In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> cheese <strong>the</strong> problem is different and individual traceability is not possible. However <strong>the</strong>re are many projects devoted to <strong>the</strong> assignment <strong>of</strong> a product to a specific breed. This aspect could be very useful for products with appellation <strong>of</strong> origin and for this purpose a combination <strong>of</strong> microsatellite markers can be used (Arranz et al., 2001). Moreover breed-specific markers such as mitochondrial haplotypes or a combination <strong>of</strong> breed-specific SNPs are being evaluated for this goal. For this purpose more powerful statistical tools should be developed mainly in Bayesian or Artificial Intelligence frameworks. Final remark As a general conclusion from <strong>the</strong> present paper we may indicate that most dairy sheep breeding programs which are currently being undertaken are based on milk yield criteria, and no or little advantage is taken from o<strong>the</strong>r tools which could improve breeding programs efficiency. Certain strategies described here are already available for <strong>the</strong>ir practical utilization. This is <strong>the</strong> case, for example, <strong>of</strong> recent innovations in reproductive techniques. For <strong>the</strong>ir part, among <strong>the</strong> selection parameters we can point out milk composition traits, udder morphology and somatic cell count (SCC), which are already considered among <strong>the</strong> selection criteria in a few sheep breeds, situation that most probably will be made extensive to <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> breeds. Genetic resistance to pathological processes is probably one <strong>the</strong> most promising areas <strong>of</strong> investigation. Until now it has led to important findings only in a few cases, among which we can cite “scrapie”, allowing for a selection <strong>of</strong> favorable genotypes. O<strong>the</strong>r aspects approached in this paper, such as molecular tools, need to be deeply explored before <strong>the</strong>y can be used in practice, but presumably fur<strong>the</strong>r investigations will make <strong>the</strong>ir application possible in a near future. Finally we should remark that besides <strong>the</strong> economic benefit, all <strong>the</strong>se advancements will facilitate management procedures and this will undoubtedly result in an amelioration <strong>of</strong> sheep farmers livelihood. Literature cited Arranz, J.J., Bayón, Y., San Primitivo, F. (2001). Differentiation among Spanish sheep breeds using microsatellites. Genet. Sel. Evol. (in press). Astruc, J.M., Barillet, F. (2000). Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> working group on milk recording <strong>of</strong> sheep. 32nd Biennial Session <strong>of</strong> ICAR and INTERBULL. Bled, Slovenia, between 14-19 May 2000. Banos, G., Shook, G.E. (1990). Genotype by environment interaction and genetic correlations among parities for somatic cell count and milk yield. J. <strong>Dairy</strong> Sci., 73: 2563-2573. Barillet, F. (1997). “Genetics <strong>of</strong> milk production”. Piper, L.; Ruvinsky, A. The genetics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sheep. 539-567. Oxford, CAB International. Barillet, F., Marie, C., Jacquin, M., Lagriffoul, G., Astruc, J.M. (2001). The French Lacaune dairy sheep breed: use in France and abroad in <strong>the</strong> last 40 years. Lives. Prod. Sci., 71: 17-29. Beattie, C.W. (1994). Livestock genome maps. Trends Genet., 10: 334-338. Brenneman, R.A., Davis, S.K., Sanders, J.O., Burns, B.M., Wheeler, T.C., Turner, J.W., Taylor, J.F. (1996). The polled locus maps to BTA1 in a Bos indicus x Bos taurus cross. J. Hered. 87, 156–161. Bryne, P.F., McMullen, M.D. (1996). Defining genes for agricultural traits: QTL analysis and <strong>the</strong> candidate gene approach. Probe 7: 24-27. CERSYRA, 2001. Memoria de actividades del ESROM 2000. 35 pp. Valdepeñas. Spain
