by treatment<br />

for 14 d with a controlled intravaginal drug-releasing device containing 330 mg <strong>of</strong> P4<br />

(CIDR, InterAg, New Zealand) from d –17 to –3, relative to expected ovulation (d 0). Twelve<br />

hours prior to CIDR removal, 600 IU <strong>of</strong> pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG, Sioux<br />

Biochemical, Inc., Sioux Center, IA), and 250 mg <strong>of</strong> PGF2a (cloprostenol sodium, Estrumate,<br />

Bayer Corp., USA) were administered.<br />

The experiment was divided into three time periods: d 0 to 5 (pre-treatment), d 6 to 18<br />

(treatment), and d 19 to 25 (post-treatment). Laparoscopy was performed on d 4 for <strong>the</strong> purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> counting CL and to affirm that ovulation had occurred. On d 5, ewes were ranked according<br />

to number <strong>of</strong> CL and alternately assigned to one <strong>of</strong> two treatments: injections at 0630 and 1630<br />

<strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r saline (CLY, n = 12) or 250 mg <strong>of</strong> PGF 2α (CLN, n = 12) to allow persistence or regression,<br />

respectively, <strong>of</strong> CL during <strong>the</strong> treatment period. In addition to <strong>the</strong> treatments, all ewes in<br />

both treatment groups received two CIDRs for <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> treatment period in order to<br />

maintain circulating P4 at normal, or above, luteal phase concentrations. On d 11, laparoscopy<br />

was performed to confirm luteal persistence in CLY ewes and luteolysis in CLN ewes. On d 18,<br />

CIDRs were removed and all ewes received an injection <strong>of</strong> 250 mg <strong>of</strong> PGF 2α .<br />

Machine milking took place at 0630 and 1630 in groups <strong>of</strong> 6 ewes on a portable milking<br />

platform with cascading head stanchions. The milking machine (Coburn Co., Inc., Whitewater,<br />

WI and Interpuls Inc., Albinea, Italy) was set to provide 180 pulsations per minute in a 50:50<br />

ratio with a vacuum level <strong>of</strong> 37 kPa. Individual ewe milk production and milking time were<br />

recorded at every milking (d 1 to 25) and milk samples were collected periodically at <strong>the</strong> morning<br />

milking (d 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 18, 25). Average milk flow rate was calculated by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!