Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ... Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

ansci.wisc.edu
from ansci.wisc.edu More from this publisher
07.03.2013 Views

Presented in Table 3 is the lactation performance of one-year-old ewes in 1996 and 1997, and two-year-old ewes in 1997. The East Friesian-cross ewes had lactations that were 33 days longer and produced 115 lb. more milk (1.91 times as much milk), 2.2 kg more fat, and 2.2 kg more protein compared to the Dorset-cross ewes (P < .05, Table 3). Fat and protein percentage of milk from East Friesian-cross ewes was approximately .5 percentage units lower (P < .05) compared to milk from Dorset-cross ewes. As mature ewes and under management systems where milking started 24 hours postpartum, these same East Friesian-cross ewes had average milk yields of 519 to 572 lb. (McKusick et al., 2001). In addition, East Friesian-cross lambs had greater growth rates than Dorset-cross lambs, and East Friesian-cross ewes had greater prolificacy and weaned more lambs per ewe than Dorsetcross ewes (Thomas et al., 2000). Therefore, sheep of 50% or less East Friesian breeding were superior to Dorset-cross sheep in milk production, reproduction, and lamb growth. The only detrimental effect of East Friesian breeding found was reduced lamb survival in lambs of over 50% East Friesian breeding compared to non-East Friesian lambs or lambs of 50% or less East Friesian breeding (Thomas et al., 2000). It appears that lambs of high percentage East Friesian breeding are more susceptible to respiratory disease. This also has been reported with East Friesian and East Friesian-crosses in Greece (Katsaounis and Zygoyiannis, 1986) and France (Ricordeau and Flamant, 1969). Table 3. Least squares means for lactation performance of young EFcross and Dorset-cross ewes Breed of ewe: Trait Dorset-cross EF-cross Number of lactations 76 246 Lactation length, d 92.7 ± 4.2 a 126.2 ± 2.6 b Milk yield, lb. 125.2 ± 12.1 a 240.0 ± 7.5 b Fat, % 5.54 ± .07 a 5.02 ± .05 b Fat yield, kg 3.3 ± .3 a 5.5 ± .1 b Protein, % 5.42 ± .05 a 4.97 ± .03 b Protein, kg 3.2 ± .3 a 5.4± .1 b Log somatic cell count 4.99 ± .09 a 5.03 ± .04 a a,b Within a row, means with a different superscript are different (P < .05). Continued experimentation with East Friesian crosses at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and their performance in commercial dairy flocks in the U.S. and Canada further showed their superiority for milk production, and most commercial operations moved quickly to crossbred, high percentage, or purebred East Friesian ewes. A crossbred East Friesian or high percentage East Friesian ewe is still the most common ewe found in commercial sheep dairies in North America today. With the availability of both East Friesian and Lacaune dairy sheep breeding in North America in 1997, the University of Wisconsin-Madison initiated a study in 1998 to compare sheep sired by East Friesian rams and Lacaune rams for lamb and milk production under dairy

sheep production conditions in Wisconsin. Results have been summarized through 2001 (Thomas et al., 2001). Ewes of 1/2 East Friesian or 1/2 Lacaune breeding were produced by mating non-dairy ewes to one of four purebred East Friesian rams or one of five purebred Lacaune rams. Ewes born in 1999 have been evaluated for milk production as one- and two-year-old ewes in 2000 and 2001, respectively, and ewes born in 2000 have been evaluated as one-year-old ewes in 2001. One-year-old ewes were milked after they weaned their lambs at 30 days postpartum, and two-year-old ewes were milked from 24 hours postpartum. Lactation results are presented in Table 4. There was a small advantage of the East Friesiancross ewes for milk production (+31 lb.) but this difference was not significant. The East Friesian-cross ewes had longer (P < .05, +11.9 d) lactation lengths but lower (P < .05) percentage milk fat (-.40%) and milk protein (-.26%). The differences between the two breeds for lactation traits are not large, and differences between the breeds for reproductive and growth traits also are not large (Thomas et al., 2001). We do not yet have a good measure of differences in lamb mortality between East Friesian and Lacaune breeding. The study will continue for a few more years, but at the present time, it appears that either East Friesian-crossbred or Lacaune-crossbred ewes can be utilized successfully in a dairy sheep operation. Table 4. Lactation traits (mean ± SE) of F1 ewes produced from East Friesian or Lacaune sires and non-dairy dams during their first and second lactations Breed Lactation Protein, Protein, group N Milk, lb length, d Fat, lb. Fat, % lb. % _ EF 75 291.8±14.3 126.3±3.8 a _ LA 83 260.8±13.6 114.4±3.6 b 1/2 1/2 16.3±1.0 5.49±.13 b 15.8±.9 5.89±.12 a a,b,c Means within a column with no superscripts in common are significantly different (P < .05). 13.7±.7 4.65±.09 b 13.2±.7 4.91±.08 a Josef Regli reported on the performance of purebred East Friesian and Lacaune sheep on his commercial farm in Ontario, Canada (Regli, 1999). He reported similar milk yields between the breeds but higher percentage milk fat and protein from the Lacaune. He also noted that the Lacaune ewes had better udder conformation and were less susceptible to respiratory disease and mastitis compared to the East Friesian ewes. However, the East Friesian ewes were easier to handle than were the Lacaune ewes. Economic Effects of Breed Choice Higher levels of milk production will generally result in greater net returns so dairy-cross ewes should be used. Table 5 gives the estimated returns for a 300-ewe flock of either non-dairy, 1/4-dairy, or 1/2-dairy ewes adapted from an economic analysis presented by Berger (1998). The results clearly show the economic advantage of obtaining higher milk yields from dairy-cross ewes. It is difficult to justify a dairy sheep operation based on a non-dairy ewe. The returns in Table 5 are based on equal milk values from the three production levels. It is true that ewes of the lower production levels will produce milk that is higher in fat and protein and that will generate a greater cheese yield and, perhaps, a higher quality cheese. If there are price premiums for milks of higher solids content and price discounts for milk of lower solids content, differences in returns between these production levels will decrease somewhat. However, the higher production levels will still have significantly higher returns.