Charlier, C., Segers, K., Wagenaar, D., Karim, L., Berghmans, S., Jaillon, O., Shay, T., Weissenbach, J., Cockett. N., Gyapay, G., Georges, M. (2001). Human-ovine comparative sequencing <strong>of</strong> a 250-kb imprinted domain encompassing <strong>the</strong> callipyge (clpg) locus and identification <strong>of</strong> six imprinted transcripts: DLK1, DAT, GTL2, PEG11, antiPEG11, and MEG8. Genome Res., 11: 850-862. Cockett, N.E., Jackson, S.P., Shay, T.L., Farnir, F., Berghmans, S., Snowder, G.D., Nielsen, D.M., Georges, M. (1996). Polar overdominance at <strong>the</strong> ovine callipyge locus. Science, 273: 236-238. Cockett, N.E., Shay, T.L., Beever, J.E., Nielsen, D., Albretsen, J., Georges, M., Peterson, K., Stephens, A., Vernon, W., Tim<strong>of</strong>eevskaia, O., South, S., Mork, J., Maciulis, A., Bunch, T.D. (1999). Localization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> locus causing Spider Lamb Syndrome to <strong>the</strong> distal end <strong>of</strong> ovine Chromosome 6. Mamm Genome, 10: 35-38. Coltman, D.W., Wilson, K., Pilkington, J.G., Stear, M.J., Pemberton, J.M. (2001). A microsatellite polymorphism in <strong>the</strong> gamma interferon gene is associated with resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes in a naturally-parasitized population <strong>of</strong> Soay sheep. Parasitology,122: 571-582. Crawford, A.M., Dodds, K.G., Ede, A.J., Pierson, C.A., Montgomery, G.W., Garmonsway, H.G., Beattie, A.E., Davies, K., Maddox, J.F., Kappes, S.W. (1995). An autosomal genetic linkage map <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sheep genome. Genetics, 140: 703-724. Crawford, A.M., Phua, S.H., McEwan, J.C., Dodds, K.G., Wright, C.C., Morris, C.A., Bisset, S.A., Green, R.S. (1997). Finding disease resistance QTL in sheep. <strong>Animal</strong> Biotechnology, 8: 13-22. Da, Y., Grossman, M., Misztal, I., Wigans, R.R. (1992). Estimation <strong>of</strong> genetic parameters for somatic cell score in Holsteins. J. <strong>Dairy</strong> Sci., 75: 2265-2271. Davis, G.H., Dodds, K.G., Wheeler, R., Jay, N.P. (2001). Evidence that an imprinted gene on <strong>the</strong> X chromosome increases ovulation rate in sheep. Biol. Reprod., 64: 216-221. de Gortari, M.J., Freking, B.A., Cuthbertson, R.P., Kappes, S.M., Keele, J.W., Stone, R.T., Leymaster, K.A., Dodds, K.G., Crawford, A.M., Beattie, C.W. (1998). A second-generation linkage map <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sheep genome. Mamm. Genome, 9: 204-209. de la Fuente, L.F., Fernández, G. , San Primitivo, F. (1995). A linear evaluation system for udder traits <strong>of</strong> dairy ewes. Livest. Prod. Sci., 45: 171-178. de la Fuente, L.F., San Primitivo, F. (1997). Amélioration génétique de la morphologie de la mamelle des brebis laitières. Cah. Options Mediterr., 33: 143-152. de la Fuente, L.F., Pérez-Guzman, M.D., Othmane, M.H., Arranz, J. (1998). Amélioration génétique de la morphologie de la mamelle dans les races Churra, Laxta et