Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ... Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

ansci.wisc.edu
from ansci.wisc.edu More from this publisher
07.03.2013 Views

Disadvantages of a Group Breeding Scheme - A group Breeding Scheme, by definition, involves only a small population. - The progeny testing of promising young rams lengthens the generation interval. However this is true for all types of selection program. Progeny testing greatly increase the accuracy of EPDs. - Very little improvement will be realized until genetic links between flocks are established (2-3 years). - Members of the group need to be very involved. The Group Breeding Scheme is totally managed by the members and by no one else. - At the present time neither NSIP or ROP calculate EPDs for milk production. Intense lobbying needs to be done. - Some costs are involved: milk production recording, analysis of milk samples for composition, enrollment in NSIP (or other), semen collection, artificial insemination, more rams kept for progeny testing, etc… Conclusion So far milk production of the “dairy ewes” in North America has increased dramatically due to the introduction of East Friesian germ plasm but at the same time milk composition has deteriorated. Moreover, a crossbreeding system, in the long run, is difficultl to sustain without inching toward a pure breed, which might not be desirable because of increasing unfavorable effects such as lack of adaptation to the environment. Therefore, a selection program based on milk production AND milk composition appears necessary in the long run. Because of a manageable size, low cost and high efficiency (when well run) Group Breeding Schemes could very well be the solution. References Y. M. Berger. 2001. Genetic Improvement of the Lactation Performance of Sheep. In: “The fundamental principles of sheep dairying in North America”. (submitted for publication through The University of Wisconsin-Extension Press). D.R. Guy. (1996). The Why and How of Sire Referencing. Proceedings of the 2nd Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium. March 28, 1996, Madison, Wisconsin. G. Simms and N.R. Wray. 1996. Sheep Sire Referencing Schemes: New Opportunities for Pedigree Breeders and Lamb Producers. Proceedings of the 2nd Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium. March 28, 1996, Madison, Wisconsin. D.L. Thomas. (1994). Group Breeding Scheme for Sheep. (Unpublished) D. L. Thomas. (1996). Factors Influencing Progress from Selection. (Unpublished).

CAN THE OVARY INFLUENCE MILK PRODUCTION IN DAIRY EWES? Brett C. McKusick 1 , Milo C. Wiltbank 2 , Roberto Sartori 2 , Pierre-Guy Marnet 3 , and David L. Thomas 1 Departments of Animal Sciences 1 and Dairy Science 2 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 3 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR Production du Lait, Rennes, France Abstract In dairy ewes with large cisternal storage capacity, such as the East Friesian, we hypothesize that milk transfer between milkings from the alveoli to the cisterns, and therefore overall milk production and composition, might be improved by the hormonal milieu created by the presence of corpora lutea (CL). Furthermore, we wanted to evaluate this effect with the number of CL that would be typically present during the estrous season and without the potential stimulatory effect of estradiol (E2) on milk production. Mid-lactation East Friesian crossbred ewes (n = 24) were synchronized for estrus with intravaginal progesterone (CIDR), PGF 2α , and gonadotropins. Following ovulation, CL were counted via laparoscopy on d 4, and the ewes were studied during three time periods (pre-treatment: d 0 to 5; treatment: d 6 to 18; post-treatment: d 19 to 25). On d 5, ewes received a treatment of either saline (CLY, n = 12) or PGF 2α (CLN, n = 12) to allow CL persistence or regression, respectively. Additionally, all ewes received two CIDRs during the treatment period to provide high concentrations of plasma progesterone (P4). All ewes received PGF2 2α on d 18. Milk yield and milk flow rate were recorded daily, milk samples were obtained periodically for analyses of milk fat and protein, and jugular blood samples were collected for P4 and E2 immunoassay. During the treatment period, CLY ewes had higher daily milk yield (1.56 vs. 1.44 kg/d) and milk flow rate (244 vs. 208 ml/min) and produced more milk fat (92.2 vs. 81.1 g/d) and milk protein (83.7 vs. 77.5 g/d) compared to CLN ewes, respectively. These trends were maintained during the post-treatment period, despite luteolysis in CLY ewes. Thus, milk production was increased in East Friesian ewes due to the presence of CL, consistent with other reports of a putative role of luteal oxytocin (OT) in milk transfer between milkings and/or a direct effect of OT on secretory epithelium. Introduction In species with large cisternal storage capacity, such as the dairy ewe, milk transfer from the alveoli to the cistern between milkings may improve milk yield by reducing the concentration of negative feedback inhibitors of lactation in the area of the alveoli (Wilde et al., 1987), and may improve efficiency of milk removal due to increased udder filling (Bruckmaier, 2001) or by allowing for increased cisternal intramammary pressure, thereby increasing milk flow rate (McKusick and Marnet, 2001, unpublished data). Compared to most other dairy sheep breeds, the East Friesian has relatively larger cisterns (Bruckmaier et al., 1997; McKusick et al., 1999b) and this may provide increased milk storage between milkings. Although the mechanism by which milk is transferred between milkings from the alveoli to the cistern is not completely clear, it has been hypothesized that oxytocin (OT) secreted from the corpus luteum (CL) might be responsible for myoepithelial contraction and could play a significant role in dairy ewes. Marnet et al. (1998) showed that baseline plasma OT concentrations 186

