Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...
Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ... Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...
Background and History: Most sheep producers are aware that while most breeds of sheep are seasonal breeders, there is a continuum in different breeds and individuals within breeds ranging from very short breeding seasons to practically year round breeding. Our East Friesian flock is somewhere in the middle of that continuum with a natural breeding season that ranges from mid-August to mid- February. Therefore, we can easily extend our lambing period from early January to mid -June. Historically, however, under natural conditions, we could expect only between 15 to 25 percent of ewes exposed to rams between March and June to lamb in the Fall. Because of this, in our early years, we experienced chronic shortages of fresh milk from September though December, and surplus production in April though June or July. Not only did this cause chaos in our marketing efforts, it also caused our lambing and milking barns to be over-taxed for part of the year and under-utilized in another part of the year. In the past, we experimented with hormone treatments to increase Fall lambing. While hormone treatments did improve the out of season lambing numbers over natural breeding, the results varied from year to year, ranging from 30 percent to 70 percent success rates. Additionally, hormones are costly in terms of both money and labor. The cost is about eight dollars per ewe, and the treatment regimen requires each ewe treated to be handled individually twice. And, most importantly, the use of hormones did not fit philosophically into our otherwise organic management of the farm. Protocol: This was not a scientific experiment. We made no effort to compare one protocol with another, to maintain control groups or to compare light control with a number of other methods in the same year to evaluate results. We haven’t even done our project exactly the same way each year. We simply chose a protocol we thought might work, and we tried it. However, because we do have good records going back a number of years we were able to compare our results using the light control with results from hormone treatment and natural breeding. We discovered a number of different light treatment protocols when we first started looking into trying it for our farm. However, many of the protocols were developed by researchers who needed lambs all year around for their research, and most involved year-long schedules that required climate-controlled buildings where day could be turned to night and night into day. These protocols worked very well, but are not practical for most farms. We settled on a protocol that only required lengthening day lengths, which is much easier than shortening day lengths. Simply put, we started groups under lights the first week of January, and kept them under 20-hour days for 60 days. We were advised by some that a 16-hour day would work, and by others that 24 hours of light would work. Some said the dark period had to be complete and total darkness, meaning even a streetlight within 50 yards of the building would compromise the results, others disagreed. We decided to keep the lights on from 4 AM until midnight and made every effort to keep the dark period from midnight until 4 AM as dark as possible. Since the barn we use is far from other light sources, this has not proved difficult. After 60 days under the lights, the ewes were moved outside into normal day lengths. Rams were introduced about four weeks later and the ewes started cycling within a week or so. We have found that some ewes will start cycling right away, and some will cycle as much as six to eight weeks later.
The rams are put under the same light treatment protocol, but in a completely different building. We feel it is important for the ewes to be out of sight and smell of the rams until they are exposed to them at the end of the protocol. This way we also take advantage of the “ram effect” that has been well documented. Lights Used: We have used three different barns with somewhat different light levels successfully, so it seems that varying brightness levels of light in the barns can produce good results. We have not tried changing the light intensity to compare results. It is possible different light levels would produce better results than we have experienced. A research project comparing light levels would probably produce some useful information on this subject. In all of our barns we have 100-watt metal halide fixtures. This type of fixture is relatively expensive to buy and install, but they are very energy efficient, providing about 450 watts of light per 100 watts of electricity used. Although the lights are installed a bit differently in each barn, on average they are about 14 feet above the barn floor and are spaced about 25 feet apart. At night, the barns are not extremely bright inside, but there is enough light to read a book or newspaper without much strain. Results: We are now into our third year of light treatment, and because we have done things a bit differently every year, it will be most straightforward if each year’s results are presented independently. We started cautiously in 1999, because we had no idea how the system would work. Ewes selected for the light control group were held back from breeding during the normal Fall season, so if the light treatment protocol didn’t work, we would have lost production of those ewes for the season. In discussing our results, it is necessary to digress a bit to explain one aspect of the way we manage our flock. For the past five years, our flock has been divided into two groups, the “Elite Group” and the “Production Group”. The Elite Group consists of our highest milk-producing ewes. This group is blood tested three times a year to screen for disease, and it is the source of all replacement stock for our use or for sale. The two groups are kept separate in every phase of the operation. No replacement stock is kept from the Production Group. Practically, this means during breeding ewes in the Production Group can be exposed to a number of rams simultaneously, because it is not important for us to know the sire of lambs from that group. Of course the opposite is true for the Elite Group. Ewes from the Elite Group can only be exposed to one ram at a time, because it is critical to our selection program to know the sire of replacement stock. This turns out to be important for the light control protocol because, as you will see later, we have had different success rates in the two groups. In 1999 we started only one group of 50 ewes in the first week of January. In the first week of March the group was turned out to a winter paddock, and five weeks later, the rams were introduced. These ewes were all from our production group, so we were able to put a number of rams in the group. Within six weeks, 87 percent of the ewes had been marked, and 62 percent of those ewes eventually lambed sometime in the fall, which we defined as September 1 st through December 31 st .