Manchega. Proc. <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6th Int. Symp. on <strong>the</strong> Milking <strong>of</strong> Small Ruminants. EAAP Publicación Nº 95: 369-374. de la Fuente, L.F. (2001). La raza Churra. Evolución del núcleo de selección de la raza Churra la valoración de sementales en el programa de selección de la aza Churra. Web page <strong>of</strong> ANCHE (Breeders Association <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Churra Breed). (http://www.ctv.es/USERS/anche/ evolucion.htm) Diez-Tascón, C. Bayón, Y. Arranz, J.J., de la Fuente, L.F., San Primitivo, F. (2001). Mapping quantitative trait loci for milk production traits on ovine chromosome six. J. <strong>Dairy</strong> Res. (in press). El-Saied, U.M., Carriedo, J.A., San Primitivo, F. (1998). Heritability <strong>of</strong> test day somatic cell counts and its relationship with milk yield and protein percentage in dairy ewes. J. <strong>Dairy</strong> Sci., 81: 2956-2961. El-Saied, U.M., Carriedo, J.A., de la Fuente, L.F., San Primitivo, F. (1999). Genetic parameters <strong>of</strong> lactation cell counts and milk and protein yields in dairy ewes. J. <strong>Dairy</strong> Sci., 82: 639-644
- Page 1 and 2:
Proceedings of the 7 th Great Lakes
- Page 3 and 4:
ORGANIZING COMMITTEE 7 TH GREAT LAK
- Page 5 and 6:
Thursday, November 1 Noon Registrat
- Page 7 and 8:
SPEAKERS Dr. Juan-José Arranz, Dpt
- Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents (continued) Lates
- Page 11 and 12:
eeding and were created to have hig
- Page 13 and 14:
Disease in the U.K. and subsequentl
- Page 15 and 16:
sheep production conditions in Wisc
- Page 17 and 18:
Pinelli, F., P. A. Oltenacu, G. Ian
- Page 19 and 20:
Bucket milking and elevated platfor
- Page 21 and 22:
Throughputs in different parlors No
- Page 23 and 24:
1 - Stand up as straight as possibl
- Page 25 and 26:
Roques J.L.. 1997. Traite des brebi
- Page 27 and 28:
Grade B milk quality is as follows:
- Page 29 and 30:
(c) Not Applicable (d) At least 10
- Page 31 and 32:
TOILET AND WATER SUPPLY 7. Toilet (
- Page 33 and 34:
(c) Drugs and medicinals shall be l
- Page 35 and 36:
FARMSTEAD CHEESE AND MARKETING Stev
- Page 37 and 38:
5. Cheese is delivered in person, w
- Page 39 and 40:
to participate with us, we are enga
- Page 41 and 42:
The key points to this plan were: Y
- Page 43 and 44:
Milk is supplied in two major forms
- Page 45 and 46:
MANAGEMENT OF A DAIRY SHEEP OPERATI
- Page 47 and 48:
4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Chart 1: Mi
- Page 49 and 50:
Facilities and Equipment The requir
- Page 51 and 52:
from the ewes at 12 to 24 hours of
- Page 53 and 54:
COMPARISON OF EAST FRIESIAN AND LAC
- Page 55 and 56:
two-year-olds in 2001. East Friesia
- Page 57 and 58:
Reproduction. Table 4 compares the
- Page 59 and 60:
six ewes were sired by Lacaune ram
- Page 61 and 62:
FACTORS AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF EW
- Page 63 and 64:
Sheep Genetic factors breed and gen
- Page 65 and 66:
Genetic factors The breed and genot
- Page 67 and 68:
Physiological factors affecting she
- Page 69 and 70: Management factors affecting the qu
- Page 71 and 72: sheep with one peak of milk ejectio
- Page 73 and 74: An important aspect of dietary fibr
- Page 75 and 76: References Alais C. (1974). Science
- Page 77 and 78: Bufano G., Dario C. and Laudadio V.
- Page 79 and 80: Cowan R.T., Robinson J.J., McHattie
- Page 81 and 82: Folman Y., Volcani R. and Eyal E. (
- Page 83 and 84: Kalantzopoulos G. (1994). Influence
- Page 85 and 86: McHattie I., Fraser C., Thompson J.
