Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References Barillet, F., and F. Bocquier. 1993. Le contexte de production des ovins laitiers en France : principaux objectifs de recherche-développement et conditions de leur mise en œuvre. INRA Prod. Anim. 6, 17-24. Berger, Y.M., and D.L. Thomas. 1997. Development of the dairy sheep milking parlor at the Spooner Agricultural Research Station. Proc. Third Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symp., Univ. Wisc.-Madison, Dept. Anim. Sci. 24-26. Berger, Y.M. 1998. An economic comparison between a dairy sheep and a non-dairy sheep operation. Proc. Fourth Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symp., Univ. Wisc.-Madison, Dept. Anim. Sci. 32-39. Billon, P. 1998. Milking parlours and milking machines for dairy ewes. Proc. Fourth Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symp., Univ. Wisc.-Madison, Dept. Anim. Sci. 18-31. Bosc, J., J.C. Flamant, and G. Ricordeau. 1967. Traite à la machine des brebis : suppression de l’égouttage manuel ou remplacement par un égouttage-machine. Ann. Zootech. 16, 191-202. Bruckmaier, R.M., G. Paul, H. Mayer, and D. Schams. 1997. Machine milking of Ost-friesian and Lacaune dairy sheep: udder anatomy, milk ejection, and milking characteristics. J. Dairy Res. 64, 163-172. Clough, P. 1964. Machine stripping: is it really necessary? Agriculture: J. Ministry of Ag. Great Britain. 17, 361-363. Davis, S.R., V.C. Farr, J.A. Copeman, V.R. Carruthers, C.H. Knight, and K. Stelwagen. 1998. Partitioning of milk accumulation between cisternal and alveolar compartments of the bovine udder: relationship to production loss during once daily milking. J. Dairy Res. 65, 1-8. Ebendorff, W., K. Kram, G. Michel, and J. Ziesack. 1987. Machine stripping, milk yield and udder health : results of long-term experiments over 4 lactations. Milchwissenschaft. 42, 23- 25. Ebendorff, W., J. Wallstabe, A. Kreutzer, and J. Ziesack. 1990. Effect of automatic udder stimulation and stripping on milk production and udder health of cows. Milchwissenschaft. 45, 299-302. Fernández, G., P. Alvarez, F. San Primitivo, and L.F. de la Fuente. 1995. Factors affecting variation of udder traits of dairy ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 78, 842-849. Fernández, G., J.A. Baro, L.F. de la Fuente, and F. San Primitivo. 1997. Genetic parameters for linear udder traits of dairy ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 601-605. Jatsch, O., and R. Sagi. 1979. Machine milkability as related to dairy yield and its fractions in dairy ewes. Ann. Zootech. 28, 251-260. Knight, C.H., and R.J. Dewhurst. 1994. Once daily milking of dairy cows: relationship between yield loss and cisternal milk storage. J. Dairy Res. 61, 441-449. Labussière, J. 1984. Etude des aptitudes laitières et de la facilité de traite de quelques races de brebis du bassin méditerranéen. Proc. Third Symp. Mach. Milking of Sm. Rum., Valladolid, Spain, 730-792. Labussière, J., B. Benmederbel, B., J.F. Combaud, J.F, and F.A. de la Chevalerie. 1984. The principal milk production traits, udder morphology and milk ejection in Lacaune ewes milked once or twice daily, with or without stripping. Proc. Third Symp. Mach. Milking of Sm. Rum., Valladolid, Spain, 625-652. Labussière, J. 1988. Review of physiological and anatomical factors influencing the milking ability of ewes and the organization of milking. Livest. Prod. Sci. 18, 253-274.
