(PHCII) - MMH/MMS
(PHCII) - MMH/MMS
(PHCII) - MMH/MMS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.0 DISCUSSION.<br />
CHAPTER FIVE<br />
The discussions in this chapter are based on research findings and literature review with<br />
its relationship to objectives of this study.<br />
An overall 208 (52%) of respondents had there confinement at home while health unit<br />
delivery was 192 (48%) of the respondents. This implies that more than a half of<br />
pregnant mothers deliver at home settings where they can be subjected to high health<br />
risks. Similar findings were observed by Tanzania Demographic Health Survey<br />
(1996), which described health facility delivery being 47% and home delivery being<br />
50%. Further more WHO estimates in developing countries deliveries in health units is<br />
only 40% while 54% of all deliveries are out side health units (WHO 1997)<br />
It was found that women with deliveries of (1 – 4) majority of them had their<br />
confinement in health units 139 (34.75%), while women with 5 deliveries and above<br />
who constituted 89 (22.25%) had their confinement at home. This indicated that grand<br />
maltiparous women who are already at risk do subject themselves to further dangers<br />
during delivery by delivering outside health units.<br />
Study findings on distance show that there is an influence on place of delivery as<br />
women living far from the health units did deliver at home. The Focus group discussion<br />
with 8 villages showed negative perception on quality of obstetric care that is there were<br />
inadequate skilled health workers, shortage of equipments, supplies and negative<br />
attitude of health workers to clients. This could be due to poor distribution of skilled<br />
health workers, shortage of equipments, supplies and non employment.<br />
26