Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3. Simulation of parlor throughput, milking efficiency, relative economic returns, and overmilking rate for East Friesian-crossbred dairy ewes in mid- to late-lactation milked in a 1 x 12 Casse system parlor with or without stripping, and by one or two milking technicians. Factor Stripping treatment S S NS NS No. Technicians 1 2 1 2 Parlor entry time 1 , s 45 45 45 45 Milking procedure time 1 , s 344 237 207 186 Parlor exit time 1 , s 30 30 30 30 Parlor time 1 , s 419 312 282 261 Parlor time 1 , min 6.98 5.20 4.70 4.35 Parlor throughput, ewes/hr 103 138 153 166 Milk yield, kg/ewe 0.80 0.80 0.68 0.68 Milking efficiency, kg/hr 82.4 110.4 104.0 112.9 Total receipts 2 , $/hr 108.77 145.73 137.28 149.03 Additional expenses 3 , $/hr - 21.95 18.50 32.31 Relative receipts 4 , $/hr 108.77 123.78 118.78 116.72 Ewes overmilked, no. 11/12 4/12 0/12 0/12 1 For a group of 12 ewes. 2 Receipts from milk sales = $1.32/kg. 3 Additional expenses relative to the S system with one milking technician: Labor costs = $9.00/hr; ewe purchase, management, and feed costs = $0.37 per ewe. 4 Total receipts – additional expenses.
A B milk yield, kg machine milk yield, kg 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.8 * 0.4 60 80 100 120 140 160 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 60 80 100 120 140 160 days in lactation Figure 1. Test-day commercial milk yield (panel A) and morning machine milk yield (the amount of milk obtained without or prior to stripping, panel B), for the two treatment groups: NS ewes ( , n = 24) were not machine stripped from d 80 to the end of lactation; S ewes ( , n = 24) were machine stripped. The dotted line indicates the start of the experiment. * indicates a significant difference among treatments (P < 0.05) * * *
Page 1 and 2:
Proceedings of the 7 th Great Lakes
Page 3 and 4:
ORGANIZING COMMITTEE 7 TH GREAT LAK
Page 5 and 6:
Thursday, November 1 Noon Registrat
Page 7 and 8:
SPEAKERS Dr. Juan-José Arranz, Dpt
Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents (continued) Lates
Page 11 and 12:
eeding and were created to have hig
Page 13 and 14:
Disease in the U.K. and subsequentl
Page 15 and 16:
sheep production conditions in Wisc
Page 17 and 18:
Pinelli, F., P. A. Oltenacu, G. Ian
Page 19 and 20:
Bucket milking and elevated platfor
Page 21 and 22:
Throughputs in different parlors No
Page 23 and 24:
1 - Stand up as straight as possibl
Page 25 and 26:
Roques J.L.. 1997. Traite des brebi
Page 27 and 28:
Grade B milk quality is as follows:
Page 29 and 30:
(c) Not Applicable (d) At least 10
Page 31 and 32:
TOILET AND WATER SUPPLY 7. Toilet (
Page 33 and 34:
(c) Drugs and medicinals shall be l
Page 35 and 36:
FARMSTEAD CHEESE AND MARKETING Stev
Page 37 and 38:
5. Cheese is delivered in person, w
Page 39 and 40:
to participate with us, we are enga
Page 41 and 42:
The key points to this plan were: Y
Page 43 and 44:
Milk is supplied in two major forms
Page 45 and 46:
MANAGEMENT OF A DAIRY SHEEP OPERATI
Page 47 and 48:
4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Chart 1: Mi
Page 49 and 50:
Facilities and Equipment The requir
Page 51 and 52:
from the ewes at 12 to 24 hours of
Page 53 and 54:
COMPARISON OF EAST FRIESIAN AND LAC
Page 55 and 56:
two-year-olds in 2001. East Friesia
Page 57 and 58:
Reproduction. Table 4 compares the
Page 59 and 60:
six ewes were sired by Lacaune ram
Page 61 and 62:
FACTORS AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF EW
Page 63 and 64:
Sheep Genetic factors breed and gen
Page 65 and 66:
Genetic factors The breed and genot
Page 67 and 68:
Physiological factors affecting she
Page 69 and 70:
Management factors affecting the qu
Page 71 and 72:
sheep with one peak of milk ejectio
Page 73 and 74:
An important aspect of dietary fibr
Page 75 and 76:
References Alais C. (1974). Science
Page 77 and 78:
Bufano G., Dario C. and Laudadio V.