Le Du, J. 1984. Etude de la productivité en salle de traite pour brebis: incidence du trayeur, de la race et de la taille d l’installation. Proc. Third Symp. Mach. Milking Sm. Rum., Valladolid, Spain. 303-325. Le Du, J., and Y. Dano. 1984. Equipement pour l’enregistrement automatique de la cinétique d’émission du lait. Proc. Third Symp. Mach. Milking Sm. Rum., Valladolid, Spain, 425-432. Marnet, P.G. 1998. Physiologie de l’éjection du lait et importance pour la lactation. Renc. Rech. Rum. 5, 313-320. Marnet, P.G., and B.C. McKusick. 2001. Regulation of milk ejection and milkability in small ruminants. Livest. Prod. Sci. 70:125-133. McKusick, B.C., Y.M. Berger, and D.L. Thomas, D.L. 1999. Preliminary results: Effect of udder morphology on commercial milk production of East Friesian crossbred ewes. Proc. Fifth Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symp., Univ. Wisc.-Madison, Dept. Anim. Sci. and Univ. Vermont, Cntr. Sustainable Agric. 81-92. McKusick, B.C., Y.M. Berger, P.G. Marnet, and D.L. Thomas. 2001. Effect of two weaning systems on milk composition, storage, and ejection in dairy ewes. Joint ADSA/ASAS Meeting, Indianapolis, IN (abstract). Mein, G.A., M.R. Brown, and D.M. Williams. 1986. Effects on mastitis of overmilking in conjunction with pulsation failure. J. Dairy Res. 53, 17-22. Molina, M.P., C. Peris, A. Torres, L. Gallego, N. Fernandez, and M. Eitam. 1991. Supreson del repaso manual en el ordeno mecanico de ovejas de raza Manchega. Proc. Fourth Intl. Symp. Mach. Milking Sm. Rum., Kibbutz Shefayin, Israel. 638-654. Peterson, K.J. 1964. Mammary tissue injury resulting from improper machine milking. Am. J. Vet. Res. 25, 1002. Ricordeau, G., J. Martinet, and R. Denamur. 1963. Traite à la machine des brebis Préalpes du sud. Importance des différentes opérations de la traite. Ann. Zootech. 12, 203-225. Ricordeau, G., and J. Labussière. 1968. Traite à la machine des brebis. Conséquences de la suppression de l’égouttage manuel en fonction des caractéristiques de traite. Ann. Zootech. 17, 245-256. Sagi, R., and M. Morag. 1974. Udder conformation, milk yield and milk fractionation in the dairy ewe. Ann. Zootech. 23, 185-192. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 8 Edition. 1999. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. Thomas, D.L., Y. M. Berger, and B.C. McKusick. 2000. East Friesian germplasm: effects on milk production, lamb growth, and lamb survival. Proc. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci., 1999. Online. Available: http://www.asas.org/jas/symposia/proceedings/0908.pdf.
Page 1 and 2:
Proceedings of the 7 th Great Lakes
Page 3 and 4:
ORGANIZING COMMITTEE 7 TH GREAT LAK
Page 5 and 6:
Thursday, November 1 Noon Registrat
Page 7 and 8:
SPEAKERS Dr. Juan-José Arranz, Dpt
Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents (continued) Lates
Page 11 and 12:
eeding and were created to have hig
Page 13 and 14:
Disease in the U.K. and subsequentl
Page 15 and 16:
sheep production conditions in Wisc
Page 17 and 18:
Pinelli, F., P. A. Oltenacu, G. Ian
Page 19 and 20:
Bucket milking and elevated platfor
Page 21 and 22:
Throughputs in different parlors No
Page 23 and 24:
1 - Stand up as straight as possibl
Page 25 and 26:
Roques J.L.. 1997. Traite des brebi
Page 27 and 28:
Grade B milk quality is as follows:
Page 29 and 30:
(c) Not Applicable (d) At least 10
Page 31 and 32:
TOILET AND WATER SUPPLY 7. Toilet (
Page 33 and 34:
(c) Drugs and medicinals shall be l
Page 35 and 36:
FARMSTEAD CHEESE AND MARKETING Stev
Page 37 and 38:
5. Cheese is delivered in person, w
Page 39 and 40:
to participate with us, we are enga
Page 41 and 42:
The key points to this plan were: Y
Page 43 and 44:
Milk is supplied in two major forms
Page 45 and 46:
MANAGEMENT OF A DAIRY SHEEP OPERATI
Page 47 and 48:
4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Chart 1: Mi
Page 49 and 50:
Facilities and Equipment The requir
Page 51 and 52:
from the ewes at 12 to 24 hours of
Page 53 and 54:
COMPARISON OF EAST FRIESIAN AND LAC
Page 55 and 56:
two-year-olds in 2001. East Friesia
Page 57 and 58:
Reproduction. Table 4 compares the
Page 59 and 60:
six ewes were sired by Lacaune ram
Page 61 and 62:
FACTORS AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF EW
Page 63 and 64:
Sheep Genetic factors breed and gen
Page 65 and 66:
Genetic factors The breed and genot
Page 67 and 68:
Physiological factors affecting she
Page 69 and 70:
Management factors affecting the qu
Page 71 and 72:
sheep with one peak of milk ejectio
Page 73 and 74:
An important aspect of dietary fibr
Page 75 and 76:
References Alais C. (1974). Science
Page 77 and 78:
Bufano G., Dario C. and Laudadio V.