CAN THE OVARY INFLUENCE MILK PRODUCTION IN DAIRY EWES?<br />

Brett C. McKusick 1 , Milo C. Wiltbank 2 , Roberto Sartori 2 , Pierre-Guy Marnet 3 ,<br />

and David L. Thomas 1<br />

<strong>Department</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> 1 and <strong>Dairy</strong> Science 2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison, Madison<br />

3 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR Production du Lait,<br />

Rennes, France<br />

Abstract<br />

In dairy ewes with large cisternal storage capacity, such as <strong>the</strong> East Friesian, we hypo<strong>the</strong>size<br />

that milk transfer between milkings from <strong>the</strong> alveoli to <strong>the</strong> cisterns, and <strong>the</strong>refore overall milk<br />

production and composition, might be improved by <strong>the</strong> hormonal milieu created by <strong>the</strong> presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> corpora lutea (CL). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, we wanted to evaluate this effect with <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> CL<br />

that would be typically present during <strong>the</strong> estrous season and without <strong>the</strong> potential stimulatory<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> estradiol (E2) on milk production. Mid-lactation East Friesian crossbred ewes (n = 24)<br />

were synchronized for estrus with intravaginal progesterone (CIDR), PGF 2α , and gonadotropins.<br />

Following ovulation, CL were counted via laparoscopy on d 4, and <strong>the</strong> ewes were studied during<br />

three time periods (pre-treatment: d 0 to 5; treatment: d 6 to 18; post-treatment: d 19 to 25). On<br />

d 5, ewes received a treatment <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r saline (CLY, n = 12) or PGF 2α (CLN, n = 12) to allow CL<br />

persistence or regression, respectively. Additionally, all ewes received two CIDRs during <strong>the</strong><br />

treatment period to provide high concentrations <strong>of</strong> plasma progesterone (P4). All ewes received<br />

PGF2 2α on d 18. Milk yield and milk flow rate were recorded daily, milk samples were obtained<br />

periodically for analyses <strong>of</strong> milk fat and protein, and jugular blood samples were collected for P4<br />

and E2 immunoassay. During <strong>the</strong> treatment period, CLY ewes had higher daily milk yield (1.56<br />

vs. 1.44 kg/d) and milk flow rate (244 vs. 208 ml/min) and produced more milk fat (92.2 vs. 81.1<br />

g/d) and milk protein (83.7 vs. 77.5 g/d) compared to CLN ewes, respectively. These trends<br />

were maintained during <strong>the</strong> post-treatment period, despite luteolysis in CLY ewes. Thus, milk<br />

production was increased in East Friesian ewes due to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> CL, consistent with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

reports <strong>of</strong> a putative role <strong>of</strong> luteal oxytocin (OT) in milk transfer between milkings and/or a<br />

direct effect <strong>of</strong> OT on secretory epi<strong>the</strong>lium.<br />

Introduction<br />

In species with large cisternal storage capacity, such as <strong>the</strong> dairy ewe, milk transfer from <strong>the</strong><br />

alveoli to <strong>the</strong> cistern between milkings may improve milk yield by reducing <strong>the</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

negative feedback inhibitors <strong>of</strong> lactation in <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alveoli (Wilde et al., 1987), and may<br />

improve efficiency <strong>of</strong> milk removal due to increased udder filling (Bruckmaier, 2001) or by<br />

allowing for increased cisternal intramammary pressure, <strong>the</strong>reby increasing milk flow rate<br />

(McKusick and Marnet, 2001, unpublished data). Compared to most o<strong>the</strong>r dairy sheep breeds,<br />

<strong>the</strong> East Friesian has relatively larger cisterns (Bruckmaier et al., 1997; McKusick et al., 1999b)<br />

and this may provide increased milk storage between milkings.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> mechanism by which milk is transferred between milkings from <strong>the</strong> alveoli to<br />

<strong>the</strong> cistern is not completely clear, it has been hypo<strong>the</strong>sized that oxytocin (OT) secreted from <strong>the</strong><br />

corpus luteum (CL) might be responsible for myoepi<strong>the</strong>lial contraction and could play a significant<br />

role in dairy ewes. Marnet et al. (1998) showed that baseline plasma OT concentrations<br />

186

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!