Page 79 and 80:
Cowan R.T., Robinson J.J., McHattie
Page 81 and 82:
Folman Y., Volcani R. and Eyal E. (
Page 83 and 84:
Kalantzopoulos G. (1994). Influence
Page 85 and 86: McHattie I., Fraser C., Thompson J.
Page 87 and 88: Peart J.N. (1970). The influence of
Page 89 and 90: Ranieri M.S. (1993). La variazione
Page 91 and 92: Treacher T.T. (1970). Effects of nu
Page 93 and 94: EVALUATION OF SENSORY AND CHEMICAL
Page 95 and 96: ing, the cheeses were brined for 18
Page 97 and 98: The FFA concentrations generally in
Page 99 and 100: Table 1. Composition of pasteurized
Page 101: Table 6. Body and texture scores 1
Page 104 and 105: Present Development of Selection Sc
Page 106 and 107: Breed Usage in Europe Crossbreeding
Page 108 and 109: nearly 1. As a consequence this cha
Page 110 and 111: Table 5. Repeatabilities and phenot
Page 112 and 113: percentage is not expected to resul
Page 114 and 115: Improved AI technique Artificial in
Page 116 and 117: Identifying major genes or QTL rela
Page 118 and 119: Figure 5. Half-sib families and QTL
Page 120 and 121: In the case of cheese the problem i
Page 122 and 123: Emanuelson, U., Danell, B., Philips
Page 124 and 125: Rothschild, M. F., Soller, M. (1997
Page 126 and 127: teat placement in dairy ewes (Fern
Page 128 and 129: that of the average milking time. M
Page 130 and 131: 1988) and active expulsion of fat f
Page 132 and 133: References Barillet, F., and F. Boc
Page 134 and 135: Table 1. Least squares means ± SEM
Page 138 and 139: EFFECT OF REDUCING THE FREQUENCY OF
Page 140 and 141: Individual ewe milk production (mor
Page 142 and 143: dimanche soir sur les brebis de rac
Page 144 and 145: A B A Morning milk yield, kg B Adj.
Page 146 and 147: Background and History: Most sheep
Page 148 and 149: Percent 100 80 60 40 20 0 87 Effect
Page 150 and 151: Fall Lambing Percentage 100 90 80 7
Page 152 and 153: THE EFFECT OF GROWTH RATE ON MAMMAR
Page 154 and 155: After puberty, the mammary gland re
Page 156 and 157: Many trials have examined the mamma
Page 158 and 159: From these results the authors conc
Page 160 and 161: Onset of Puberty and Reproductive P
Page 162 and 163: Similarly, calves, heifers, and cow
Page 164 and 165: McCann, M. A., Goode, L., Harvey, R
Page 166 and 167: DISCUSSION Stability of Frozen Raw
Page 168 and 169: analyzed for titratable acidity, sy
Page 170: 411-416. Wendorff, W.L. 1998. Updat
Page 175 and 176: Recent Outbreaks involving Cheddar
Page 177 and 178: testing on raw milk at the farm. Th
Page 179 and 180: THE AUSTRALIAN SHEEP DAIRY INDUSTRY
Page 181 and 182: The University of Western Australia
Page 183 and 184: Heterosis did not seem to intervene
Page 185 and 186: Lambs The problem of weaning lambs
Page 187 and 188:
GROUP BREEDING SCHEME: A FEASIBLE S
Page 189 and 190:
Where: h = square root of heritabil
Page 191 and 192:
Second step. All members enroll in
Page 193 and 194:
The structure and movement of anima
Page 195 and 196:
CAN THE OVARY INFLUENCE MILK PRODUC
Page 197 and 198:
dividing the amount of milk obtaine
Page 199 and 200:
the CL there were significant diffe
Page 201 and 202:
etween milkings. Finally, this woul
Page 203 and 204:
Table 1. Least squares means ± SEM
Page 205 and 206:
A Daily milk yield (kg) A B Milk fl
Page 207 and 208:
Progesterone (ng/ml) 8 6 4 2 0 CLY:
Page 209 and 210:
milk volume within the cistern (Mar
Page 211 and 212:
Results Treatment milk yield increa
Page 213 and 214:
Reports in dairy cattle concerning
Page 215 and 216:
Muir, D.D., D.S. Horne, A.J.R. Law,
Page 217 and 218:
Milk yield (kg) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6
Page 219 and 220:
A Milk protein (%) A A Milk protein
Page 221 and 222:
TAPPE FARM TOUR Jon & Kris Tappe, T
Page 223:
a little special attention every da
show all

Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?