Page 79 and 80:
Cowan R.T., Robinson J.J., McHattie
Page 81 and 82: Folman Y., Volcani R. and Eyal E. (
Page 83 and 84: Kalantzopoulos G. (1994). Influence
Page 85 and 86: McHattie I., Fraser C., Thompson J.
Page 87 and 88: Peart J.N. (1970). The influence of
Page 89 and 90: Ranieri M.S. (1993). La variazione
Page 91 and 92: Treacher T.T. (1970). Effects of nu
Page 93 and 94: EVALUATION OF SENSORY AND CHEMICAL
Page 95 and 96: ing, the cheeses were brined for 18
Page 97 and 98: The FFA concentrations generally in
Page 99 and 100: Table 1. Composition of pasteurized
Page 101: Table 6. Body and texture scores 1
Page 104 and 105: Present Development of Selection Sc
Page 106 and 107: Breed Usage in Europe Crossbreeding
Page 108 and 109: nearly 1. As a consequence this cha
Page 110 and 111: Table 5. Repeatabilities and phenot
Page 112 and 113: percentage is not expected to resul
Page 114 and 115: Improved AI technique Artificial in
Page 116 and 117: Identifying major genes or QTL rela
Page 118 and 119: Figure 5. Half-sib families and QTL
Page 120 and 121: In the case of cheese the problem i
Page 122 and 123: Emanuelson, U., Danell, B., Philips
Page 124 and 125: Rothschild, M. F., Soller, M. (1997
Page 126 and 127: teat placement in dairy ewes (Fern
Page 128 and 129: that of the average milking time. M
Page 130 and 131: 1988) and active expulsion of fat f
Page 134 and 135: Table 1. Least squares means ± SEM
Page 136 and 137: Table 3. Simulation of parlor throu
Page 138 and 139: EFFECT OF REDUCING THE FREQUENCY OF
Page 140 and 141: Individual ewe milk production (mor
Page 142 and 143: dimanche soir sur les brebis de rac
Page 144 and 145: A B A Morning milk yield, kg B Adj.
Page 146 and 147: Background and History: Most sheep
Page 148 and 149: Percent 100 80 60 40 20 0 87 Effect
Page 150 and 151: Fall Lambing Percentage 100 90 80 7
Page 152 and 153: THE EFFECT OF GROWTH RATE ON MAMMAR
Page 154 and 155: After puberty, the mammary gland re
Page 156 and 157: Many trials have examined the mamma
Page 158 and 159: From these results the authors conc
Page 160 and 161: Onset of Puberty and Reproductive P
Page 162 and 163: Similarly, calves, heifers, and cow
Page 164 and 165: McCann, M. A., Goode, L., Harvey, R
Page 166 and 167: DISCUSSION Stability of Frozen Raw
Page 168 and 169: analyzed for titratable acidity, sy
Page 170: 411-416. Wendorff, W.L. 1998. Updat
Page 175 and 176: Recent Outbreaks involving Cheddar
Page 177 and 178: testing on raw milk at the farm. Th
Page 179 and 180: THE AUSTRALIAN SHEEP DAIRY INDUSTRY
Page 181 and 182: The University of Western Australia
Page 183 and 184:
Heterosis did not seem to intervene
Page 185 and 186:
Lambs The problem of weaning lambs
Page 187 and 188:
GROUP BREEDING SCHEME: A FEASIBLE S
Page 189 and 190:
Where: h = square root of heritabil
Page 191 and 192:
Second step. All members enroll in
Page 193 and 194:
The structure and movement of anima
Page 195 and 196:
CAN THE OVARY INFLUENCE MILK PRODUC
Page 197 and 198:
dividing the amount of milk obtaine
Page 199 and 200:
the CL there were significant diffe
Page 201 and 202:
etween milkings. Finally, this woul
Page 203 and 204:
Table 1. Least squares means ± SEM
Page 205 and 206:
A Daily milk yield (kg) A B Milk fl
Page 207 and 208:
Progesterone (ng/ml) 8 6 4 2 0 CLY:
Page 209 and 210:
milk volume within the cistern (Mar
Page 211 and 212:
Results Treatment milk yield increa
Page 213 and 214:
Reports in dairy cattle concerning
Page 215 and 216:
Muir, D.D., D.S. Horne, A.J.R. Law,
Page 217 and 218:
Milk yield (kg) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6
Page 219 and 220:
A Milk protein (%) A A Milk protein
Page 221 and 222:
TAPPE FARM TOUR Jon & Kris Tappe, T
Page 223:
a little special attention every da
show all

Dairy Sheep Symposium - the Department of Animal Sciences ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?