sheep production conditions in Wisconsin. Results have been summarized through 2001 (Thomas<br />

et al., 2001). Ewes <strong>of</strong> 1/2 East Friesian or 1/2 Lacaune breeding were produced by mating<br />

non-dairy ewes to one <strong>of</strong> four purebred East Friesian rams or one <strong>of</strong> five purebred Lacaune rams.<br />

Ewes born in 1999 have been evaluated for milk production as one- and two-year-old ewes in<br />

2000 and 2001, respectively, and ewes born in 2000 have been evaluated as one-year-old ewes in<br />

2001. One-year-old ewes were milked after <strong>the</strong>y weaned <strong>the</strong>ir lambs at 30 days postpartum, and<br />

two-year-old ewes were milked from 24 hours postpartum.<br />

Lactation results are presented in Table 4. There was a small advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> East Friesiancross<br />

ewes for milk production (+31 lb.) but this difference was not significant. The East Friesian-cross<br />

ewes had longer (P < .05, +11.9 d) lactation lengths but lower (P < .05) percentage<br />

milk fat (-.40%) and milk protein (-.26%). The differences between <strong>the</strong> two breeds for lactation<br />

traits are not large, and differences between <strong>the</strong> breeds for reproductive and growth traits also are<br />

not large (Thomas et al., 2001). We do not yet have a good measure <strong>of</strong> differences in lamb<br />

mortality between East Friesian and Lacaune breeding. The study will continue for a few more<br />

years, but at <strong>the</strong> present time, it appears that ei<strong>the</strong>r East Friesian-crossbred or Lacaune-crossbred<br />

ewes can be utilized successfully in a dairy sheep operation.<br />

Table 4. Lactation traits (mean ± SE) <strong>of</strong> F1 ewes produced from East Friesian or<br />

Lacaune sires and non-dairy dams during <strong>the</strong>ir first and second lactations<br />

Breed<br />

Lactation<br />

Protein, Protein,<br />

group N Milk, lb length, d Fat, lb. Fat, % lb. %<br />

_ EF 75 291.8±14.3 126.3±3.8 a<br />

_ LA 83 260.8±13.6 114.4±3.6 b<br />

1/2<br />

1/2<br />

16.3±1.0 5.49±.13 b<br />

15.8±.9 5.89±.12 a<br />

a,b,c Means within a column with no superscripts in common are significantly different (P < .05).<br />

13.7±.7 4.65±.09 b<br />

13.2±.7 4.91±.08 a<br />

Josef Regli reported on <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> purebred East Friesian and Lacaune sheep on his<br />

commercial farm in Ontario, Canada (Regli, 1999). He reported similar milk yields between <strong>the</strong><br />

breeds but higher percentage milk fat and protein from <strong>the</strong> Lacaune. He also noted that <strong>the</strong><br />

Lacaune ewes had better udder conformation and were less susceptible to respiratory disease and<br />

mastitis compared to <strong>the</strong> East Friesian ewes. However, <strong>the</strong> East Friesian ewes were easier to<br />

handle than were <strong>the</strong> Lacaune ewes.<br />

Economic Effects <strong>of</strong> Breed Choice<br />

Higher levels <strong>of</strong> milk production will generally result in greater net returns so dairy-cross<br />

ewes should be used. Table 5 gives <strong>the</strong> estimated returns for a 300-ewe flock <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r non-dairy,<br />

1/4-dairy, or 1/2-dairy ewes adapted from an economic analysis presented by Berger (1998). The<br />

results clearly show <strong>the</strong> economic advantage <strong>of</strong> obtaining higher milk yields from dairy-cross<br />

ewes. It is difficult to justify a dairy sheep operation based on a non-dairy ewe.<br />

The returns in Table 5 are based on equal milk values from <strong>the</strong> three production levels. It is<br />

true that ewes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower production levels will produce milk that is higher in fat and protein<br />

and that will generate a greater cheese yield and, perhaps, a higher quality cheese. If <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

price premiums for milks <strong>of</strong> higher solids content and price discounts for milk <strong>of</strong> lower solids<br />

content, differences in returns between <strong>the</strong>se production levels will decrease somewhat. However,<br />

<strong>the</strong> higher production levels will still have significantly higher returns.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!