- Page 87 and 88: Peart J.N. (1970). The influence of
- Page 89 and 90: Ranieri M.S. (1993). La variazione
- Page 91 and 92: Treacher T.T. (1970). Effects of nu
- Page 93 and 94: EVALUATION OF SENSORY AND CHEMICAL
- Page 95 and 96: ing, the cheeses were brined for 18
- Page 97 and 98: The FFA concentrations generally in
- Page 99 and 100: Table 1. Composition of pasteurized
- Page 101: Table 6. Body and texture scores 1
- Page 104 and 105: Present Development of Selection Sc
- Page 106 and 107: Breed Usage in Europe Crossbreeding
- Page 108 and 109: nearly 1. As a consequence this cha
- Page 110 and 111: Table 5. Repeatabilities and phenot
- Page 112 and 113: percentage is not expected to resul
- Page 114 and 115: Improved AI technique Artificial in
- Page 116 and 117: Identifying major genes or QTL rela
- Page 118 and 119: Figure 5. Half-sib families and QTL
- Page 122 and 123: Emanuelson, U., Danell, B., Philips
- Page 124 and 125: Rothschild, M. F., Soller, M. (1997
- Page 126 and 127: teat placement in dairy ewes (Fern
- Page 128 and 129: that of the average milking time. M
- Page 130 and 131: 1988) and active expulsion of fat f
- Page 132 and 133: References Barillet, F., and F. Boc
- Page 134 and 135: Table 1. Least squares means ± SEM
- Page 136 and 137: Table 3. Simulation of parlor throu
- Page 138 and 139: EFFECT OF REDUCING THE FREQUENCY OF
- Page 140 and 141: Individual ewe milk production (mor
- Page 142 and 143: dimanche soir sur les brebis de rac
- Page 144 and 145: A B A Morning milk yield, kg B Adj.
- Page 146 and 147: Background and History: Most sheep
- Page 148 and 149: Percent 100 80 60 40 20 0 87 Effect
- Page 150 and 151: Fall Lambing Percentage 100 90 80 7
- Page 152 and 153: THE EFFECT OF GROWTH RATE ON MAMMAR
- Page 154 and 155: After puberty, the mammary gland re
- Page 156 and 157: Many trials have examined the mamma
- Page 158 and 159: From these results the authors conc
- Page 160 and 161: Onset of Puberty and Reproductive P
- Page 162 and 163: Similarly, calves, heifers, and cow
- Page 164 and 165: McCann, M. A., Goode, L., Harvey, R
- Page 166 and 167: DISCUSSION Stability of Frozen Raw
- Page 168 and 169: analyzed for titratable acidity, sy
- Page 170:
411-416. Wendorff, W.L. 1998. Updat
- Page 175 and 176:
Recent Outbreaks involving Cheddar
- Page 177 and 178:
testing on raw milk at the farm. Th
- Page 179 and 180:
THE AUSTRALIAN SHEEP DAIRY INDUSTRY
- Page 181 and 182:
The University of Western Australia
- Page 183 and 184:
Heterosis did not seem to intervene
- Page 185 and 186:
Lambs The problem of weaning lambs
- Page 187 and 188:
GROUP BREEDING SCHEME: A FEASIBLE S
- Page 189 and 190:
Where: h = square root of heritabil
- Page 191 and 192:
Second step. All members enroll in
- Page 193 and 194:
The structure and movement of anima
- Page 195 and 196:
CAN THE OVARY INFLUENCE MILK PRODUC
- Page 197 and 198:
dividing the amount of milk obtaine
- Page 199 and 200:
the CL there were significant diffe
- Page 201 and 202:
etween milkings. Finally, this woul
- Page 203 and 204:
Table 1. Least squares means ± SEM
- Page 205 and 206:
A Daily milk yield (kg) A B Milk fl
- Page 207 and 208:
Progesterone (ng/ml) 8 6 4 2 0 CLY:
- Page 209 and 210:
milk volume within the cistern (Mar
- Page 211 and 212:
Results Treatment milk yield increa
- Page 213 and 214:
Reports in dairy cattle concerning
- Page 215 and 216:
Muir, D.D., D.S. Horne, A.J.R. Law,
- Page 217 and 218:
Milk yield (kg) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6
- Page 219 and 220:
A Milk protein (%) A A Milk protein
- Page 221 and 222:
TAPPE FARM TOUR Jon & Kris Tappe, T
- Page 223:
a little special attention every da