- Page 95 and 96: ing, the cheeses were brined for 18
- Page 97 and 98: The FFA concentrations generally in
- Page 99 and 100: Table 1. Composition of pasteurized
- Page 101: Table 6. Body and texture scores 1
- Page 104 and 105: Present Development of Selection Sc
- Page 106 and 107: Breed Usage in Europe Crossbreeding
- Page 108 and 109: nearly 1. As a consequence this cha
- Page 110 and 111: Table 5. Repeatabilities and phenot
- Page 112 and 113: percentage is not expected to resul
- Page 114 and 115: Improved AI technique Artificial in
- Page 116 and 117: Identifying major genes or QTL rela
- Page 118 and 119: Figure 5. Half-sib families and QTL
- Page 120 and 121: In the case of cheese the problem i
- Page 122 and 123: Emanuelson, U., Danell, B., Philips
- Page 124 and 125: Rothschild, M. F., Soller, M. (1997
- Page 126 and 127: teat placement in dairy ewes (Fern
- Page 128 and 129: that of the average milking time. M
- Page 130 and 131: 1988) and active expulsion of fat f
- Page 132 and 133: References Barillet, F., and F. Boc
- Page 134 and 135: Table 1. Least squares means ± SEM
- Page 136 and 137: Table 3. Simulation of parlor throu
- Page 138 and 139: EFFECT OF REDUCING THE FREQUENCY OF
- Page 140 and 141: Individual ewe milk production (mor
- Page 142 and 143: dimanche soir sur les brebis de rac
- Page 144 and 145: A B A Morning milk yield, kg B Adj.
- Page 148 and 149: Percent 100 80 60 40 20 0 87 Effect
- Page 150 and 151: Fall Lambing Percentage 100 90 80 7
- Page 152 and 153: THE EFFECT OF GROWTH RATE ON MAMMAR
- Page 154 and 155: After puberty, the mammary gland re
- Page 156 and 157: Many trials have examined the mamma
- Page 158 and 159: From these results the authors conc
- Page 160 and 161: Onset of Puberty and Reproductive P
- Page 162 and 163: Similarly, calves, heifers, and cow
- Page 164 and 165: McCann, M. A., Goode, L., Harvey, R
- Page 166 and 167: DISCUSSION Stability of Frozen Raw
- Page 168 and 169: analyzed for titratable acidity, sy
- Page 170: 411-416. Wendorff, W.L. 1998. Updat
- Page 175 and 176: Recent Outbreaks involving Cheddar
- Page 177 and 178: testing on raw milk at the farm. Th
- Page 179 and 180: THE AUSTRALIAN SHEEP DAIRY INDUSTRY
- Page 181 and 182: The University of Western Australia
- Page 183 and 184: Heterosis did not seem to intervene
- Page 185 and 186: Lambs The problem of weaning lambs
- Page 187 and 188: GROUP BREEDING SCHEME: A FEASIBLE S
- Page 189 and 190: Where: h = square root of heritabil
- Page 191 and 192: Second step. All members enroll in
- Page 193 and 194: The structure and movement of anima
- Page 195 and 196: CAN THE OVARY INFLUENCE MILK PRODUC
The rams are put under <strong>the</strong> same light treatment protocol, but in a completely different<br />
building. We feel it is important for <strong>the</strong> ewes to be out <strong>of</strong> sight and smell <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rams until <strong>the</strong>y<br />
are exposed to <strong>the</strong>m at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> protocol. This way we also take advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “ram<br />
effect” that has been well documented.<br />
Lights Used:<br />
We have used three different barns with somewhat different light levels successfully, so it<br />
seems that varying brightness levels <strong>of</strong> light in <strong>the</strong> barns can produce good results. We have not<br />
tried changing <strong>the</strong> light intensity to compare results. It is possible different light levels would<br />
produce better results than we have experienced. A research project comparing light levels<br />
would probably produce some useful information on this subject.<br />
In all <strong>of</strong> our barns we have 100-watt metal halide fixtures. This type <strong>of</strong> fixture is relatively<br />
expensive to buy and install, but <strong>the</strong>y are very energy efficient, providing about 450 watts <strong>of</strong><br />
light per 100 watts <strong>of</strong> electricity used. Although <strong>the</strong> lights are installed a bit differently in each<br />
barn, on average <strong>the</strong>y are about 14 feet above <strong>the</strong> barn floor and are spaced about 25 feet apart.<br />
At night, <strong>the</strong> barns are not extremely bright inside, but <strong>the</strong>re is enough light to read a book or<br />
newspaper without much strain.<br />
Results:<br />
We are now into our third year <strong>of</strong> light treatment, and because we have done things a bit<br />
differently every year, it will be most straightforward if each year’s results are presented independently.<br />
We started cautiously in 1999, because we had no idea how <strong>the</strong> system would work.<br />
Ewes selected for <strong>the</strong> light control group were held back from breeding during <strong>the</strong> normal Fall<br />
season, so if <strong>the</strong> light treatment protocol didn’t work, we would have lost production <strong>of</strong> those<br />
ewes for <strong>the</strong> season.<br />
In discussing our results, it is necessary to digress a bit to explain one aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> way we<br />
manage our flock. For <strong>the</strong> past five years, our flock has been divided into two groups, <strong>the</strong> “Elite<br />
Group” and <strong>the</strong> “Production Group”. The Elite Group consists <strong>of</strong> our highest milk-producing<br />
ewes. This group is blood tested three times a year to screen for disease, and it is <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> all<br />
replacement stock for our use or for sale. The two groups are kept separate in every phase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
operation. No replacement stock is kept from <strong>the</strong> Production Group.<br />
Practically, this means during breeding ewes in <strong>the</strong> Production Group can be exposed to a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> rams simultaneously, because it is not important for us to know <strong>the</strong> sire <strong>of</strong> lambs from<br />
that group. Of course <strong>the</strong> opposite is true for <strong>the</strong> Elite Group. Ewes from <strong>the</strong> Elite Group can<br />
only be exposed to one ram at a time, because it is critical to our selection program to know <strong>the</strong><br />
sire <strong>of</strong> replacement stock. This turns out to be important for <strong>the</strong> light control protocol because, as<br />
you will see later, we have had different success rates in <strong>the</strong> two groups.<br />
In 1999 we started only one group <strong>of</strong> 50 ewes in <strong>the</strong> first week <strong>of</strong> January. In <strong>the</strong> first week<br />
<strong>of</strong> March <strong>the</strong> group was turned out to a winter paddock, and five weeks later, <strong>the</strong> rams were<br />
introduced. These ewes were all from our production group, so we were able to put a number <strong>of</strong><br />
rams in <strong>the</strong> group. Within six weeks, 87 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ewes had been marked, and 62 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
those ewes eventually lambed sometime in <strong>the</strong> fall, which we defined as September 1 st through<br />
December 31 st .